Dr. Graeme P. Penney Profile

Dr. Graeme P. Penney

at Kings College London

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (13)

Proceedings Article | 20 March 2015 Paper

Remapping of digital subtraction angiography on a standard fluoroscopy system using 2D-3D registration

Mazen Alhrishy, Andreas Varnavas, Alexis Guyot, Tom Carrell, Andrew King, Graeme Penney

Proceedings Volume 9413, 94131O (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082023

KEYWORDS: Image registration, Angiography, Visualization, Image segmentation, Image enhancement, Computed tomography, X-rays, Kidney, Blood vessels, Solids

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 14 March 2009 Paper

Spatial compounding of large sets of 3D echocardiography images

Cheng Yao, John Simpson, Christian H. P. Jansen, Andrew King, Graeme Penney

Proceedings Volume 7265, 726515 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810906

KEYWORDS: Signal to noise ratio, Image registration, 3D image processing, Image quality, Ultrasonography, Echocardiography, Tissues, Image processing, Optical inspection, Blood

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 13 March 2009 Paper

Echocardiography to magnetic resonance image registration for use in image-guide electrophysiology procedures

YingLiang Ma, Kawal Rhode, Andrew King, Dennis Cauldfield, Michael Cooklin, Reza Razavi, Graeme Penney

Proceedings Volume 7261, 72610Q (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810999

KEYWORDS: Magnetic resonance imaging, Image registration, 3D image processing, X-rays, Ultrasonography, Image segmentation, X-ray imaging, Echocardiography, Electrophysiology, 3D modeling

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 13 March 2009 Paper

A system for the registration of arthroscopic images to magnetic resonance images of the knee: for improved virtual knee arthroscopy

Chengliang Hu, Giancarlo Amati, Nicola Gullick, Stephen Oakley, Vassilios Hurmusiadis, Tobias Schaeffter, Graeme Penney, Kawal Rhode

Proceedings Volume 7261, 726119 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.813775

KEYWORDS: Video, Image registration, Magnetic resonance imaging, X-rays, Cameras, Calibration, Data modeling, Imaging systems, Optical tracking, 3D image processing

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 25 March 2008 Paper

Ultrasound calibration using intensity-based image registration: for application in cardiac catheterization procedures

Y. Ma, K. Rhode, G. Gao, A. King, P. Chinchapatnam, T. Schaeffter, D. Hawkes, R. Razavi, G. Penney

Proceedings Volume 6918, 69180O (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770174

KEYWORDS: Calibration, Image registration, Ultrasonography, Liver, Transducers, 3D image processing, Optical tracking, Transform theory, Image filtering, Heart

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 17 March 2008 Paper

Augmented reality image guidance for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass

Michael Figl, Daniel Rueckert, David Hawkes, Roberto Casula, Mingxing Hu, Ose Pedro, Dong Ping Zhang, Graeme Penney, Fernando Bello, Philip Edwards

Proceedings Volume 6918, 69180P (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.774788

KEYWORDS: Heart, Arteries, Image registration, Surgery, Imaging systems, Endoscopy, Video, Endoscopes, Cameras, Motion models

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 11 March 2008 Paper

Use of a CT statistical deformation model for multi-modal pelvic bone segmentation

Stephen Thompson, Graeme Penney, Damien Buie, Prokar Dasgupta, Dave Hawkes

Proceedings Volume 6914, 69141O (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770254

KEYWORDS: Magnetic resonance imaging, Data modeling, Bone, Image segmentation, Image registration, Statistical modeling, Computed tomography, Image processing algorithms and systems, Rigid registration, Surgery

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 11 March 2008 Paper

A novel framework for multi-modal intensity-based similarity measures based on internal similarity

Graeme Penney, Lewis Griffin, Andrew King, David Hawkes

Proceedings Volume 6914, 69140X (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.769402

