Ms. Jessica Anderson Profile

Jessica Anderson

at Boston Univ

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

SPIE Journal Paper | 22 October 2022 Open Access

How much do time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) moments improve estimation of brain activity over traditional fNIRS?

Antonio Ortega-Martinez, De'Ja Rogers, Jessica Anderson, Parya Farzam, Yuanyuan Gao, Bernhard Zimmermann, Meryem Yücel, David Boas

NPh, Vol. 10, Issue 01, 013504, (October 2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.10.1117/1.NPh.10.1.013504

KEYWORDS: Brain, Near infrared spectroscopy, Sensors, Absorption, Continuous wave operation, Monte Carlo methods, Neurophotonics, Hemodynamics, Statistical analysis, Photons

Read Abstract +

SignificanceAdvances in electronics have allowed the recent development of compact, high channel count time domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy (TD-fNIRS) systems. Temporal moment analysis has been proposed for increased brain sensitivity due to the depth selectivity of higher order temporal moments. We propose a general linear model (GLM) incorporating TD moment data and auxiliary physiological measurements, such as short separation channels, to improve the recovery of the HRF.AimsWe compare the performance of previously reported multi-distance TD moment techniques to commonly used techniques for continuous wave (CW) fNIRS hemodynamic response function (HRF) recovery, namely block averaging and CW GLM. Additionally, we compare the multi-distance TD moment technique to TD moment GLM.ApproachWe augmented resting TD-fNIRS moment data (six subjects) with known synthetic HRFs. We then employed block averaging and GLM techniques with “short-separation regression” designed both for CW and TD to recover the HRFs. We calculated the root mean square error (RMSE) and the correlation of the recovered HRF to the ground truth. We compared the performance of equivalent CW and TD techniques with paired t-tests.ResultsWe found that, on average, TD moment HRF recovery improves correlations by 98% and 48% for HbO and HbR respectively, over CW GLM. The improvement on the correlation for TD GLM over TD moment is 12% (HbO) and 27% (HbR). RMSE decreases 56% and 52% (HbO and HbR) for TD moment compared to CW GLM. We found no statistically significant improvement in the RMSE for TD GLM compared to TD moment.ConclusionsProperly covariance-scaled TD moment techniques outperform their CW equivalents in both RMSE and correlation in the recovery of the synthetic HRFs. Furthermore, our proposed TD GLM based on moments outperforms regular TD moment analysis, while allowing the incorporation of auxiliary measurements of the confounding physiological signals from the scalp.

DOWNLOAD PAPER

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years