1.IntroductionOver the last few decades, the global incidence of cutaneous melanoma (CM) has continued to rise.1–5 Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States, with high morbidity and mortality.6 While only 2% of skin cancers are diagnosed as melanoma, it accounts for 75% of skin cancer deaths annually.7–10 Melanoma tumor depth is an important prognostic factor, along with ulceration status.11 Early detection and diagnosis is critical.12 The 5-year survival rate is 99% for localized melanomas but decreases to 63% with regional metastases and 20% with distant metastases.8 Biopsies have long been considered the diagnostic standard for melanoma.13,14 Performing biopsies can result in pain, anxiety, scarring, and disfigurement for patients, as well as a considerable cost to the healthcare system. Given the high mortality associated with melanoma depth and metastasis, there is an urgent need for accurate, noninvasive methods to detect and monitor the disease. As a result, several noninvasive imaging techniques have been developed for skin imaging15–17 including, among others, infrared imaging, hyperspectral/multispectral imaging, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT),18–35 and photoacoustic (PA) imaging (PAI).36–40 Many noninvasive imaging modalities have been used to study different aspects of CM, as comprehensively described in review articles.41–43 Beyond their capabilities for an initial diagnosis, other opportunities for melanoma staging through imaging involve analysis of lymph nodes for metastases and detection of circulating (melanoma) tumor cells (CTCs). PAI, also known as optoacoustic imaging, is an emerging noninvasive imaging modality44–52 in which a nano-pulsed excitation light is absorbed by tissue chromophores (such as hemoglobin, lipids, bilirubin, and melanin) or exogenous contrast agents (such as organic dyes or nanoparticles) leading to a transient localized thermoelastic expansion.51,53–58 This induces the generation of PA signals, which are then detected by an ultrasound (US) transducer and reconstructed into a two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) image. The strength of the PA signals correlates with tissue chromophore absorption properties, which depend on the wavelength and the chromophore’s absorption spectrum. The combination of using light illumination and US detection provides PAI with advantages (e.g., high sensitivity and specificity at a greater imaging depth) over other modalities that utilize only light or US for signal generation and detection.39,59 Optical imaging modalities, such as RCM and OCT, have shown the ability to differentiate tissue microstructures; however, they have limited penetration depth due to the scattering of light in tissue,60–62 even with performing enhancement postprocessing algorithms.18,20,63–79 US imaging provides improved penetration depth80 but has limited ability to differentiate between skin conditions.81 PAI can be classified by axial resolution of generated images into PA macroscopy, mesoscopy, and microscopy. Macroscopy utilizes lower US frequencies, which allows for greater penetration depths, in the range of a few centimeters.82–84 This has enabled noninvasive imaging of breast cancer,85 Crohn’s disease activity,86 brown fat metabolism,87 and various blood vessels located in the neck (carotid),88 hands,89 and feet,90 as well as whole-body imaging in animals.91,92 Microscopy utilizes higher US frequencies and allows for imaging with resolution capable of imaging individual cells93–96 but with much lower penetration depth. Mesoscopy is a bridge between macroscopy and microscopy, utilizing US frequencies that image at penetration depths of several millimeters,82 making it optimal for dermatological investigations.97 Mesoscopy has been used to visualize: skin morphology generally,87,98,99 vascular patterns, morphology in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis,100 nailbed microvasculature,101 and vasodilation induced by hyperthermia.102 Another way to classify PAI systems is based on how the image is reconstructed (Fig. 1): in PA tomography (PAT), also known as PA computed tomography (PACT), a reconstruction algorithm is used to convert the PA signals collected at different locations/angles around the object into an image,47,48,103,104 whereas in raster scan PAI, the pixels/voxels of the image are generated as the sample is raster scanned. Based on the arrangement of transducers, PAT can further be categorized into single element PAT, linear array PAT (LA-PAT), ring array PAT, and hemispherical PAT,47,48,103,105,106 but LA-PAT is more widely implemented than other forms. Raster scan PAI has also been implemented in a variety of configurations,47,107–109 which can be divided into optical resolution PA microscopy (OR-PAM) and acoustic resolution PA microscopy (AR-PAM). In OR-PAM, the optical beam is focused to a tight spot, smaller than the acoustic detection sensitivity area and raster scanned point by point using an optical scanner.110–112 With OR-PAM, reaching to the cellular level resolution is achievable; however, the imaging depth is limited to a few millimeters.108 In AR-PAM, a spherically focused transducer scans the sample.110,113,114 This yields a greater penetration depth than OR-PAM but with a coarser resolution. Raster scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM) is an implementation of AR-PAM that has also been used for skin imaging. Because raster scanning images samples point by point, image acquisition can be slow. Configurations for different PA systems (PACT, RSOM, OR-PAM, and AR-PAM) are shown in Fig. 1. A third way to categorize PAI systems is whether they use a single wavelength laser to collect images or multiple wavelengths. In general, a single wavelength cannot distinguish between different chromophores.92 In multispectral PAI (MPAI), two or more wavelengths92,115–119 are used to differentiate between chromophores. For instance, melanin and hemoglobin can be differentiated one from another using 584 and 764 nm.115,116,120 MPAI has been used to study numerous diseases, including prostate cancer,121 glioblastoma,122,123 ovarian cancer,124 thyroid disease,125,126 Crohn’s disease,86 liver disease,127 cardiac injury,128 systemic sclerosis,129 and cutaneous tumors.130,131 In terms of applications, PAI can also be categorized with regards to the type of questions that the imaging modality can be used to answer, namely, fitness of each PAI system to determine: (a) melanoma detection and depth measurement, (b) tumor angiogenesis, (c) lymph node metastases, (d) CTCs, and (e) virtual histology (see Fig. 2). Exogenous contrast agents have also been applied for some of these applications. Hardware designs of selected PAI systems that have been used in some of these applications are shown in Fig. 3. This categorization is consistent with the organization of the paper. 2.MethodsSeveral reviews have been written on skin imaging applications of PAI,45,46,91,145–164 but only one, that we are aware of, on melanoma imaging applications of PAI, and it is restricted to PAT applications and was published several years ago.158 We therefore conducted a literature review of primary research describing PAM and PAT to investigate CM that were published before December 2023. The literature search was conducted using the terms “PA” and “optoacoustic” with “melanoma.” Studies were excluded if they (1) did not utilize PA or optoacoustic methods, (2) were on cancers other than CM, (3) were not in English, (4) were not primary research papers, or (5) did not describe the parameters of the PA system utilized in the study. Our primary source was Google Scholar, which yielded 12,300 total results. Of the 12,300 results, 102 studies103,109,113,115–117,132–140,165–245 met our criteria and are reviewed here. 3.Investigations of CM Using PAI3.1.Melanoma Detection and Depth MeasurementImaging techniques able to detect melanoma with high sensitivity and specificity could greatly reduce the number of biopsies that are currently performed. Once a melanoma is confirmed through detection, the next step is melanoma staging. Staging melanoma is critical since it determines prognosis and treatment options.12 Melanoma depth (Breslow depth) is one of the two variables used to stage localized melanoma;12 the other one is ulceration status. The tumor (T) category of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system depends on tumor depth and is classified as T1 (), T2 (1.01 to 2.00 mm), T3 (2.01 to 4.00 mm), or T4 ().12 For T1 melanomas, the 10-year survival rate is , but drops to 50% for T4 melanomas.12 Excisional biopsy is required for staging lesions to accurately determine the Breslow depth.11,246–250 Imaging modalities could be used to stage melanoma, guide surgical planning, and prevent incomplete excisions and subsequent additional surgeries. 