Paper
1 November 1990 Anatomy-sensitive optimization of edge-detection algorithms for MR images of the lower spine
Michael P. Chwialkowski, Sourabh Basak, Dennis P. Pfeifer, Robert W. Parkey, Ronald M. Peshock M.D.
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Due to the relatively large voxel sizes of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) the organ boundaries represent an anatomy dependent mixture of multiple tissue types. Subsequently the image properties at the organ boundaries are highly inconsistent causing failure to produce closed organ contours using classical edge detectors. While it is widely recognized that solving of the boundary closure problems in MRI is essential for the automated 3-D volumetric reconstruction and quantification of the humananatomy only a few successful attempts have been reported in the past2''3''4''5. In this paper a new concept is presented which uses the incremental estimation of an edge by multi-pass application of a nonlinear multi-parameter edge detection operator. The operator is optimized using a quality criterion which estimates the continuity of the detected edges either directly based on a morphological prototype of the organ of interest or indirectly based on the percentage of fragmented edges found in an edge-enhanced image. Usefulness of the method is demonstrated on MR studies of the lower spine and human wrist.
© (1990) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Michael P. Chwialkowski, Sourabh Basak, Dennis P. Pfeifer, Robert W. Parkey, and Ronald M. Peshock M.D. "Anatomy-sensitive optimization of edge-detection algorithms for MR images of the lower spine", Proc. SPIE 1349, Applications of Digital Image Processing XIII, (1 November 1990); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.23559
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Magnetic resonance imaging

Edge detection

Bone

Image processing

Binary data

Spine

Digital image processing

Back to Top