Dr. Keni Zheng Profile

Dr. Keni Zheng

at Delaware State Univ

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 15 February 2021 Presentation + Paper

Sparse analysis of deep features for characterization of breast masses

Sokratis Makrogiannis, Keni Zheng, Chelsea Harris

Proceedings Volume 11597, 115970E (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2582321

KEYWORDS: Breast, Breast cancer, Skin cancer, Associative arrays, Receivers, Mammography, Diagnostics, Convolutional neural networks, Cancer

Read Abstract +

Breast cancer is the second most common type of cancer of women in the U.S. behind skin cancer. Early detection and characterization of breast masses is critical for effective diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Computer-aided breast mass characterization methods would help to improve the accuracy of diagnoses, their reproducibility, and the throughput of breast cancer screening workflows. In this work, we introduce sparse representations of deep learning features for separation of malignant from benign breast masses in mammograms. We expect that the use of deep feature-based dictionaries will produce better benign/malignant class separation than straightforward sparse representation techniques, and fine-tuned convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We performed 10- and 30-fold cross-validation experiments for classification of benign and malignant breast masses on the MIAS and DDSM mammographic datasets. The results show that the proposed deep feature sparse analysis produces better classification rates than conventional sparse representations and fine-tuned CNNs. The top areas under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating curve are 80.64% for 10-fold and 97.44% for 30-fold cross-validation in MIAS, and 77.29% for 10-fold and 76.02% for 30-fold cross-validation in DDSM. The main advantages of this approach are that it employs dictionaries of deep network features that are sparse in nature and that it alleviates the need for large volumes of training data and lengthy training procedures. The interesting results from this work prompt further exploration of the relationship between sparse optimization problems and deep learning.

Proceedings Article | 13 March 2019 Paper

Ensembles of sparse classifiers for osteoporosis characterization in digital radiographs

Keni Zheng, Rachid Jennane, Sokratis Makrogiannis

Proceedings Volume 10950, 1095024 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2511179

KEYWORDS: Image classification, Bone, Radiography, Classification systems, Algorithm development

Read Abstract +

The analysis and characterization of imaging patterns is a significant research area with several applications to biomedicine, remote sensing, homeland security, social networking, and numerous other domains. In this paper we study and develop mathematical methods and algorithms for disease diagnosis and tissue characterization. The central hypothesis is that we can predict the occurrence of diseases with a certain level of confidence using supervised learning techniques that we apply to medical imaging datasets that include healthy and diseased subjects. We develop methods for calculation of sparse representations to classify imaging patterns and we explore the advantages of this technique over traditional texture-based classification. We introduce integrative sparse classifier systems that utilize structural block decomposition to address difficulties caused by high dimensionality. We propose likelihood functions for classification and decision tuning strategies. We performed osteoporosis classification experiments on the TCB challenge dataset. TCB contains digital radiographs of the calcaneus trabecular bone of 87 healthy and 87 osteoporotic subjects. The scans of healthy and diseased subjects show little or no visual differences, and their density histograms have significant overlap. We applied 30-fold crossvalidation to evaluate the classification performances of our methods, and compared them to a texture based classification system. Our results show that ensemble sparse representations of imaging patterns provide very good separation between groups of healthy and diseased subjects and perform better than conventional sparse and texture-based techniques.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years