3.1.1.Animal studiesOh et al.116 used dual-wavelength AR-PAM to detect melanoma in mice inoculated with highly invasive B16 skin melanoma cells. Due to the difference in peak optical absorption between melanin and hemoglobin, a near-infrared (NIR) light (764 nm) and a visible light (584 nm) were used to visualize the melanoma [see Fig. 4(a)(i)] and surrounding vascular structures [see Fig. 4(a)(ii)]. Figures 4(a)(iii) and 4(a)(iv) illustrate the B-scan images across the red dotted line in Figs. 4(a)(i) and 4(a)(ii). The maximum thickness of the melanoma was found to be 0.5 mm. Zhou et al.187,188 conducted several experiments to study PAI in nude mice using a similar melanoma model. They used a handheld AR-PAM to measure the depth of melanoma.188 Their PAM utilized an “annular-shaped” light illumination method, in which light (with 8 mm inner diameter and 20 mm outer diameter) bypasses the center of the tumor and instead is delivered in the direction normal to the surface.188 The melanoma depth (3.66 mm) as measured by their system [see Fig. 4(b)] corresponded well to the actual, postexcisional thickness (3.75 mm).188 In another experiment utilizing a LA-PAT system, tumor depth and volume were measured and revealed an increase in tumor depth and volume from day 3 [Fig. 4(c)(i)] to day 6 [Fig. 4(c)(ii)] after injection with the B16 cells.187 The depth increased from 1.32 to 2.77 mm and volume increased from 22.365 to . Moreover, the system was able to measure the rate of growth for both depth and volume of tumor. Recently, Wang et al.184 built a hybrid PA/US system with a sound-light coaxial/confocal design by punching a 2 mm diameter hole in the center of the transducer to deliver the laser light. Melanomas in mice were imaged in vivo at day 7 [see Fig. 4(d)Ii)] and day 30 [see Fig. 4(d)(ii)] after B16 cell injection. A clear growth in tumor size and depth is observed as shown in B-scan images of melanoma at day 7 [see Fig. 4(d)(iii)] and day 30 [see Fig. 4(d)(iv)]. Moreover, PAI visualized microvasculature around the tumor. Another experiment with mice was conducted by Wang et al.251 using a dual-wavelength AR-PAM with visible and NIR light combined with US to image sub-CM. The fused images from the two wavelengths enrich the imaging information and allow more accurate detection of the melanoma, differentiating it from normal tissue. With the 3D distribution the boundary detection of the melanoma is easier and accurate and could be further enhanced by the US structural information helping the identification of the tissue boundaries and precisely locating the sub-CM [see Figs. 4(e)(i)–4(e)(iii)]. 3.1.2.Human studiesIn a pilot study, Zhou et al.135 analyzed 10 melanomas in 7 patients using a LA-PAT system [see Fig. 5(a)] immediately preceding excisional biopsy. Melanomas at depths from 0.2 to 6 mm were visualized, but deeper tumors were beyond the detection limit of the LA-PAT system. Figure 5(a) shows the resultant PA images [see Figs. 5(a)(i) and 5(a)(iv)], photographs [see Fig. 5(a)(ii)–5(a)(v)], and histological images [see Figs. 5(a)(iii) and 5(a)(vi)] of two patients, one with CM metastases on the left lower extremity and the other with primary acral lentiginous melanoma on the right foot. Histological images acquired from both patients showed that the detected melanoma depth was consistent with actual Breslow depth, showing the promising capability of the system for detection. Kim et al.177 developed an integrated PA and US imaging (PAUSI) system by combining a clinical US machine and a multispectral portable laser. The imaging system was utilized to image a patient’s melanoma ex vivo after excision [see Fig. 5(b)(i)]. The amplitude of the PA signal corresponds to the amount of melanocytes in the local area. The PA signals in melanoma, indicated by the white triangles [see Fig. 5(b)(ii)], were predominantly generated by optical wavelengths of 800 and 1064 nm. In contrast, the PA signals from the marking pen regions indicated by the white arrows were predominantly generated from the 680-nm laser. Moreover, PA imaging indicated areas of melanoma that are not visible to the surgeon [yellow triangles in Fig. 5(b)(ii)]. In addition, the measured thickness of the melanoma region () matched well with the histopathological results. A larger study on PAI was conducted by Breathnach et al.115 using LA-PAT and spectral unmixing, to pre-operatively image 32 pigmented lesions suspicious for melanoma in 27 patients. With spectral unmixing, they separated the absorption signature of melanin-containing cells and mapped the spatial distribution of it based on this signature, because the absorption spectrum of melanin varies within the NIR region. The lesion depths measured by PA were highly correlated with histopathologic measurements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 for benign lesions and 0.99 for melanomas. Using the same PA probe, the lesion architecture, adnexal depth (depth of lesion extension into the skin appendages), and various skin layers were also imaged, allowing for differentiation of superficial from invasive lesions based on their dermal-epidermal junction penetration, i.e., lesion penetrated through the dermal-epidermal junction [see Fig. 5(c)]. According to the authors, due to the tissue sample dehydration and loss of skin tension in vivo, PAI overestimated lesion depth as compared with histopathology. Recently, Park et al.133 utilized a 3D multispectral PAT system to noninvasively measure depth and outline the boundary of melanomas for optimal surgical margin selection. Six melanoma patients were examined. They imaged melanoma of various forms, sizes (1.3 to 30 mm for lateral diameter and 0.6 to 9.1 mm for depth), and locations (sole, chest, thigh, heel, and palm) using their multispectral PA/US system [see Fig. 5(d)]. For five of the six case studies, melanoma depth was measured using multispectral analysis and confirmed a high correlation against histopathologic results with a mean absolute error of 0.36 mm. In a signal-based study, Swearingen et al.252 investigated if label-free MPAI could distinguish vascular from pigmented (melanotic) lesions in 15 human patients. Excitation lights at 422 and 530 nm were used. At 422 nm, melanotic lesion showed a lower PA signal [see Fig. 5(e)(i)] compared with vascular lesion [see Fig. 5(e)(ii)]. Similarly, at 532 nm, melanotic lesion showed higher PA signal [see Fig. 5(e)(iii)] compared with vascular lesion [see Fig. 4(e)(iv)]. The experiment proved the ability of MPAI to distinguish between vascular and pigmented lesions. About 15 lesions were biopsied after imaging, revealing 8 vascular and 7 pigmented lesions. Data analysis was carried out via two statistical methods, the classical method (standard multivariate analysis classification techniques) and a Bayesian-model-based approach. The classical method attained a perfect lesion diagnosis rate, whereas the Bayesian approach had a 20% error rate. Figures 4 and 5 and the related text describe results from a selection of PAI studies of melanoma detection and depth measurement. Table 1 includes specific characteristics of the PAI systems used in published studies on melanoma detection/depth measurement for both animal and human studies. Table 1Specific characteristics of PAI systems used in published studies on melanoma detection/depth measurement.
