Mr. Gustavo H. Beckman Gomes Profile

Gustavo H. Beckman Gomes

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 3 April 2018 Paper

Automated volumetric damage detection and quantification using region-based convolution neural networks and an inexpensive depth camera

Gustavo Beckman, Dimos Polyzois, Young-Jin Cha

Proceedings Volume 10598, 105980W (2018) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295959

KEYWORDS: Sensors, Damage detection, Cameras, Data acquisition, RGB color model, Clouds, Convolution, Neural networks, Infrared sensors, 3D image processing

Read Abstract +

Structural health monitoring has become an outstanding tool to perform structural condition assessments, once performed solely by trained experts. In this study, a methodology utilizing an inexpensive depth sensor to detect and quantify volumetric damages within concrete surfaces is proposed. To allow automatic damage detection, a Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN)-based method is implemented. A database of 444 images with resolution of 853×1440 pixels annotated for concrete spalling is developed. The network is modified, trained and validated using the proposed database. Damage quantification is automatically performed using the depth data output by the sensor. The surface of the analyzed element is extracted by merging the bounding boxes output by the Faster R-CNN onto the depth map. A polystyrene test rig containing damage simulations of known volume was utilized to test the accuracy of volume calculation. In addition to that, a concrete beam was also used to test the entire system. The Faster R-CNN yielded an average precision (AP) of 77.97% for damage detection. Damage quantification routine presents error of 9.45% in volume quantification of samples located within 100 cm and 250 cm away from the sensor plane. On top of that, maximum depth measurements of damages show a mean precision error (MPE) of 3.24% considering the same distance range. The implemented method allows for damage segmentation and quantification regardless of the distance between the sensor and the analyzed element.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years