Removal of intrinsic brain tumors, particularly gliomas, is a challenging process, and requires careful consideration to selectively and completely remove tumor tissue, thus improving outcome without damage to healthy brain.1 Surgical guidance is currently assisted by a variety of imaging techniques, such as pre- or intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT), intraoperative ultrasound, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescent imaging,2 and reflectance spectroscopy,3 many of which have been shown to improve patient prognosis4,5 by ensuring maximal resection of radiologically identified tumor. Optical biopsies using Raman spectroscopy have been demonstrated to be a less invasive and potentially more effective alternative to traditional biopsy for a number of different applications,67.–8 and potentially offer a reliable and lower cost method of identifying residual tumor intraoperatively, as well as defining apparent tumor edges.9 This is especially relevant to glial tumors in which edges are invasive and indistinct. In addition, an alternative to traditional biopsy is particularly important for pontine tumors due to their location in the brain stem, where any removal of tissue carries a risk of irreversible damage to the patient.
To perform “optical biopsies” in vivo, small Raman spectroscopy probes are typically required to efficiently collect a spectrum in situ. A variety of such probes for different applications have been constructed, and shown to be effective in providing spectra information of clinical value.1011.12.13.14.184.108.40.206.–19
Optical fibers are an efficient method of guiding light where physical dimensions are constrained; for this reason, the majority of compact Raman probes employ fibers to carry the laser light to the sample and the Raman scattered photons back to the spectrometer. However, these fibers impart a background Raman spectrum of silica onto the spectrum of the sample, and hence Raman background caused by silica is an issue that affects most Raman probes.20 This silica background is shown in Fig. 1. The silica background is present at all Raman shifts, but is particularly prevalent at low wavenumbers. While background subtraction can be performed after collection of the spectra, this masks the problem rather than truly removing it, and care must be used in its application to prevent artefacts that confound statistical analysis occurring on the spectra. Additionally, as the total number of background counts is increased for a given amount of Raman signal, the shot noise is also increased, leading to a reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This problem can be avoided by restricting analysis to higher wavenumber regions (above ),21,22 away from the silica fluorescence, but this risks losing some valuable chemical information at lower wavenumbers. Brain tissue in particular contains peaks potentially useful for classification at Raman shifts of ,23 and possibly lower.
There are a number of techniques that can be used to reduce the background in a probe while still meeting the requirements for small dimensions. Some groups have used hollow-core waveguides to reduce the silica signal,24,25 but as these use a metal coating to guide the light rather than total internal reflection with an associated attenuation of the signal, resulting in long () acquisition times.
Hollow-cored photonic crystal fibers (PCF) have been used26,27 to replace the excitation and collection fibers, but these are expensive and difficult to work with due to small core diameters and limitations of the range of wavelengths they will accept.
In this paper, we demonstrate a miniature Raman probe design that uses an alternative approach: reducing the background by avoiding the use of fibers in the main section of the probe altogether, thus reducing the internal Raman background but also eliminating the need for additional components to be inserted into the brain.
Design and Construction
The probe is designed to collect Raman scattered light from within a standard stereotactic brain biopsy needle (AD-TECH medical). A picture of the assembled probe is shown in Fig. 2. The stereotactic needle is 200-mm long and 2-mm diameter.
The optical configuration of the probe is shown in Fig. 3. The probe employs a miniaturized version of “standoff” Raman probe, replacing the optical fibers with a collimated beam to direct the light down the biopsy needle. It uses a single- or few-mode fiber connected to an aspheric lens (Thor Labs model C430TME-B) for collimation of the excitation laser. This serves to reduce divergence within the probe length, and produce the desired 1.8-mm spot at the sample.
Throughput of a probe is defined largely by its optical geometry, or etendue. This is a measure of the total light flux that can pass through an optical system. Etendue is conserved in any optical system, so the element of the design with the smallest etendue limits the overall light throughput; for this probe, this is the hollow needle section, and for many other probes, it is the optical fibers.
The etendue () captures this total flux by summing the total area () and range of solid angles () that light can pass through in an optical system.
This is represented below. The elemental etendue of a system is the product of the elements of area and . The total etendue is found by integrating this over all angles and area28
For a conical beam of light area bounded by angle , this becomes
For an optical fiber, the small angle approximation can be used [for small numerical apertures (NA)] to simplify the expression to
For the tube in the miniature standoff probe, we must find the amount of light that can pass from one end of the tube to the other. To collect light from an uncoated tube as used in a biopsy needle, there is a negligible component from reflections on the tube walls (waveguiding). In this case, the geometric etendue () is found by the “view factor” from a disk of area representing the entrance of the tube, to another identical disk at the other end. This is expressed as follows:29
Example numerical etendues for common fiber diameters and the miniature standoff probe are shown in Table 1.
