Translator Disclaimer
Open Access
9 April 2015 Detection and quantification of dental plaque based on laser-induced autofluorescence intensity ratio values
Betsy Joseph, Chandra Sekhar Prasanth, Jayaraj L. Jayanthi, Janam Presanthila, Narayanan Subhash
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of laser-induced autofluorescence (LIAF) spectroscopy to detect and quantify dental plaque. LIAF spectra were recorded in situ from dental plaque (0–3 grades of plaque index) in 300 patients with 404 nm diode laser excitation. The fluorescence intensity ratio of the emission peaks was calculated from the LIAF spectral data following which their scatter plots were drawn and the area under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated. The LIAF spectrum of clinically invisible grade-1 plaque showed a prominent emission peak at 510 nm with a satellite peak around 630 nm in contrast to grade 0 that has a single peak around 500 nm. The fluorescence intensity ratio (F510/F630) has a decreasing trend with increase in plaque grade and the ratio values show statistically significant differences (p<0.01) between different grades. An overall sensitivity and specificity of 100% each was achieved for discrimination between grade-0 and grade-1 plaque. The clinical significance of this study is that the diagnostic algorithm developed based on fluorescence spectral intensity ratio (F510/F630) would be useful to precisely identify minute amounts of plaque without the need for disclosing solutions and to convince patients of the need for proper oral hygiene and homecare practices.

1.

Introduction

Periodontal disease is the most common cause of tooth loss among adults and its primary etiologic factor is dental plaque. Studies have shown that as early as 2 to 4 h after oral prophylaxis or tooth brushing, the pioneer bacteria (Streptococci) cover about 30% of the enamel.1 Therefore, early identification and meticulous removal of plaque are essential for preventing periodontal disease and maintaining periodontal health.

However, identification of dental plaque is difficult for both patient and dentist because the tooth and dental plaque often look alike, especially if plaque is present in scanty amounts. Traditionally, dental plaque is often detected by clinicians either directly using an explorer2 or with the help of a disclosing solution3 and is quantified using indices based on the area of tooth covered or its thickness. But these assessment methods have the limitation of being subjective, therefore, results may vary from clinician to clinician, especially when the plaque is scanty. Recording indices may also need extensive calibration among examiners for high precision and reliability, which could be quite time consuming and costly.4 On the other hand, disclosing agents used to stain mature and newly formed plaques differently lack specificity. It can stain oral mucosa and lip, though temporarily, which is a major esthetic issue. Fluorescent dyes,5 automated techniques using computers,6,7and plaque quantification using three-dimensional co-ordinates8 have also been described in the literature but the complexity of the methods, cost of equipment, standardization of the techniques, etc., are some of the major drawbacks in the popularization of these methods. Thus, there is a need to develop a cost-effective and noninvasive technique to more objectively detect and quantify dental plaque accumulation, especially during early stages of plaque formation.

Laser-induced autofluorescence (LIAF) spectroscopy is evolving as a powerful tool to detect and characterize biochemical and morphological changes occurring in the human body based on the changes in the fluorescence signatures.9 In dentistry, LIAF spectroscopy has been effectively used for early detection of oral cancer1012and tooth caries.1315 Mature dental plaque has been identified by the red fluorescence emission caused by the bacteria porphyrins in a few in vitro studies.16,17 Few imaging systems such as plakScope home plaque tester and Vistacam intraoral camera are available on the market to visualize plaque, but may not be useful to visualize plaque accumulation in relatively inaccessible areas such as the palatal aspect of upper anterior teeth or the buccal aspect of posterior teeth due to the curvature of the dental arch. Although the SopraCare imaging system was used very recently to discriminate plaque and gingival inflammation,18 the sample size was not large enough to provide information about its diagnostic accuracies in a clinical scenario.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using LIAF for detection of clinically invisible dental plaque and to develop an LIAF ratio reference standard to discriminate between plaque-free tooth surface and clinically invisible early stage dental plaque. Plaque of grades 2 and 3 that can be clinically visualized was also characterized using LIAF and compared to evaluate the variability between different grades. Toward this, the in vivo LIAF spectra from tooth surfaces with grade-0 plaque (control) and 1 to 3 grades of plaque (test group) were recorded in 300 patients and the diagnostic accuracy of LIAF spectral ratio reference standard to discriminate between different grades of plaque is evaluated and presented.

2.

Material and Methods

2.1.

Clinical Protocol and Subjects

The study population consisted of 300 patients (200 in a standard set and 100 in a validation set) who participated in our study at the out-patient clinic of the Department of Periodontics at Government Dental College (GDC), Trivandrum from June 2011 to June 2013. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Government Dental College (GDC), Thiruvananthapuram (Approval No. IEC/C/42-A/2011/DCT/dated 18-01-2011). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their enrollment in the study.

200 subjects aged between 18 to 65 years were selected based on the presence of 0 to 3 grades of plaque according to the plaque index (PI) of Silness and Loe.19 Consecutive series of patients who had the presence of varying grades of plaque at the gingival margin were enrolled in the study with 50 patients in each group namely, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Recruitment of patients for the study.