Note: λ, wavelength; F, fluence; CF, central frequency; BW, bandwidth; NE, number of elements; NL, not listed; IA, incident angle; LR, lateral resolution; AR, axial resolution; LA-PAT, linear array photoacoustic tomography; AR-PAM, acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy; OR-PAM, optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy; SW-PAM, subwavelength resolution photoacoustic microscopy. 3.2.Measurement of Tumor Angiogenesis in MelanomaTumor angiogenesis refers to the formation of new blood vessels within a tumor, or the growth of blood vessels between a tumor and its surrounding tissues. Tumor-associated vasculature not only regulates the supply of nutrients and oxygen to the tumor but also expedites tumor invasion and metastasis. Therefore, as an essential indicator of disease progression, vascularization within a tumor can be used to assess the potential for metastasis.184,253 PAI has shown great promise in monitoring the progression of tumor angiogenesis143,254 using OR-PAM and also RSOM in mice and humans (Table 2 and Fig. 6). Table 2Summary of PAI studies on melanoma tumor angiogenesis.
Note: λ, wavelength; F, fluence; CF, central frequency; CW, central wavelength; SB, spectral bandwidth; CL, coherence length; NL, not listed; RSOM, raster scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy; OR-PAM, optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy; RCM, reflectance confocal microscopy; PARS, photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy. 3.2.1.Animal studiesIn one study, Omar et al.182 utilized RSOM to visualize angiogenesis and tumor growth in melanomas of mice in vivo over several days. B16F10 melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously into the mammary fat pad of Hsd: Athymic mice, and tumor growth and angiogenesis were monitored using spherically focused US detectors with central frequencies of 50 and 100 MHz. The 50 MHz detector was superior in imaging larger structures such as larger, oblique blood vessels [see Fig. 6(a)(i)], whereas the 100 MHz detector provided better visualization of tumor [appearing as a black hole in Fig. 6(a)(ii)] and newly sprouting vessels [see Fig. 6(a)(ii)]. Using the 50 MHz detector, tumor growth was recorded at day 2 [see Fig. 6(b)(i)], day 4 [see Fig. 6(b)(ii)], day 7 [see Fig. 6(b)(iii)], and day 9 [see Fig. 6(b)(iv)]. Each subfigure in Fig. 6(b) includes an inset taken from the proximity of the tumor. The growth of the tumor from day 2 to day 9 was illustrated by the growth of the black nonvascularized spot, indicated by a thick arrow in all the subfigures in Fig. 6(b). Moreover, in each inset, it is observed that upon interaction with the tumor, the two big vessels (denoted by a thinner arrow) start re-arranging; at the same time, smaller vessels start growing in that region, clearly representing tumor angiogenesis at a microvasculature level. Zhao et al.185 utilized OR-PAM at two wavelengths (570 and 1064 nm) to study melanoma tumor angiogenesis. B16 melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously into the mouse ear and tumors were imaged on day 9 [see Fig. 6(c)(i)], day 13 [see Fig. 6(c)(ii)], day 14 [see Fig. 6(c)(iii)], and day 15 [see Fig. 6(c)(iv)] after tumor inoculation in two mice. In the earlier day postinoculation, small diameter ( to ) vessels were most prevalent. On the following 2 days, the number of large diameter vessels (50 to ) increased while the proportion of small diameter vessels decreased. On day 15, vessels with diameter were visualized. Moreover, the vessel density, vessel tortuosity, and fractional dimension (quantitative parameters they used to assess tumor growth) also showed an overall upward trend from day 9 to day 15. Thus, the authors concluded that with the growth of melanoma, the vascular networks become stronger and complex, which was consistent with visual results in Fig. 6(c). Another study by Zhou et al.186 used a combined all optical PA microscopy system and RCM system to study tumor growth and angiogenesis in mice who received subcutaneous injections of B16 melanoma cells in the ear. Their PAM showed irregular and linear vascular patterns, likely representing neovascularization of the dermis. The RCM enface image illustrated widespread pagetoid cells with cytologic atypia and nucleated cells within the dermal papilla. The PAM provided significant contrast and penetration depth, based on optical absorption properties, and visualized vascularity and pigmentation, whereas RCM illustrated cytological features. On the other hand, Xu et al.134 developed an integrated OR/AR-PAM system for multiscale imaging capability with high-speed wide-field imaging based on a polygon scanner. The polygon has six aluminum-coated surfaces that reflect the light and the acoustic beams: in this way six repeated cross-sectional scans can be obtained in one rotation of the motor, increasing image acquisition speed. With the two modalities and using two different wavelengths (532 and 1064 nm) a sub-CM is detected and separated from the surrounding microvasculature [see Fig. 6(e)]. 3.2.2.Human studiesRecently, angiogenesis of human melanomas has been imaged by He et al.109 using a single-breath-hold faster RSOM system to visualize the microvasculature of pigmented melanocytic lesion [see Fig. 6(d)]. The images from three different regions: scan 1 inside the lesion [see Figs. 6(d)(i), 6(d)(iv), and 6(d)(vii)], scan 2 in lesion boundary [see Figs. 6(d)(ii), 6(d)(v), and 6(d)(viii)], and scan 3 outside lesion [see Figs. 6d(iii), 6(d)(vi), and 6(d)(ix)], showed a difference on the epidermis and dermis vasculature patterns inside and outside the lesion. From the scans of 10 dysplastic nevi and 10 melanomas, a quantification of the vasculature features was performed to identify biomarkers for melanoma detection. A total of six biomarkers were calculated: the total blood volume, vessel density, average vessel length, tortuosity, fractal number, and lacunarity. It was found that those markers showed differences between malignant and benign lesions, supporting the possibility to use this system to improve melanoma diagnosis. 3.3.Lymph Node MetastasesMelanoma survival rates are high when the disease is caught early, but decrease significantly after nodal or distant metastasis. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the hypothetical first lymph node draining the cancer; SLN metastasis has been shown to predict the pathologic state of the nodal basin.11 An SLN biopsy is typically performed during wide local excision if the Breslow depth is ; moreover, SLN biopsies are considered in ulcerated tumors of any depth.11,255 The SLN for a specific melanoma is identified through pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy, or intra-operatively using either a blue dye injection near the primary tumor site or a gamma probe with technetium-99 sulfur colloid.11 After excision, SLNs are examined via histopathology and immunohistochemistry for metastasis. However, these examinations can miss the presence of metastases due to false negative rates varying from 5% to 21%.256 Once a lymph node is removed, typically 6 to 10 sections of thickness are taken and examined for metastasis. Thus, in a typical node with 1 cm length, there are hundreds of possible sections, only a fraction of which are histologically examined.176 On the other hand, the presence of metastasis in an excised node can be determined by PAI257 since most melanomas are