Mr. Max G. Taylor Profile

Max G. Taylor

Principal Software Systems Engineer at Collins Aerospace

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 1 May 2019 Presentation + Paper

High-integrity navigation for sensor-based 3D world modeling

Vladislav Gavrilets, Chris Boggs, Max Taylor

Proceedings Volume 11019, 110190M (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518465

KEYWORDS: Sensors, 3D modeling, Error analysis, Global Positioning System, Navigation systems, Driver's vision enhancers, Free space, Environmental sensing, Visual process modeling, Clouds

Read Abstract +

There is emerging demand for multi-ship sensor-based 3D world modeling (3DWM) for providing safe flight guidance in degraded visual environments (DVE). For illustration, we consider the leader-follower scenario, where the leader platform has the perception sensor suite (e.g., LIDAR, RADAR, Optical Structure from Motion (SfM)) used to create a dynamic 3DWM, depicting objects in the environment. The 3DWM is then distributed to the follower platform, for use in pilot cueing in DVE to avoid obstacles or for pilot workload reduction. Leader navigation state errors can cause inaccurate placement of free/occupied space in the common mapping frame, which can lead to a safety-critical failure to avoid obstacles. To ensure safe obstacle avoidance, an overbound on the leader’s navigation errors relative to the common mapping frame must be known with high confidence. A similar overbound must also be established for the follower vehicle. To support this need for high-integrity navigation, this paper adapts existing high-integrity navigation standards as a framework for this scenario. Based on this framework, a sample error decomposition is performed. Potential navigation solutions that meet these example requirements are defined. Finally, modifications needed to the 3DWM measurement update process to accurately represent navigation uncertainty in the 3DWM are highlighted.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years