JBO_20_4_048001_f001.png

A disclosing solution was used to ascertain grades 0 and 1 after the fluorescence spectra were collected from these sites. While allocating participants to various groups, those without any visible plaque at the gingival margin were included as control (grade 0). However, after recording the LIAF spectra, the disclosing solution was used to confirm grade-0 plaque. Participants with calculus and cementum exposed tooth were excluded as these could possibly influence the emission spectra.20 Pregnant women, smokers, and those with any systemic conditions, history of antibiotics, mouthwashes, or any periodontal treatment during the last 3 months were also excluded because these factors are known to influence the quality and quantity of plaque.21 Clinical validation of the results was carried out on 100 participants in the age group of 18 to 65 years, categorized into four groups of 25 patients each according to PI by a member who was blinded to LIAF test results.

2.2.

Recording of Laser-Induced Autofluorescence Spectra and Plaque Index

The fluorescence spectra were recorded from the gingival third of the maxillary central incisors in all the 300 patients using a portable LIAF spectroscopy system schematically shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic of the experimental setup for laser-induced autofluorescence (LIAF) spectral measurements.

JBO_20_4_048001_f002.png

The system consisted of a 404 nm diode laser for excitation of fluorescence and a miniature fiber-optic spectrometer (Ocean Optics, Model: USB 2000FL VIS-NIR) connected to the USB port of a computer to record the spectrum from gingival plaque. One leg of the bifurcated optical fiber (400-μm diameter) guides the light from the laser to the plaque surface through a hand-piece made of stainless steel while another fiber of the same diameter kept beside the excitation fiber collects the fluorescence signal from plaque to the spectrometer through a long wavelength pass filter (Schott GG420). The black disposable polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sleeve inserted at the probe tip helps to prevent external room light from entering into the spectrometer and control infection. Nonetheless, the stainless steel probe tip was sterilized after every use.

The participants were advised to rinse their mouth with distilled water to exclude any chance of fluorescence from food debris. An experienced periodontist identified the site for measurement and places probe tip on the plaque at the gingival margin without disturbing the plaque or gingiva while a physicist, well trained in optical spectroscopy, recorded the spectral data from each patient. In order to standardize, the plaque on the buccal aspect of the maxillary central incisor in each patient was graded and recorded by another experienced periodontist using a mouth mirror and explorer. Since the clinical assessment could disturb the plaque deposits, spectral readings were always recorded first. Patients were given a code number and the periodontist assessing the PI (reference test) was masked about LIAF measurements.

Although various methods for detection of gingival plaque are available, the PI by Silness and Loe was taken as the reference standard in this study due to its wide acceptance for measuring the thickness of plaque at the gingival margin.

2.3.

Data Acquisition and Processing

Accumulated plaque along the gingival margin was illuminated with the 404 nm laser and the LIAF spectrum was recorded in the 400 to 800 nm spectral range using the OOI Base32 software (Ocean Optics). Before using, the fiber-optic light coupler was aligned to provide a Gaussian beam at the fiber tip. The average output power at the illumination fiber tip was monitored before each set of measurements on a subject and was maintained at 1±0.5mW using an optical power meter (Ophir, Israel, Model: Nova) fitted with a PD 300 photodiode head. The LIAF spectra were recorded with an integration time of 50 ms. The PVC sleeve on the tip of the hand piece was placed in contact with the tooth surface and fluorescence spectra were recorded by point monitoring with an integration time of 50 ms. Each day, the background spectrum was recorded prior to measurements and the software automatically subtracts this from the recorded spectrum. Due to the diverse nature of plaque deposits, 15 sets of LIAF measurements were taken from each site and the mean value from each site was determined for further analysis.

Fluorescence intensity (FI) ratios were calculated using the intensity values of peaks observed at 510 and 630 nm in the LIAF spectra. The mean LIAF spectral intensity over an interval of 20 nm (standard deviation) at the emission peak was used to determine the LIAF spectral ratio (F510/F630) from the recorded spectra. Further, the ratio was correlated with the clinical plaque score of the study population for discriminating different grades of plaque from grade 0 (absence of plaque) to grades 1, 2, and 3 (presence of plaque).

Following this, the discrimination of different grades of plaque (0 to 3) at the gingival margin and tooth surface was done using FI scatter plots based on spectral intensity values. A scatter plot of the fluorescence intensity ratio (F510/F630), also known as the fluorescence ratio reference standard (FRRS), is drawn from the raw spectral data from 150 sites with plaque (grades 1 to 3) and 50 sites without plaque (grade 0). A blind trial was also carried out on 100 participants to test the clinical validity of the FRRS developed. The values of the F510/F630 ratio calculated for 100 participants (25 in each group) in the blind set are also inserted in the FRRS for comparison.