highly melanotic, containing melanin,11 and melanin is a highly absorbing chromophore in NIR range.115 Therefore, SLN metastases can be accurately identified by PAI, leading to appropriate selection of sections for histological examination, mitigating the possibility of false negative results.258 3.3.1.Animal studiesPAI has been studied for the imaging of lymph nodes (Table 3) to identify metastases both ex vivo (postsurgical resection) and in vivo. McCormack et al.176 used a three-single-element-transducer based PAT prior to and after injecting a human melanoma cell line (HS 936) into ex vivo lymph nodes from a healthy canine and pig. The PAT system they used consisted of a diameter optical fiber connected to a tunable laser and an acoustic sensor made from polyvinylidene fluoride film. The 532 nm wavelength light was illuminated from the top of the lymph node, and the PA signals were detected from the bottom [see Fig. 7(a)]. The control lymph nodes (with no injected melanoma cells) showed no PA response [see Fig. 7(a)(i)], whereas the melanoma cells in the excised lymph nodes generated PA signals as shown with the arrow in Fig. 7(a)(ii). A pig lymph node with only 500 injected melanoma cells and a 100 to diameter lymph node produced a PA response. Neuschmelting et al.180 utilized a multispectral (wavelengths 700 to 860 sampled) PAT system with a cylindrically focused transducer array (iThera Medical) and compared it with fluorodexyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for imaging B16F10-derived melanoma micrometastases and macrometastases to lymph nodes and in-transit metastases (metastases moving from the primary tumor to the nearby nodal basin) in mice in vivo. The PAT system detected lymph node micrometastases in the cortical region of lymph nodes (after 2 weeks’ tumor cell inoculation) that were too small for FDG PET/CT to detect. It also delineated in-transit metastases, which were observed as bright clusters between the primary melanoma site and the nodal basin. Both PAT and PET/CT could detect macrometastases [see Fig. 7(b)], but only the PAT system unmixed signals to enable detection of micrometastatic infiltration of melanoma in the cortex of popliteal nodes (white dashed circles). This multispectral PAT system distinguished melanoma lymph node metastases from other neoplastic and nonneoplastic lymphadenopathies (due to melanin’s contrast) but FDG PET/CT could not (due to nonspecific FDG uptake and relatively low resolution). Most recently, Sinnamon et al. utilized a Vevo LAZR PAT system to visualize inguinal lymph node metastases in vivo at 4 and 8 weeks after inoculation with B16 melanoma cells in the flank region in BRaf-PTEN transgenic mice.174,183 In total, 49 lymph nodes were imaged in 25 mice, with metastatic cells present in 17 lymph nodes (35%), with histopathological confirmation. Thus the system was able to image in vivo melanin PA signals of a lymph node containing melanoma metastasis at 60 days after the induction of the tumor [see Fig. 7(c)(i)]. The negative control mouse without tumor induction is shown in Fig. 7(c)(ii). The PA melanin signal within the positive lymph nodes was significantly higher than in the negative control mouse, with no difference in PA signals between the adjacent soft tissue of positive and negative lymph nodes. The strongest predictor of melanoma metastasis was the ratio of lymph node to soft tissue PA melanin peak signal. Table 3Summary of ex vivo and in vivo human and animal PAI studies for detection of melanoma metastasis to lymph nodes.
Note: λ, wavelength; F, fluence; CF, central frequency; BW, bandwidth; NE, number of elements; NL, not listed; LA-PAT, linear array photoacoustic tomography; PAFC, photoacoustic flow cytometry; PAF, photoacoustic finder; AR-PAM, acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy; OR-PAM, optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy; SLN, sentinel lymph node. 3.3.2.Human studiesMany different PAI modalities have been utilized for ex vivo studies of metastases in melanoma SLNs, including LA-PAT and arc-shaped PAT.117,169,174 PAT has also been used for in vivo studies.117 The first human study on melanoma lymph node metastasis was conducted by Grootendorst et al.169 using a curvilinear array. Patients with proven metastatic disease undergoing inguinal or axillary lymphadenectomy were enrolled, and 1 or 2 lymph nodes were randomly selected for ex vivo multispectral analysis. The PA laser was illuminated from the top of the sample and the US detector array was rotated 360 deg around the sample. A total of six lymph nodes were imaged, and PAT revealed that three lymph nodes were metastatic and three were benign. All three malignant nodes (LN1, LN2, and LN3) displayed increased PA signals (from melanoma cells), whereas all three benign nodes had a substantially weaker signal (signal likely from hemoglobin and possibly other chromophores) when imaged at wavelengths from 720 to 800 nm [see Fig. 8(a)]. The results were confirmed through histopathology. Langhout et al.174 used a LA-PAT system and imaged 12 lymph nodes. Histopathology revealed that three nodes were metastatic and nine were benign. Again, melanoma-positive nodes [see Fig. 8(b)(i)] displayed different PA signals (depth image) than benign nodes [see Fig. 8(b)(ii)] due to the difference in melanin distribution. Additionally, total volume imaging to the depth of 2 cm in benign lymph nodes (absent melanin deposits) allowed for computation of the entire nodal volume. The largest human study on PAI of melanoma metastasis to lymph nodes was carried out by Stoffels et al.117 using a multispectral arc-shaped PAT. They analyzed 506 SLNs from 214 patients with a Breslow depth of at least 1 mm: 148 SLNs (from 65 patients) were analyzed by multispectral PAT ex vivo and histology, whereas the other 358 SLNs (from 149 patients) were analyzed by the conventional European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group protocol. Their system detected metastases in 22.9% of excised SLNs compared with 14.2% by the EORTC Melanoma Group protocol. Ex vivo analysis by PAT showed 100% sensitivity and 62% specificity. Then, an in vivo experiment was carried out using PAT and indocyanine green (ICG) (a NIR fluorophore injected peri-tumorally) as a contrast agent to image 41 SLNs in 20 patients. PAT visualized ICG-marked SLNs to the depth of 5 cm (discerned by single photon emission computed tomography/CT) and with 100% concordance with the gold standard of SLN detection, 99 m Tc-nanocolloid–guided lymphoscintigraphy. In vivo PAT analysis revealed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 48.6%. With 100% sensitivity, both ex vivo and in vivo PAT identified noncancerous SLNs in 189 total lymph nodes without any false negatives but with a high rate of false positives. The quantification of melanin was performed with multispectral analysis and then correlated with the localization of metastatic cells [see Fig. 8(c)]. 