SignificanceFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been widely used to assess brain functional networks due to its superior ecological validity. Generally, fNIRS signals are sensitive to motion artifacts (MA), which can be removed by various MA correction algorithms. Yet, fNIRS signals may also undergo varying degrees of distortion due to MA correction, leading to notable alternation in functional connectivity (FC) analysis results.AimWe aimed to investigate the effect of different MA correction algorithms on the performance of brain FC and topology analyses.ApproachWe evaluated various MA correction algorithms on simulated and experimental datasets, including principal component analysis, spline interpolation, correlation-based signal improvement, Kalman filtering, wavelet filtering, and temporal derivative distribution repair (TDDR). The mean FC of each pre-defined network, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and graph theory metrics were investigated to assess the performance of different algorithms.ResultsAlthough most algorithms did not differ significantly from each other, the TDDR and wavelet filtering turned out to be the most effective methods for FC and topological analysis, as evidenced by their superior denoising ability, the best ROC, and an enhanced ability to recover the original FC pattern.ConclusionsThe findings of our study elucidate the varying impact of MA correction algorithms on brain FC analysis, which could serve as a reference for choosing the most appropriate method for future FC research. As guidance, we recommend using TDDR or wavelet filtering to minimize the impact of MA correction in brain network analysis.
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an optical imaging technique for assessing human brain activity by noninvasively measuring the fluctuation of cerebral oxygenated- and deoxygenated-hemoglobin concentrations associated with neuronal activity. Owing to its superior mobility, low cost, and good tolerance for motion, the past few decades have witnessed a rapid increase in the research and clinical use of fNIRS in a variety of psychiatric disorders. In this perspective article, we first briefly summarize the state-of-the-art concerning fNIRS research in psychiatry. In particular, we highlight the diverse applications of fNIRS in psychiatric research, the advanced development of fNIRS instruments, and novel fNIRS study designs for exploring brain activity associated with psychiatric disorders. We then discuss some of the open challenges and share our perspectives on the future of fNIRS in psychiatric research and clinical practice. We conclude that fNIRS holds promise for becoming a useful tool in clinical psychiatric settings with respect to developing closed-loop systems and improving individualized treatments and diagnostics.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.