The sensitivity and specificity of measurements were determined considering the PI scores by Silness and Loe as the gold standard. Diagnostic accuracies were calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) from the position of intensity ratio (F510/F630) in the FRRS scatter plot with respect to the cut-off values derived from the spectral ratio. The quality/performance of the diagnostic test was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The plot of sensitivity versus 1-specificity, known as the ROC curve, and the area under the curve (AUC), are effective measures of the diagnostic accuracy with meaningful interpretations. The AUC is a reflection of how good the test is at distinguishing (or “discriminating”) between patients with and without disease. The maximum value for AUC=1 which means that the diagnostic test is perfect in the differentiation between the diseased and nondiseased. This happens when the distributions of test results for the diseased and nondiseased do not overlap. AUC=0.5 means the chance discrimination that the curve is located on the diagonal line in the ROC space. The minimum AUC should be considered a chance level, i.e., AUC=0.5, while AUC=0 means the test incorrectly classified all subjects with diseased as negative and all subjects with nondiseased as positive, which is extremely unlikely to occur in clinical practice.

2.4.

Sample Size Calculation

Sample size was calculated based on the equation of Jones et al.22 given below:

Eq. (1)

n=TP+FNP,
where, TP+FN=z2×{[SN(1SN)]/W2}.

In the above equation, TP=true positive, FN=false negative, SN=sensitivity, z=confidence interval for normal distribution value (for 95%, z=1.96), P=prevalence of the condition in the population, and W=accuracy (0.05). Therefore, a minimum sample size of 40 in each group is required to achieve a sensitivity of 97% when the prevalence of supra-gingival plaque is taken as 95%.

2.5.

Statistical Analysis

The LIAF spectral data collected from 0 to 3 grades of plaque were preprocessed by normalization to examine spectral enhancement due to preprocessing.23 The normalized spectral intensity ratio was further subjected to unpaired t test to statistically determine significant differences between the adjoining grades of plaque. As the t test showed significant differences between grade 0 and higher grades of plaque, the normalized data were used for constructing the scatter plot. Cut-off values in the scatter plot between adjoining groups were calculated as the weighted arithmetic mean of the respective groups. In order to assess the performance of the newly proposed algorithm, ROC curves were constructed from the LIAF spectral data. Finally, the area under the ROC curves (AUC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

3.

Results

3.1.

Laser-Induced Autofluorescence Spectral Characteristics

LIAF spectra were recorded from patients who gave written consent to participate in the study and had plaque accumulated at gingival margins with PI grades 0 to 3 (according to Silness and Loe). There were 83 male and 117 female participants in the training set (mean age 43.7±13.5years) while there were 31 males and 69 females in the blind set (mean age 49.1±11.2years).The spectra from each patient were averaged and normalized with respect to the spectral intensity around 510 nm. Figure 3(a) shows the mean LIAF spectra from typical sites with grades 0 to 3 (50 in each group) while Fig. 3(b) shows LIAF spectra after normalization to the intensity of the autofluorescence peak at 510 nm.

Fig. 3

(a) Mean LIAF spectra from typical sites with grades 0 to 3 (50 in each group) and (b) after normalization to the intensity of the autofluorescence peak at 510 nm.

JBO_20_4_048001_f003.png

Fluorescent spectral data revealed noticeable differences between plaque-free tooth surfaces and various grades of plaque. The LIAF spectrum of grade-0 plaque showed a broad emission around 500 nm with a long tail extending toward the red wavelength region. It was found that the FI of plaque-free tooth surfaces was higher than all the other grades of plaque in the 450 to 600 nm range. As the plaque grade (thickness) increased, the FI in the red wavelength region gradually increased with the appearance of another peak around the 635 nm region. With a further increase in the plaque thickness/grade, new peaks started appearing around 685 and 705 nm [Fig. 3(a)]. Figures 4(a) and 4(c) present the clinical photograph of plaque with grades 0 and 1, respectively, while Figs. 4(b) and 4(d) show corresponding photographs after application of the disclosing solution. Grade-1 plaque shows a red-shift of 15 nm for the 510 nm peak as compared to the plaque-free tooth surface of grade 0 as shown in Fig. 4(e).

Fig. 4

Clinical photograph of plaque deposits, (a) with grade 0; (b) after application of disclosing solution on grade-0 plaque; (c) with grade-1; (d) after application of disclosing solution on grade-1 plaque; (e) LIAF changes corresponding to the clinical photographs of grade-0 and grade-1 plaque. Note the red-shift of 15nm for the 510 nm peak for plaque with grade-1 as compared to the plaque-free tooth (grade-0).

JBO_20_4_048001_f004.png

In comparison, the red-shift noticed for the 510 nm peak between grade-1 and grade-2 plaque is 10 nm and between grades 2 and 3 is 5 nm. Concurrently, the intensity of the 635 nm fluorescence peak also increases as the grade of plaque increases from 0 to 3, which could be understood from the fluorescence intensity ratio of this peak with respect to the 510 nm peak.

3.2.

Laser-Induced Autofluorescence Spectral Ratio

LIAF spectral intensity ratio at F510/F630 was calculated from the spectral intensity value of the 510 and 630 nm peaks for various grades of plaque in 200 patients that form the training set for discrimination/classification of gingival plaque. It was observed that the F510/F630 ratio has a decreasing tendency with an increase in gingival plaque thickness. Variation in the spectral intensity ratio values of plaque-free tooth surface (grade-0) with respect to higher grades of plaque are shown in Table 1. These spectral intensity ratio values demonstrate statistically significant changes between different grades of plaque during an unpaired t test (p<0.01) as shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Mean laser-induced autofluorescence spectral ratios from plaque-free tooth surface (grade-0) and higher grades of plaques on tooth surface.