3.4.Metastases to the Blood: Imaging CTCsCTCs originate in the primary tumor and acquire genetic and structural alterations, leading to changes in cellular signaling and protein expression. This results in bloodstream intravasation and possibly invasion to other organs to develop secondary tumors.259,260 Previous work has shown that CTC assays can predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers.261–263 CTCs can be detected via flow cytometry, which has traditionally involved detecting fluorescent signals from cells labeled with multicolor probes ex vivo, which is known as conventional flow cytometry.264,265 However, this method requires invasive blood extraction from patients and is limited in its ability to detect infrequent CTCs.265 Additional CTC assays have been developed,266 but have not been studied on a large scale, limiting their clinical translatability. Flow cytometry can be done in vivo and noninvasively using PA flow cytometry (PAFC). The concept of PAFC is similar to PAI: an excitation light is absorbed by chromophores in blood cells, causing local thermoelastic expansion and subsequent production of acoustic waves, which can be detected by an US transducer. PAFC configurations are an adaptation of OR-PAM, as high-pulse-repetition-rate lasers are also used in PAFC to generate detectable PA signals from individual CTCs.265 Higher pulse rates improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) through averaging PA signals from individual CTCs; SNR is determined by the ratio of PA signals from individual CTCs to signals from other blood cells and background noise.265 The main chromophore in blood cells is hemoglobin in red blood cells (RBCs), but the main chromophore in melanoma CTCs is melanin. As with many other PAI modalities, in PAFC, multispectral analysis is often used to differentiate hemoglobin/melanin signals in the vasculature. Thus, unmixing of multispectral PA signals can allow for differentiation of CTC signals from oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin.167 Numerous studies, summarized in Table 4, have investigated PAFC to detect melanoma CTCs.137,139,166–168,170–172,178,179,189,190 Table 4Summary of ex vivo and in vivo human and animal PAI studies on melanoma CTCs.
Note: RBC, red blood cell; λ, wavelength; CF, central frequency; BF, broadband frequency; BW, bandwidth; NE, number of elements; NL, not listed; AuNR, gold nanorods; LR, lateral resolution; AR, axial resolution; AR-PAFC, acoustic resolution PA flow cytometry; OR-PAFC, optical resolution PA flow cytometry; SIP-PAT, single pulse panoramic PAT; PVDF, polyvinyledene fluoride; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; CSF, cerebral spinal fluid. 3.4.1.Animal studiesPAFC has demonstrated the ability to detect unlabeled (and labeled) CTCs in the mouse vasculature after injection of CTCs in the tail vein or from inoculation of primary melanoma tumors in the skin or ears.87,167,168,172,189,190 Overall, PAFC accurately detected CTCs from the background RBCs in the mouse vasculature, and PAFC signals increased as metastasis increased.139,167,168,171,172,189,190 Deán-Ben et al.191 employed spherical array PAT for real-time visualization of passage and trapping of individual B16 melanoma cells in the whole mouse brain. Imaging was performed with the laser wavelength and pulse repetition rate set to 700 nm and 50 Hz, respectively. About 100 frames of PA images were acquired before injection of B16 melanoma cells and averaged to determine a baseline. The system could identify and track B16 melanoma cells after injection by taking the difference between before and after images.191 3.4.2.Human studiesGalanzha et al.166 studied CTCs in healthy patients and patients with melanoma using PAFC in vivo. PAFC data from healthy patients were used to calculate false positives and to study PA artifacts.166 PAFC accurately identified unlabeled CTCs in 15/16 melanoma patients.166 The system uses MPAI with one channel for detection of blood and a second channel for melanin. The channels are shown individually and fused together in Fig. 9(a)(i), and fused images showing movement of melanoma CTCs in an artery [Fig. 9(a)(ii)] and a vein [Fig. 9(a)(iii)] are also presented. This system has relatively poor lateral resolution (Table 4), which the authors explain is caused by light beam blurring.166 Recently, PAT systems have also been used to detect CTCs. Hai et al.171,192 employed a LA-PAT system to detect melanoma CTCs in patients in vivo. Based on the optical absorption coefficient ratio, an excitation wavelength of 680 nm was chosen to maximize the contrast between melanoma CTCs and blood and achieve the highest detection sensitivity. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was used to quantify melanoma CTCs from the background tissue (RBCs). From the imaging session of the forearm of a positive patient with stage IV metastatic melanoma, a CTC was detected with a CNR of 9.4 [see Fig. 9(b)]. The single cells were captured at five frames and the flow speed was estimated to be . They imagined 16 stage III and IV melanoma patients and successfully detected suspected melanoma CTCs in three patients. In fact, two of the three had disease progression, but four of those found CTC-negative also had disease progression. The lower rate of CTC detection by LA-PAT compared with PAFC could be attributed to the use of melanin as the single marker to identify and detect CTCs, and the fact that the patients were measured at only one clinical time point instead of on multiple repeat visits.171,192 Also, in the previous study, optical clearing techniques, including microdermabrasion and glycerol sonophoresis, increased PA signals by two- to threefold, due to the reduced light scattering in superficial skin layers.166 PAT has tremendous clinical potential in imaging CTCs and disease monitoring in melanoma, given the fact that PAT can image very deep in the tissue with very high optical contrast. Moreover, utilization of contrast agents for molecular PAI can further increase the sensitivity of PAT to imaging cancer cells that do not express melanin. 3.5.Virtual HistologyRecently, all-optical PA microscopy in reflection-mode has been shown to be able to form histology-like images of various cancers on unstained slides to distinguish tissue types.142,267 The principle behind this technology is that by concurrently measuring radiative and nonradiative (in the form of acoustic) emissions from tissue samples illuminated with light in the UV range (266 nm), it is possible to differentiate DNA, RNA, collagen, and elastin, among other chromophores. Nuclear contrast, in particular, comes from relaxation of DNA, and nonnuclear contrast from relation of extranuclear proteins. These enable high-resolution images remarkably analogous to traditional chemical haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.267,268 This technique has very recently been applied to the analysis of skin biopsies suspected for melanoma.269,270 3.6.Exogenous Contrast Agents for Melanoma DetectionPAI most commonly utilizes intrinsic (endogenous) contrast agents, such as melanin and oxy- and deoxy hemoglobin to assess melanomas.271 However, an exogenous, melanoma-specific contrast agent could assist in assessing early-stage melanomas, tumor staging, surgical excision planning, detection of lymph node metastases, and detection of CTCs. In Table 5, some of these applications are demonstrated. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), due to their intrinsic bioinertness and highly tunable optical properties, have shown remarkable promise in cancer diagnostics and treatment.273 As a contrast agent, AuNPs display optical absorption and scattering cross-sections that are greater than those of organic dyes, making them appropriate contrast agents for several applications in biomedical optics, including PAI. Table 5Use of exogenous PA contrast agents for melanoma detection in mice.