Example etendues. The miniature standoff probe has a slightly better throughput compared to a 40-μm fiber, but lower throughput than larger fibers.
|Probe||Etendue (m2 sr)|
|200-μm fiber (needle probe)||3.95×10−9|
Comparison of quantitative peak to background and peak to noise ratios, at 30-s collection time and 20-mW laser power. The Raman peak (measured at 385 cm−1) to background is improved by a factor of around five, and peak to noise is similar between the two probes. Despite a lower throughput, performance is maintained due to greater collection area and a lower internal silica background.
Thus by using the full area of the tip, the total light throughput (etendue) is comparable to a fiber of NA 0.2, despite the reduced numerical aperture of 0.005. The design thus has the advantage of employing no optics at the distal end; the only component at the tip is the steel biopsy needle, which is already approved for medical use. There is an overall light throughput penalty compared to a fiber-based probe in a similar package (equipped with fibers), however, the reduced unwanted Raman background results in a similar SNR to a comparable needle probe (Table 2).
The probe operates at an excitation wavelength of 830 nm to minimize the sample fluorescence.
A dichroic beamsplitter (Semrock, Inc. model LPD01-830RU-25) is used to reflect the laser light down the needle, but allow the longer Raman wavelengths to return toward the spectrometer. An additional long wavelength pass filter (Semrock, Inc. model LPD02-830RU-25) further removes unwanted elastically scattered light from the Raman signal before the collected light is passed into another lens (Thor Labs model F220FC-780), which focuses light into a diameter fiber. A laser cleanup filter is (Semrock, Inc. model LL01-830-12.5) also fitted after the laser collimator.
The probe is attached to a Raman explorer spectrometer (Headwall Photonics) and iDus 420BR-DD (Andor Technology) camera controlled with Solis software (Andor Technology).
Testing and Results
The probe was tested using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) reference sample, and compared to a fiber-based needle probe. Fiber background is sample dependent, with reflective samples causing more laser radiation to return into the probe and hence generate significantly more internal Raman background than transmissive (e.g., liquid) samples. PTFE was chosen in this case as it represents a compromise between these two extremes. The needle probe is constructed from low-OH silica fibers of numerical aperture 0.22- and diameter. Full details of this probe are described by Day and Stone.30 Both probes were connected to the same Raman explorer spectrometer (Headwall Photonics) and iDus 420BR-DD (Andor Technology) camera, via a 1.5-m fiber patch cable. As this patch cable is behind the dichroic filters, it has negligible impact on the internal silica Raman signal generated within the probes. Laser power at the sample was identical between probes (20 mW, 830 nm at the sample), and acquisition time was set to 30 s for both probes.
Figure 4 shows a PTFE spectrum taken with the miniature standoff Raman probe, a fiber-based needle probe of the same length (20 cm), as well as reference spectrum acquired using a Renishaw RM1000 Raman microscope (, 633 nm, 10-s integration time, objective). In addition, a spectrum from a commercially available Raman probe (BAC101, B&Wtek, Inc.) is included for reference, although this probe is a much larger handheld Raman probe and would be unsuitable for this application. The spectra are scaled by the principal peak at , which represents the collection performance of desired Raman signal from the sample for each of the probes. The background from the silica of the fiber causes significant additional background at low wavenumbers in the needle probe and the commercial BAC101 probe. In contrast, the miniature standoff Raman probe has a relatively flat background. Peak to background between the needle probe and miniature standoff probe is improved by a factor of five at . The SNR, calculated from the ratio of the height of the peak to the standard deviation of the baseline at , is similar between the two probes (Table 2).
Use on Porcine Brain
To demonstrate the effectiveness of the probe on biological samples, it was used to distinguish between different types of healthy brain tissue. Spectra were acquired from porcine brain tissue (obtained from pigs destined for human consumption). One hundred and twenty spectra were acquired of white matter, gray matter, and blood vessels (identified by eye) from a pig brain. A laser excitation of 20 mW at the sample was used, and an acquisition time of 60 s. Laser power was restricted to 20 mW due to limitations in available equipement. These spectra are shown with background subtraction applied in Fig. 5, and without subtraction in Fig. 6. The sample fluorescence has been removed from these spectra using a gradient domain approach (outlined in Zhao et al.31) for clarity. These spectra exhibit the expected Raman bands from brain tissue, previously reported in the literature,23 with cholesterol (430, 705, ), fatty acid (1130, 1298, ), ceramide (), and sphingomyelin () Raman peaks all visible. It is also immediately apparent that there are discriminatory differences below , a region where the silica background of the needle probe is very prevalent, and hence this spectral information would typically be discarded.