Grades of plaque (PI)F510/F630Percentage variation with respect to grade-0Percentage variation with respect to adjoining lower grade
Grade-08.0±0.5
Grade-12.4±0.370.070.0
Grade-21.4±0.482.541.6
Grade-30.6±0.292.557.1

Table 2

Results of unpaired t test.

Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
F510/F6308.0±0.52.4±0.31.4±0.40.6±0.2
t-value58.0813.5213.05
p-value<0.0005**<0.0005**<0.0005**
Note: **p<0.01

3.3.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Laser-Induced Autofluorescence

A scatter plot of the fluorescence intensity ratio (F510/F630) was drawn for discriminating different grades of plaque (Fig. 5) in 200 patients and the blind data from 100 patients were used for clinical validation. Discrimination lines were drawn in the scatter plot diagrams between grade-0 and grade-1, grade-1 and grade-2, and grade-2 and grade-3 plaques at the weighted arithmetic mean of the adjoining two groups. The results show that the intensity ratio of plaque-free tooth surfaces (grade-0) is higher than those of plaque grades 1 to 3.

Fig. 5

Scatter plot of the autofluorescence spectral intensity ratio F510/F630 for plaque with grades 0 to 3.

JBO_20_4_048001_f005.png

The diagnostic accuracy of using the fluorescence intensity ratio (F510/F630) for discriminating different grades of plaque was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV from the mismatch, if any, from the assigned group/category in the scatter plot. The true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative values of discrimination between the adjoining groups are given in Table 3. With a cut-off value of 5.22, which is the weighted arithmetic mean of F510/F630 values for grades 0 and 1 in the standard set, discrimination between grades 0 and 1 was possible with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 100% and a PPV and NPV of 100% (Table 4). In the blind set, there were also no misclassifications, leading to a value of 100% for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.

Table 3

True-positive, true-negative, false-positive and false-negative cases recorded from spectral ratio.

True positiveFalse positiveTrue negativeFalse negative
Raw spectral data F510/F630Grade-0 plaque versus Grade-1 plaque
Training set500500
Blind set250250
Grade-1 plaque versus Grade-2 plaque
Training set40113910
Blind set1712138
Grade-2 plaque versus Grade-3 plaque
Training set4005010
Blind set250250

Table 4

Independent and overall diagnostic accuracies obtained for discriminating different grades of plaque using fluorescence ratio reference standard (FRRS) ratio derived from spectral intensity ratio.

Raw spectral ratio F510/F630Grade-0 versus Grade-1 (%)Grade-1 versus Grade-2 (%)Grade-2 versus Grade-3 (%)
SeSpPPVNPVSeSpPPVNPVSeSpPPVNPV
Standard set100100100100807878808010010083
Blind set10010010010068525962100100100100
Overall/Total100100100100746569719010010092
Note: sensitivity (Se), true positive/(true positive+ false negative); specificity(Sp), true negative/(true negative+ false positive); positive predictive value(PPV), true positive/(true positive+ false positive); negative predictive value (NPV), true negative/(true negative+ false negative).

With a cut-off value of 1.91, grade-1 plaque could be discriminated from grade-2 with an overall sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 65%, and PPV and NPV of 69% and 71%, respectively. In comparison, with a cut-off value of 1.02, grade-2 plaque could be discriminated from grade-3 plaque with an overall sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%, and PPV and NPV of 100% and 92%, respectively. Table 4 gives the independent and overall diagnostic accuracies achieved.

3.4.

Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

The performance of the diagnostic algorithm for discriminating different grades of plaque was evaluated using ROC curves constructed using the sensitivity and specificity values of detection. The area under ROC curves in Figs. 6(a)6(c) show the discriminatory capacity of the F510/F630 ratio to differentiate between plaque with grades 1 and 2 [AUC=0.89 (95% CI: 0.84–0.94)], grades 2 and 3 [AUC=0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95)], and grades 0 and 1 [AUC=1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00)]. AUC values close to 1 represent a better diagnostic performance.24

Fig. 6

Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showing the discriminatory capacity of the F510/F630 ratio to differentiate between different grades of plaque: (a) grades 1 and 2; (b) grades 2 and 3; and (c) grades 0 and 1.

JBO_20_4_048001_f006.png

4.

Discussion

4.1.