Note: λ, wavelength; CF, central frequency; NE, number of elements; BW, bandwidth; LR, lateral resolution; AR, axial resolution; SR, spatial resolution; NL, not listed; PAI, photoacoustic imaging; AR-PAM, acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy; LA-PAT, linear array photoacoustic tomography; AuNC, gold nanocrystals; MAGE-Au-PFH-NPs, Au nanorods and liquid perfluorocarbon (PFH) conjugated to a MAGE-1 antibody; ID-HCuSNP, hollow copper sulfide nanoparticle; DOX, doxorubicin; ICG, indocyanine green; PAFC, photoacoustic flow cytometry. For example, gold nanorods (AuNRs) have been used to increase optical contrast in CTCs.272,274 Zharov et al.272 used PAFC to detect CTCs (human squamous carcinoma cell line SQ20B) labeled with AuNRs, which were in size and had a maximum absorption at 840 nm. The cancer cells labeled with AuNRs were injected into the mouse circulatory system through the tail vein. The real-time accumulation of AuNRs in the cells was monitored through an increase in PA signal. The maximum absorption contrast introduced by AuNRs compared with background tissue was . The capability of AuNR was compared with that of a conventional contrast agent called ICG. At the same laser energy, linear PA signals from AuNR-labeled cancer cells were five to seven times stronger than the signals from cancer cells stained with ICG. 3.6.1.Animal studiesKim et al.173 studied PA skin imaging of gold nanocrystals (AuNCs) bio-conjugated to -melanocyte-stimulating hormone () and compared them to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-AuNCs. Melanoma cells strongly overexpress α-MSH receptors. In their study, mice were inoculated with B16 melanoma cells and either one or the other contrast agent was injected via tail vein. In vitro studies showed that melanoma cellular uptake of was times greater than PEG-AuNCs uptake after 6- and 24-h incubation periods. In vivo experiments involved two groups of mice: one group () received and the other group () received PEG-AuNCs, both via tail vein [see Fig. 10(a)]. Six hours after injection, the PA signals of AuNCs increased 38%, whereas the PEG-AuNCs increased only 13% [see Fig. 10(a)(iv)]. The number of AuNCs was quantified in the excised tumors using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The mean number of AuNCs per gram of tumor was found to be 360% times greater than that of PEG-AuNCs, indicating the extremely high uptake of by melanoma cells. More recently, Li et al.175 evaluated a nanoparticle composed of AuNRs and liquid perfluorocarbon (PFH) and conjugated it to a monoclonal antibody to melanoma-associated antigens (MAGE-1 antibody) and used an LA-PAT system for imaging. In vitro experiments showed a high number of MAGE-Au-PFH-NPs concentrated in the plasma membrane and cytoplasm of melanoma cells, compared with Au-PFH-NPs (control), which only showed a weak binding around tumor cells. Laser irradiation of nanoparticles with PFH results in a phase change (liquid PFH to gas microbubbles), increasing the acoustic impedance of surrounding tissues and subsequently causing a signal enhancement. In vivo PAI in tumor-bearing mice revealed a significantly higher PA signal intensity 2 h after MAGE-Au-PFH-NPs injection into the tail vein compared to Au-PFH-NPs; higher conjugate concentrations produced greater PA signals [see Fig. 10(b)]. Wu et al.195 developed cell membrane-camouflaging hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles (ID-HCuSNP) by coating the membrane of melanoma cells with doxorubicin and ICG-loaded hollow copper sulfide NPs to enhance their targeting ability. They injected a mouse model with ID-HCuSNP and after 4 h, and they observed a strong local PA signal in the tumor area due to the accumulated NPs.195 This showed cancer cell membrane-camouflaged NPs having an excellent self-recognition ability to the aimed tumor cells in vivo [see Fig. 10(c)]. Galanzha et al.165 used PAT with mapping techniques (multicolor PA lymph flow cytometry, PA lymphography, and absorption image cytometry) to examine metastasis to the prenodal lymph vessels and SLNs in mice ex vivo and in vivo. Specifically, after a visible primary melanoma tumor had developed in the mouse ear, they injected magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) that provided stronger PA signals from lymphatics and SLNs at 639 nm. However, similar NIR absorption spectra of MNPs and melanin made it difficult for spectral identification of melanoma metastasis in the presence of MNPs. To resolve this problem, they used Evans Blue (EB) dye, which absorbs poorly at 639 nm only, while the presence of melanoma cells in lymphatics and in a node was identified through the appearance of PA signals at 850 nm. Because absorption of melanin also occurred at 639 nm above the background from EB dye, they used specific ratio of PA signals at 639 and 850 nm for additional identification of melanoma cells. They injected EB dye near melanomas derived from B16F10 cells and imaged the region in week 1 and 2 postinoculation. The number of metastatic melanoma cells in transit increased from in week 1 postinoculation to in week 2 postinoculation. The percentage of PA signal covering the examined SLN area increased from 6% in week 1 postinoculation to 39% in week 2 postinoculation. In the histology results, lymph nodes showed no metastases after 1-week inoculation and single metastases after 2 weeks inoculation. Thus the PA system was able to detect early micrometastases that could not be visualized in histology, illustrating its ability to detect even single metastatic cells (at week 1 postinoculation). Despite the number of reports on the successful demonstration of Au nanomaterials for cancer theranostics,275,276 accumulations in the liver and spleen due to resident macrophages that form the mononuclear phagocyte system are still an issue.277,278 Armanetti et al.196 utilized endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) to carry AuNPs and explored the antitumor effects and the tumor-homing efficiency following single intravenous injection into tumor-bearing mice. They assessed AuNPs biodistribution in freshly excised mice organs at different time points post administration by exploiting the PA properties of AuNP-enriched ECFCs. They demonstrated in vitro that AuNP-loaded ECFCs are able to generate higher PA signals than AuNPs alone and also display spectral fingerprints that enable a reliable detection of labeled cells following intravenous injection.196 Toxicity is always a concern when developing exogenous contrast agents. Factors for assessing biocompatibility include inertness, metabolism, and effective clearance rates. Material composition, surface modifications, shape, and size must all be designed carefully to maximize biocompatibility. The growing field of PAI for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning is accelerating research in biocompatible exogenous contrast agents.279,280 4.DiscussionThe scalability of PAI technology (from OR-PAM to AR-PAM to PAT) allows a wide range of applications including melanoma detection and depth determination, tumor-related angiogenesis, lymph node metastases, and presence of CTCs, all either with endogenous or exogenous contrast agents. Although these applications have been explored using small animal models for a couple dozen years, in the past decade or so, human observational studies have demonstrated the clinical potential for these systems. Although these technologies need more confirmational human studies, they lay a strong foundation for the near-term translation of PAI systems to the clinic for melanoma disease detection and management. In terms of initial diagnosis and melanoma depth determination, if melanoma is in its very earliest stages (at the epidermis), OR-PAM provides rich information on tumor presence and angiogenesis—therefore, it can be used not only for detection but for accurate treatment planning, as the extent of angiogenesis may predict tumor aggressiveness. AR-PAM could be a better choice for deeper