Summary and Conclusions
A miniature Raman probe without fibers in the distal portion of the probe was demonstrated. It employs an approach not previously demonstrated in a Raman probe of this size. By using a collimated beam instead of optical fibers, some throughput is exchanged for a lower background, which can be useful in certain applications. An example of this is brain tissue where there are Raman signatures present at low wavenumber shifts. While this tradeoff will not be advantageous in all applications, this design offers another option for probe designers in applications where silica background is problematic, or where it is necessary to collect signal from within a needle without optical components at the tip. Additionally, the large spot size at the tip results in a low power density reducing the potential for harm to tissue. Flexibility is not a requirement for use with a stereotactic brain biopsy system, and the miniature standoff design is not flexible as a result; this could be a disadvantage in other applications. The lack of silica fibers greatly increases the medical compatibility of the probe, requiring no additional components to be inserted into the patient. The probe was compared to a silica fiber-based needle probe of similar dimensions, and shown to have similar signal-to-noise performance but much lower background at low wavenumbers, which allows features below to be more readily investigated. The suitability of the probe for classification of brain tissue was also demonstrated using porcine tissue. It is anticipated that the probe will be used in the future for optical biopsy of human brain tissue for identification of brain tumor tissue.
The authors would like to thank Severnside Alliance for Translational Research (SATRE) Bio-E initiative and EPSRC for funding this research. Original data for this project is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5523/bris.zwbmwp6hzes41dhyv2xvz14i1.
W. Stummer et al., “Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial,” Lancet Oncol. 7, 392–401 (2006).LOANBN1470-2045http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9Google Scholar
S. A. Toms et al., “Intraoperative optical spectroscopy identifies infiltrating glioma margins with high sensitivity,” Neurosurgery 57, 382–391 (2005).NEQUEBhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.000176855.39826.2DGoogle Scholar
N. Haberland et al., “Neuronavigation in surgery of intracranial and spinal tumors,” J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 126, 529–541 (2000).JCROD71432-1335http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004320000122Google Scholar
D. I. Ellis et al., “Illuminating disease and enlightening biomedicine: Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool,” Analyst 138, 3871–3884 (2013).ANALAO0003-2654http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3an00698kGoogle Scholar
I. Barman et al., “Application of Raman spectroscopy to identify microcalcifications and underlying breast lesions at stereotactic core needle biopsy,” Cancer Res. 73(11), 3206–3215 (2013).CNREA80008-5472http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2313Google Scholar
M. Kirsch et al., “Raman spectroscopic imaging for in vivo detection of cerebral brain metastases,” Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 398, 1707–1713 (2010).ABCNBP1618-2642http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4116-7Google Scholar
L. M. Almond et al., “Assessment of a custom-built Raman spectroscopic probe for diagnosis of early oesophageal neoplasia,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 081421 (2012).JBOPFO1083-3668http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.081421Google Scholar
L. M. Almond et al., “Development of fibre-optic Raman probes for in vivo diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers,” Spectrosc. Eur. 23(3), 3–6 (2011).SPEUEF0966-0941Google Scholar
J. Mo, W. Zheng and Z. Huang, “Fiber-optic Raman probe couples ball lens for depth-selected Raman measurements of epithelial tissue,” Biomed. Opt. Express 1, 17–30 (2010).BOEICL2156-7085http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.1.000017Google Scholar
A. Mahadevan-Jansen et al., “Rapid communication development of a fiber optic probe to measure NIR Raman spectra of cervical tissue in vivo,” Photochem. Photobiol. 68(3), 427–431 (1998).PHCBAP0031-8655http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb09703.xGoogle Scholar
O. Stevens et al., “Developing fibre optic Raman probes for applications in clinical spectroscopy,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 1919–1934 (2016).CSRVBR0306-0012http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00850FGoogle Scholar
J. Ma and Y. S. Li, “Fiber Raman background study and its application in setting up optical fiber Raman probes,” Appl. Opt. 35, 2527–2533 (1996).APOPAI0003-6935http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.002527Google Scholar
S. Koljenović et al., “Raman spectroscopic characterization of porcine brain tissue using a single fiber-optic probe,” Anal. Chem. 79, 557–564 (2007).ANCHAM0003-2700http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0616512Google Scholar
L. F. Santos et al., “Fiber-optic probes for in vivo Raman spectroscopy in the high-wavenumber region,” Anal. Chem. 77, 6747–6752 (2005).ANCHAM0003-2700http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0505730Google Scholar
M. Bass, J. M. Enoch and W. L. Wolfe, Handbook of Optics, McGraw-Hill, Inc. (2000).Google Scholar
A. Bejan and A. D. Kraus, Heat Transfer Handbook, Vol. 1, Wiley (2003).Google Scholar