Spectral Characteristics of Different Grades of Plaque

The present study describes the results from the first clinical correlation of 404 nm LIAF spectral intensity ratio (F510/F630) with grades 0 to 3 plaque deposit on tooth. A diode emitting at 404 nm was utilized because this wavelength matches with the strongest absorption band of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) present in the bacterial plaque. The most relevant observation, from a clinical view point, is the potential of LIAF to detect plaque which is usually not visible to the naked eyes. It could be postulated that the marked difference seen in the spectral signature of plaque-free tooth surfaces and those with minute amounts of plaque are due to differences in the fluorophore emission from enamel and bacterial plaque. Endogenous fluorophores in enamel are considered to be responsible for the single broad emission around 500 nm with a long tail extending toward the red wavelength region as seen in the case of grade-0 plaque, which is generally assigned to organic matter embedded in the inorganic calcium apatite semi-crystalline matrix of enamel.25

The appearance of a small peak at 635 nm along with a prominent peak at 510 nm in grade-1 plaque is being reported for the first time. There has been a previous report of immature plaque, especially the streptococcal species (early colonizers) that emit predominantly green spectra.26,27 The emission spectra seen in our study in the case of grade-1 plaque correspond well with this finding. Emission maxima in grade-1 plaque at around 510 nm have been reported to correspond to coenzymes, flavin adenine dinucleotide and flavins, which have several important reactions in bacterial cell energy metabolism.28 Characteristic yellow-green fluorescence is also seen in Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the cells contain a fluorescent siderophore called pyoverdin. Bacteria species such as Veillonella, which is often found in the supragingival plaque, is known to emit red fluorescence, which could be the probable source for the characteristic small peak around 635 nm in grade-1 plaque.29

In contrast, the 510 nm peak, which is prominent in the early stages of plaque formation, was found to decrease in intensity while a new peak gathers in intensity at 635 nm as the thickness of the plaque increases to grade-3. The computed F510/F630 ratio value of 2.4±0.3 of grade-1 plaque shows a decrease of 70% as compared to that of grade-0 (8.0±0.5) plaque, which is clinically invisible. The percentage decrease in F510/F630 ratio of grade-0 with respect to grades 2 and 3 is 82.5% and 92.5%, respectively as shown in Table 1. Since the changes observed in fluorescence intensity ratio values during early stages of plaque formation are quite appreciable as compared to the peak shifts observed at 510 nm, the technique could further be extended to the detection of clinically invisible plaque (grade-0). An increase in fluorescence intensity with increasing plaque amount has also been reported earlier during in vitro studies,4,16,17where orange to red fluorescence is known to be associated with obligate anaerobic bacteria in older plaque and is also used to monitor the degree of maturation of dental microcosm biofilms.30

Endogenous porphyrins and metalloporhyrins, in particular, PpIX, mesoporphyrin, and coproporphyrin synthesized by bacteria in varying amounts, are believed to be the reason for the emission at around 635 nm.9 The prominent red-shift observed in this study in the case of grade-2 and grade-3 plaque is in accordance with the previous reports. The additional peaks in the case of grade-2 and grade-3 plaque around 685 and 705 nm could be attributed to the presence of porphyrins. It has been reported that upon excitation with 405 to 407 nm light, emission maxima at 590, 610, 620, 635, 675, 690, and 705 nm that correspond to porphyrins could be observed.28 It is also reported that the responsible species for these emissions were Prevotella melaninogenica, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans (red and orange fluorescence), and Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococci species (green fluorescence) 31

4.2.

Nature of Fluorescence from Plaque Biofilm

While most of the studies focus on the contribution of bacterial porphyrins in the production of red fluorescence, other endogenous fluorophores are present in the plaque. Fluorescence obtained from suspensions of microbial cells may differ from the actual biofilm seen on the tooth surface because when microbial cells are firmly packed, many additional cellular fluorophores become evident. This is because the fluorescence is the result of interplay between many intrinsic fluorophores and is dependent upon their physical environment within a cell. Variation in the fluorescence properties of plaque between individuals and within the dentition is possible due to the interaction of cell fluorophores and proteins.32 An increase in the fluorescence intensity of NADH has been reported when bound to cellular proteins resulting in a blue-shift of the excitation and emission maxima. A similar blue-shift in the emission maximum of another intrinsic fluorophore, pyridoxal, is also reported when bound to proteins such as phosphorylase.32

When a longer duration and higher intensity of the excitation light are used, there could be a probability of fluorescence signal loss in some cases due to destruction of the excited fluorophore by a process known as photobleaching. However, in the present study, the laser light dose incident on the plaque during each measurement period was 0.2J/cm2, and this radiation dose is too low to cause such damage. Moreover, ratiometric measurements used in this study are also known to eliminate distortions of data, if any, caused by photobleaching.33

4.3.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Laser-Induced Autofluorescence

Another salient feature of our study is that the primary etiologic factor of periodontal disease is identified and quantified unlike other studies where emission from subgingival calculus is studied because plaque is an earlier form of subgingival calculus. There are earlier studies that report a significant increase in fluorescence intensity when subgingival calculus on extracted teeth were irradiated with wavelengths between 360 and 655 nm.20,3437 FRRS has been utilized earlier for developing algorithms for detection and discrimination of tooth caries and oral cancer.1014 This newly developed algorithm based on F510/F630 ratio discriminates plaque with good diagnostic accuracy between different grades, but the most significant aspect is that the algorithm was able to distinguish the early stage of plaque (grade-1) from plaque-free teeth (grade-0) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. As compared to the peak shifts noticed in the 510 nm peak, the decrease in F510/F630 ratio is easily measurable and quantifiable in a clinical setting in real time on patients without the need for any complicated data processing. ROC analysis is usually used in clinical epidemiology to quantify how accurately medical diagnostic tests (or systems) can discriminate between two patient states, typically referred to as “diseased” and nondiseased. The basis for signal detection theory is that nearly all reasoning and decision making takes place in the presence of some uncertainty. Signal detection theory provides a precise language and graphic notation for analyzing decision making in the presence of uncertainty.