melanomas (approximately ). Although PAT could be implemented using ultrahigh frequency transducers, the use of it to detect and characterize early stage melanomas has not been explored, perhaps due to the requirement for a much-more sophisticated data acquisition system, transducer focal length, and complex light illumination configuration. Another shortcoming of PAT is that it is limited to providing 2D images, unless it is implemented with a scanning system, which adds complexity. Nevertheless, tunable lasers with a wide range of wavelengths (to accurately distinguish melanoma biomarkers such as melanin) are much more accessible for PAT implementation compared to AR/OR-PAM. Therefore, where permitted, high or ultrahigh frequency PAT could be a good choice for melanoma detection and depth determination. Complementing current histopathology of excised tissue, recently, all-optical PA microscopy in reflection-mode has been shown to form histology-like images of various cancers on unstained slides to distinguish tissue types. This technique has great potential to be in the clinic for rapid dermatological tissue analysis. Once a melanoma is appropriately detected, knowing whether it has metastasized to the SLN is the next important question for treatment planning. Because of the depth of SLNs, PAT might be the best choice, and in fact, in Table 3, all of the human studies of SLNs were performed by PAT, although in some cases, AR-PAM could potentially be used as well. In cases where melanoma is confirmed metastasized to the SLN (or beyond), detection of CTCs is very valuable for monitoring responses to cancer treatment and evaluating prognosis. With PAI being a technology based on high-energy laser, fast switching between imaging and ablation of CTCs has been investigated in small animals, it could be translated into a theranostic application, once the concept is sufficiently confirmed through clinical studies. Although melanin is an adequate optical contrast for early-stage melanomas, it is not sufficient for later stage melanomas due to the limitation of light penetration in deep structures. Exogenous contrast agents have been shown to increase PA signals beyond the signal level obtained using the label-free PAI (endogenous contrast agents). As discussed in Sec. 3.5, different tumor cell targets (antigens) of the antibody-coupled exogenous contrast agents have been tested on animal models. While the results seemed promising, exogenous contrast agents need to be proven safe to have clinical utility. In addition, before exogenous contrast agents are studied in humans, a unique target protein present on melanoma cells and absent on healthy cells will need to be identified, such as galectin-3 or collagen XVII, which have recently been shown to be overexpressed in melanoma cells.281 Furthermore, few if any studies have investigated whether a contrast agent could be applied topically on the melanoma lesion as opposed to intravenously, which could mitigate potential toxicity. However, PAI will likely need to gain clinical utility before exogenous contrast agents are rigorously investigated in humans. While PAI holds great clinical potential, safety and cost are factors that may limit the ease of clinical translatability. There is a safety concern about tissue damage from the light excitation. The American National Standards Institute has already defined the maximum permissible exposure, which is the level of electromagnetic radiation that a person can be exposed to without harmful effects, for skin imaging;91 another is potential damage to the eyes of the patient or the physician from stray laser light, which can be mitigated by using appropriate protective eyewear. Cost is a further potential limitation that can be mitigated by mass production of PAI systems. A final hurdle is the need for pulsed nanosecond lasers, which can be costly. Low-cost laser sources such as laser diodes and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been shown to be effective in some PAI applications.282–284 In recent years, there has been a growing interest among various companies in the development and commercialization of PAI systems for medical applications.145,285 Among them are iThera Medical GmbH,105,130,180,286–297 FUJIFILM VisualSonics,135,171,187,298 ENDRA Life Sciences Inc.,299–303 TomoWave Laboratories,304–307 and Seno Medical Instruments.308,309 Although there exist commercial systems for skin imaging, there has not been any customized clinical system for melanoma imaging applications. 5.ConclusionsPrior CM studies in animals and humans have illustrated PAI’s potential use in identifying tumor depth, analysis of angiogenesis, detection of lymph node metastasis, detection and ablation of CTCs, and ability to generate histology-like images of various cancers on unstained slides. These applications stem from the high spatial and temporal resolution, adequate penetration depth, and label-free nature of this imaging modality. Many of these opportunities are based on the use of melanin as a high-absorbing chromophore. However, reliance on melanin has a few limitations. First, as noted above,251 for tumors with very high density of melanoma, it can be difficult for PAI to penetrate through the tumor to detect lower boundaries without assistance from, for example, US structural information. Second, amelanotic melanoma, which accounts for 1% to 8% of all melanomas, is a form of melanoma with little to no pigment (lesion pigment not differentiated from skin).310 Methods focused on melanin detection could miss these lesions, and PAFC likely will miss amelanotic CTCs. Despite the advantages of PAI described in this review, this technique has not yet been used as a diagnostic-assistant tool in large-scale clinical studies. One possible way to enroll large groups of patients in future studies would be to incorporate PAI before performing procedures to remove lesions suspicious for melanoma or before lymph node excisions. This would allow for characterization of PAI images from various pigmented lesions that may clinically resemble melanoma, such as benign nevi, dysplastic nevi, lentigo, etc., as well potential malignant lymph nodes. As more images are collected and analyzed, algorithms on the recognition of melanoma in PA images will mature. Safety and cost are two key parameters in clinical translatability of PAI. The use of laser light must be limited to the maximum permissible levels for skin imaging, and protective eyewear or confining apparatus can mitigate potential damage to eyes. PAI system costs can be reduced by using a combination of LEDs and development of low-cost US transducers designed specifically for PA applications. Code and Data AvailabilityThe data presented in this review article has been collected from different sources and each source has been cited in the article for further details. Author ContributionsJoseph Fakhoury contributed to investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. Juliana Benavides contributed to investigation and writing—review and editing. Rayyan Manwar contributed to visualization, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. Mohsin Zafar contributed to formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing. Qiuyun Xu, Ricardo Engel, Maria M. Tsoukas, and Steven Daveluy contributed to investigation, methodology, validation, and writing—review and editing. Darius Mehregan contributed to writing—review and editing. Kamran Avanaki contributed to formal analysis, methodology, resources, supervision, validation, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Department of Dermatology at Wayne State University and the Dermatology Department at the University of Illinois at Chicago for their support. The authors also would like to thank the Melanoma Research Alliance (Grant No. 624320) for their support. ReferencesE. Linos et al.,
“Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 129
(7), 1666
–1674 https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.423 JIDEAE 0022-202X
(2009).