KEYWORDS: Image registration, Image enhancement, 3D image enhancement, Image processing, Ultrasonography, Magnetic resonance imaging, 3D image processing, Computed tomography, Bone, Gold

Read Abstract +

We present a novel framework for describing intensity-based multi-modal similarity measures. Our framework is based around a concept of internal, or self, similarity. Firstly the locations of multiple regions or patches which are "similar" to each other are identified within a single image. The term "similar" is used here to represent a generic intra-modal similarity measure. Then if we examine a second image in the same locations, and this image is registered to the first image, we should find that the patches in these locations are also "similar", though the actual features in the patches when compared between the images could be very different. We propose that a measure based on this principle could be used as an inter-modal similarity measure because, as the two images become increasingly misregistered then the patches within the second image should become increasingly dissimilar. Therefore, our framework results in an inter-modal similarity measure by using two intra-modal similarity measures applied separately within each image. In this paper we describe how popular multi-modal similarity measures such as mutual information can be described within this framework. In addition the framework has the potential to allow the formation of novel similarity measures which can register using regional information, rather than individual pixel/voxel intensities. An example similarity measure is produced and its ability to guide a registration algorithm is investigated. Registration experiments are carried out using three datasets. The pairs of images to be registered were specifically chosen as they were expected to challenge (i.e. result in misregistrations) standard intensity-based measures, such as mutual information. The images include synthetic data, cadaver data and clinical data and cover a range of modalities. Our experiments show that our proposed measure is able to achieve accurate registrations where standard intensity-based measures, such as mutual information, fail.

Proceedings Article | 11 March 2008 Paper

Fusion of rat brain histology and MRI using weighted multi-image mutual information

Christoph Palm, Graeme Penney, William Crum, Julia Schnabel, Uwe Pietrzyk, David Hawkes

Proceedings Volume 6914, 69140M (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770605

KEYWORDS: Magnetic resonance imaging, Image registration, Brain, Image fusion, 3D image processing, In vitro testing, In vivo imaging, Spatial resolution, Medical imaging, Image resolution

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 5 May 2004 Paper

Tracking alignment of sparse ultrasound with preoperative images of the liver and an interventional plan using models of respiratory motion and deformation

Jane Blackall, Graeme Penney, Andrew King, Andreas Adam, David Hawkes

Proceedings Volume 5367, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535180

KEYWORDS: Image registration, Liver, Ultrasonography, Motion models, Magnetic resonance imaging, Data modeling, 3D image processing, Modeling, 3D modeling, Visualization

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 3 July 2001 Paper

Template selection and rejection for robust nonrigid 3D registration in the presence of large deformations

Peter Roesch, Torsten Mohs, Thomas Netsch, Marcel Quist, Graeme Penney, David Hawkes, Juergen Weese

Proceedings Volume 4322, (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431128

KEYWORDS: Image registration, Image classification, 3D image processing, Magnetic resonance imaging, Image quality, Lung, Image analysis, Neck, Image visualization, Visualization

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 6 June 2000 Paper

Deforming a preoperative volume to better represent the intraoperative scene

Graeme Penney, John Little, Juergen Weese, Derek Hill, David Hawkes

Proceedings Volume 3979, (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.387709

KEYWORDS: Fluoroscopy, Image registration, Computed tomography, Matrices, Spine, Image segmentation, Tissues, Visualization, Lithium, X-ray computed tomography

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 21 May 1999 Paper

Fast voxel-based 2D/3D registration algorithm using a volume rendering method based on the shear-warp factorization

Juergen Weese, Roland Goecke, Graeme Penney, Paul Desmedt, Thorsten Buzug, Heidrun Schumann

Proceedings Volume 3661, (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.348638

KEYWORDS: Image registration, X-ray computed tomography, X-rays, X-ray imaging, Volume rendering, Image resolution, X-ray sources, Spine, Image restoration, Fluoroscopy

Read Abstract +

Showing 5 of 13 publications

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years