4.4.

Clinical Implication of Identifying Grade-1 Plaque in Patients

This is the first clinical study with a sufficient sample size that linked fluorescence spectral measurement to the PI. The presence of supragingival plaque is known to be critical in calculus formation and progression of periodontal disease,3839 and has a marked effect on the subgingival microbiota.40,41 Therefore, preventing plaque accumulation controls gingival inflammation and prevents periodontal attachment loss over a long period of time.42 Clinicians may easily identify visible amounts of plaque corresponding to grades 2 and 3 of the PI. But the most challenging problem for clinicians and patients during home-care is to precisely identify minute amounts of plaque that correspond to grade-1 of the PI. This is largely due to the fact that the tooth and dental plaque often look alike, especially if plaque is present in a scanty amount. Moreover, interproximal plaque formation is visually less evident. Most clinical plaque indices measure a variable on an ordinal scale, whereas an interval scale is more powerful, providing more precise results and reducing subjectivity. We believe that the technique described here based on the FRRS can be used for classification of plaque as it captures the fluorescence from plaque and translates it on a numerical scale as seen in Table 5. It could also be used for the monitoring of supragingival plaque, screening of patients on a regular basis for oral hygiene maintenance and also in clinical research. Plaque control is also helpful in controlling dental caries, malodor (bad breath), and even improves the painful symptoms of oral lichen planus.43 The versatility of the probe makes it possible to use it in any area of the dental arch. Fluorescence diagnosis will also be useful for monitoring the status of teeth before and after scaling, as described in Kurihara et al.

Table 5

Scatter plot cut-off values of fluorescence intensity ratio with respect to PI for classification of dental plaque.

Scatter plot cut-offPI
Above 5.2Grade-0
5.1 to 1.9Grade-1
1.8 to 1.02Grade-2
Below 1.01Grade-3

4.5.

Limitations and Strengths

This study provides a rationale for using the LIAF to detect clinically invisible plaque. The merits of this study include a sufficiently large sample size, stringent selection criteria, and the use of a nonionizing 404 nm wavelength for excitation. Unlike conventional plaque indices, the data here are reliable and reproducible, and can be stored for clinical documentation while visuals of spectral changes in areas of plaque can be used for patient education. The device can be used for objective and precise detection of plaque in clinical and community settings. Further, it would be possible for the patients to directly monitor their oral hygiene status with the help of the digital display corresponding to grades of plaque. However, the results from this system need to be interpreted with care in the case of tooth surfaces with caries, fracture, or extrinsic stains. Grade-1 plaque may be misinterpreted as grade-3 plaque if it has been long standing and matured. It has been found that plaque could mature in about 9 days. While interpreting the results of this study, it should be also be understood that variations in the microbiological compositions of plaque,44 pigmentation, and the use of some toothpastes or prophylaxis pastes45can also cause variations in spectral intensity values.

5.

Conclusion

In periodontal therapy, a major challenge is to effectively identify plaque deposits, both by clinicians and patients, so that disease can be treated effectively and its recurrence controlled. Because of the drawbacks of the existing methods, plaque, especially in minute quantities and during the early stages of formation, could be easily be missed. Within the limitations of the present in vivo study, the results reveal that it is possible to detect different grades of plaque on tooth surfaces including the clinically invisible type belonging to grade-1 from the 404 nm laser-induced LIAF spectral intensity ratio F510/F630. Further, the FRRS developed has the potential benefit of quantifying even minute amounts of plaque in real time, thereby achieving easier plaque detection for the clinician and better plaque control for the patient. Possibilities of accessing periodontal pockets with the LIAF probe to detect subgingival plaque and calculus are envisaged in order to determine the completeness of mechanical therapy.

Acknowledgments

This project was carried out as part of an Indo-Bulgarian collaborative project funded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. The authors are thankful to the director, CESS, and all the staff in the Department of Periodontics, GDC for their support in the conduct of this trial. JJL acknowledges the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for her research associateship. We are also thankful to the postgraduate students of the GDC for their kind cooperation and help.

References

1. 

M. G. Newman et al., Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology, Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA (2011). Google Scholar

2. 

H. Loe, “The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems,” J. Periodontol., 38 610 (1967). http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610 JOPRAJ 0022-3492 Google Scholar

3. 

B. R. Gillings, “Recent developments in dental plaque disclosants,” Aust. Dent. J., 22 (4), 260 –266 (1977). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.1977.22.issue-4 ADEJA2 0045-0421 Google Scholar

4. 

I. A. Pretty et al., “Quantification of dental plaque in the research environment,” J. Dent., 33 193 –207 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.017 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

5. 

N. P. Lang, E. Ostergaard and H. Loe, “A fluorescent plaque disclosing agent,” J. Periodontal. Res., 7 59 –67 (1972). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jre.1972.7.issue-1 JPDRAY 0022-3484 Google Scholar

6. 

K. Carter, G. Landini and A. D. Walmsley, “Automated quantification of dental plaque accumulation using digital imaging,” J. Dent., 32 623 –628 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.06.006 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

7. 

J. Y. Kang et al., “Dental plaque quantification using cellular neural network-based image segmentation,” Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci., 345 797 –880 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37258-5 0170-8643 Google Scholar

8. 

S. Yeganeh et al., “Quantification of root surface plaque using a new 3-D laser scanning method,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 26 692 –697 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.261009.x JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

9. 

K. König and H. Schneckenburger, “Laser-induced autofluorescence for medical diagnosis,” J. Fluoresc., 4 17 –40 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01876650 JOFLEN 1053-0509 Google Scholar

10. 

R. J. Mallia et al., “Laser-induced autofluorescence spectral ratio reference standard for early discrimination of oral cancer,” Cancer, 112 1503 –1512 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142 60IXAH 0008-543X Google Scholar

11. 

R. J. Mallia et al., “Clinical grading of oral mucosa by curve‐fitting of corrected autofluorescence using diffuse reflectance spectra,” Head Neck, 32 (6), 763 –779 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.21251 1043-3074 Google Scholar

12. 

J. L. Jayanthi et al., “Discriminant analysis of autofluorescence spectra for classification of oral lesions in vivo,” Laser Surg. Med., 41 345 –352 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

13. 

N. Subhash et al., “Tooth caries detection by curve fitting of laser‐induced fluorescence emission: a comparative evaluation with reflectance spectroscopy,” Laser Surg. Med., 37 (4), 320 –328 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

14. 

S. S. Thomas et al., “Clinical trial for detection of dental caries using laser-induced fluorescence ratio reference standard,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (2), 027001 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3365945 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

15. 

S. S. Thomas et al., “Characterization of dental caries by LIF spectroscopy with 404-nm excitation,” Laser Med. Sci., 26 (3), 299 –305 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0771-3 LMSCEZ 1435-604X Google Scholar

16. 

M. H. Van der Veen et al., “Red autofluorescence of dental plaque bacteria,” Caries Res., 40 542 –545 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000095655 CAREBK 0008-6568 Google Scholar

17. 

A. M. Lennon et al., “The ability of selected oral microorganisms to emit red fluorescence,” Caries Res., 40 2 –5 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000088898 CAREBK 0008-6568 Google Scholar

18. 

P. Rechmann et al., “SOPROCARE-450 nm wavelength detection tool for microbial plaque and gingival inflammation: a clinical study,” Proc. SPIE, 8929 892906 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2047275 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

19. 

J. Silness and H. Loe, “Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 22 121 –135 (1964). http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016356408993968 AOSCAQ 0001-6357 Google Scholar

20. 

M. Folwaczny et al., “Subgingival calculus detection with fluorescence induced by 655 nm InGaAsP diode laser radiation,” J. Periodontol., 73 597 –601 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.6.597 JOPRAJ 0022-3492 Google Scholar

21. 

G. Alsaadi et al., “Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of failures up to abutment connection with modified surface oral implants,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 35 (1), 51 –57 (2008). JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

22. 

S. Jones, S. Carley and M. Harrison, “An introduction to power and sample size estimation,” Emerg. Med. J., 20 (5), 453 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.5.453 1472-0205 Google Scholar

23. 

N. Ramanujam et al., “Development of a multivariate statistical algorithm to analyze human cervical tissue fluorescence spectra acquired in vivo,” Laser Surg. Med., 19 46 –62 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

24. 

C. E. Metz, “Basic principles of ROC analysis,” Semin. Nucl. Med., 8 (4), 283 –298 (1978). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2 SMNMAB 0001-2998 Google Scholar

25. 

F. Sundstrom et al., “Laser-induced fluorescence from sound and carious tooth substance: spectroscopic studies,” Swed. Dent. J., 9 (2), 71 –80 (1985). SDJOD5 Google Scholar

26. 

L. Coulthwaite et al., “The microbiological origin of fluorescence observed in plaque on dentures during QLF analysis,” Caries Res., 40 112 –116 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000091056 CAREBK 0008-6568 Google Scholar

27. 

E. S. Lee et al., “Association between the cariogenicity of a dental microcosm biofilm and its red fluorescence detected by quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D),” J. Dent., 41 (12), 1264 –1270 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.021 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

28. 

R. Richards-Kortum and E. Sevick-Muraca, “Quantitative optical spectroscopy for tissue diagnosis,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 47 (1), 555 –606 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.47.1.555 ARPLAP 0066-426X Google Scholar

29. 

P. Kolenbrander, “The genus Veillonella,” The Prokaryotes, 1022 –1040 Springer, New York, NY (2006). Google Scholar

30. 

Y. S. Kim et al., “Monitoring the maturation process of a dental microcosm biofilm using the quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D),” J. Dent., 42 (6), 691 –696 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.006 JDENAB 0300-5712 Google Scholar

31. 

S. M. Higham et al., “Application of biophysical technologies in dental research,” J. Appl. Phys., 105 (10), 102048 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3116633 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

32. 

J. R. Lakowicz et al., “Fluorescence lifetime imaging of free and protein-bound NADH,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 89 (4), 1271 –1275 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.4.1271 PNASA6 0027-8424 Google Scholar

33. 

G. T. Hanson et al., “Green fluorescent protein variants as ratiometric dual emission pH sensors. 1. Structural characterization and preliminary application,” Biochemistry, 41 (52), 15477 –15488 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi026609p BIORAK 0006-2979 Google Scholar

34. 

F. Krause et al., “Detection of subgingival calculus with a novel LED-based optical probe,” J. Periodontol., 76 (7), 1202 –1206 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1202 JOPRAJ 0022-3492 Google Scholar

35. 

E. Kurihara et al., “Detection of subgingival calculus and dentine caries by laser fluorescence,” J. Periodontal. Res., 39 (1), 59 –65 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00712.x JPDRAY 0022-3484 Google Scholar

36. 

W. Buchalla, Á. M. Lennon and T. Attin, “Fluorescence spectroscopy of dental calculus,” J. Periodontal. Res., 39 (5), 327 –332 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00747.x JPDRAY 0022-3484 Google Scholar

37. 

Y. L. Qin et al., “Real-time detection of dental calculus by blue-LED-induced fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 87 (2), 88 –94 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.03.002 JPPBEG 1011-1344 Google Scholar

38. 

K. S. Kornman, “The role of supragingival plaque in the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases,” J. Periodontal. Res., 21 (s16), 5 –22 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jre.1986.21.issue-s16 JPDRAY 0022-3484 Google Scholar

39. 

E. F. Corbet and W. I. R. Davies, “The role of supragingival plaque in the control of progressive periodontal disease,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 20 (5), 307 –313 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpe.1993.20.issue-5 JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

40. 

G. Dahlen et al., “The effect of supragingival plaque control on the subgingival microbiota in subjects with periodontal disease,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 19 (10), 802 –809 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpe.1992.19.issue-10 JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

41. 

M. K. Hellstrom et al., “The effect of supragingival plaque control on the subgingival microflora in human periodontitis,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 23 (10), 934 –940 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpe.1996.23.issue-10 JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

42. 

P. Axelsson, B. Nyström and J. Lindhe, “The long‐term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults,” J. Clin. Periodontol., 31 (9), 749 –757 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpe.2004.31.issue-9 JCPEDZ 0303-6979 Google Scholar

43. 

D. S. Salgado et al., “Plaque control improves the painful symptoms of oral lichen planus gingival lesions. A short‐term study,” J. Oral Pathol. Med., 42 (10), 728 –732 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jop.2013.42.issue-10 JPMEEA 0904-2512 Google Scholar

44. 

N. Bjurshammar et al., “On the red fluorescence emission of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans,” Open J. Stomatol., 2 (4), 299 –306 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2012.24052 OJSPAE 2160-8717 Google Scholar

45. 

M. M. Braga, F. M. Mendes and K. R. Ekstrand, “Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions,” Dent. Clin. North Am., 54 (3), 479 –493 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.006 DCNAAC 0011-8532 Google Scholar

Biography

Betsy Joseph is assistant professor of periodontology at the Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Neyyattinkara, Kerala, India, and is pursuing her PhD degree in the Department of Periodontics, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, India. Her research interests include detection of periodontal disease using laser spectroscopy and management of periodontal infections by antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.

Chandra Sekhar Prasanth is presently a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Washington, United States. He received his PhD in physics from the University of Kerala for his research work on multispectral imaging of periodontal inflammation, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, and optical instrumentation. Currently, he is engaged in fluorescence detection of brain tumor margin.

Jayaraj L. Jayanthi is presently working as project scientist at the Crustal Processes Group of the National Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS), Thiruvananthapuram, India. She specializes in development of optical spectroscopy techniques for the noninvasive diagnosis of oral and cervical cancers. She received her PhD in physics from the University of Kerala for her research on early detection of oral cancer using laser-induced fluorescence and diffuse reflectance imaging.

Janam Presanthila is the vice-principal at the Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, and also the head of the Department of Periodontics. She has over 30 years of teaching and research experience in the field of periodontics.

Narayanan Subhash is a scientist with 38 years of research experience in the field of laser spectroscopy and biophotonics. He has a PhD in laser physics from the Cochin University of Science & Technology and a recipient of the Novartis Oration Award (ICMR) 2010, for his contributions in the field of oral cancer detection using laser-induced fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Since his superannuation from the NCESS, India, he is working as a consultant advisor at Forus Health Pvt Ltd., Bangalore, on retinal oxymetry and OCT system development.

© 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1083-3668/2015/$25.00 © 2015 SPIE
Betsy Joseph, Chandra Sekhar Prasanth, Jayaraj L. Jayanthi, Janam Presanthila, and Narayanan Subhash "Detection and quantification of dental plaque based on laser-induced autofluorescence intensity ratio values," Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(4), 048001 (9 April 2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.048001
Published: 9 April 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 15 scholarly publications and 1 patent.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Luminescence

Teeth

Diagnostics

Algorithm development

Laser spectroscopy

Spectroscopy

Calculus

Back to Top