Google Scholar
C. L. Kosary et al.,
“Clinical and prognostic factors for melanoma of the skin using SEER registries: collaborative stage data collection system, version 1 and version 2,”
Cancer, 120 3807
–3814 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29050 CANCAR 0008-543X
(2014).
Google Scholar
Jr. G. P. Guy,
“Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982–2030,”
MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep, 64
(21), 591
–596
(2015).
Google Scholar
D. C. Whiteman, A. C. Green and C. M. Olsen,
“The growing burden of invasive melanoma: projections of incidence rates and numbers of new cases in six susceptible populations through 2031,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 136
(6), 1161
–1171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.035 JIDEAE 0022-202X
(2016).
Google Scholar
F. Erdmann et al.,
“International trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma 1953–2008—are recent generations at higher or lower risk?,”
Int. J. Cancer, 132
(2), 385
–400 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27616 IJCNAW 1097-0215
(2013).
Google Scholar
A. Noone et al.,
“SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2015,”
(2018). Google Scholar
R. Shellenberger, M. Nabhan and S. Kakaraparthi,
“Melanoma screening: a plan for improving early detection,”
Ann. Med., 48
(3), 142
–148 https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2016.1145795
(2016).
Google Scholar
American Cancer Society,
“Cancer facts and figures 2018,”
(2018). https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2018.html Google Scholar
L. Garibyan and D. E. Fisher,
“How sunlight causes melanoma,”
Curr. Oncol. Rep., 12
(5), 319
–326 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-010-0119-y
(2010).
Google Scholar
R. S. Stern,
“Prevalence of a history of skin cancer in 2007: results of an incidence-based model,”
Arch. Dermatol., 146
(3), 279
–282 https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2010.4
(2010).
Google Scholar
S. M. Swetter et al.,
“Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 80
(1), 208
–250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2019).
Google Scholar
E. K. Bartlett and G. C. Karakousis,
“Current staging and prognostic factors in melanoma,”
Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am., 24
(2), 215
–227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2014.12.001
(2015).
Google Scholar
M. Lechner, C. Boshoff, S. Beck,
“Cancer epigenome,”
Advances in Genetics, 247
–276 Elsevier(
(2010). Google Scholar
W. Weyers,
“Screening for malignant melanoma-a critical assessment in historical perspective,”
Dermatol. Pract. Conceptual, 8
(2), 89
–103 https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0802a06
(2018).
Google Scholar
Y. Cheng et al.,
“Stage-specific prognostic biomarkers in melanoma,”
Oncotarget, 6
(6), 4180
–4189 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2907
(2015).
Google Scholar
C. Fink and H. A. Haenssle,
“Non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma,”
Skin Res. Technol., 23
(3), 261
–271 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12350
(2017).
Google Scholar
M. A. Boone et al.,
“In vivo assessment of optical properties of melanocytic skin lesions and differentiation of melanoma from non-malignant lesions by high-definition optical coherence tomography,”
Arch. Dermatol. Res., 308
(1), 7
–20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1608-5
(2016).
Google Scholar
Q. Xu, The Advanced Applications for Optical Coherence Tomography in Skin Imaging, Wayne State University(
(2021). Google Scholar
Z. Fayyaz et al.,
“A comparative study of optimization algorithms for wavefront shaping,”
J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci., 12
(04), 1942002 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545819420021
(2019).
Google Scholar
M. Forouzandeh et al.,
“The efficacy and morphological effects of hydrogen peroxide 40% topical solution for the treatment of seborrheic keratoses, evaluated by dynamic optical coherence tomography,”
Skin Res. Technol., 26
(1), 142
–145 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12752
(2020).
Google Scholar
E. Jalilian et al.,
“Contrast‐enhanced optical coherence tomography for melanoma detection: an in vitro study,”
J. Biophotonics, 13
(5), e201960097 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201960097
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki and A. Podoleanu,
“En-face time-domain optical coherence tomography with dynamic focus for high-resolution imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(5), 056009 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.056009 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2017).
Google Scholar
D. Tes et al.,
“Granular cell tumor imaging using optical coherence tomography,”
Biomed. Eng. Comput. Biol., 9 1179597218790250 https://doi.org/10.1177/1179597218790250
(2018).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki et al.,
“Investigation of basal cell carcinoma using dynamic focus optical coherence tomography,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(10), 2116
–2124 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.002116 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki, A. Hojjat and A. G. Podoleanu,
“Investigation of computer-based skin cancer detection using optical coherence tomography,”
J. Mod. Opt., 56
(13), 1536
–1544 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340902990007 JMOPEW 0950-0340
(2009).
Google Scholar
Q. Xu et al.,
“Monitoring the topical delivery of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles using optical coherence tomography,”
Skin Res. Technol., 26
(2), 263
–268 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12789
(2020).
Google Scholar
J. Lee et al.,
“Noninvasive imaging exploration of phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica using high-frequency ultrasound and optical coherence tomography: can biopsy of PPK patients be avoided?,”
Skin Res. Technol., 29
(4), e13279 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13279
(2023).
Google Scholar
K. Avanaki and P. Andersen,
“Oct radiomic features for differentiation of early malignant melanoma from benign nevus,”
(2020). Google Scholar
J. Lee et al.,
“Optical coherence tomography confirms non‐malignant pigmented lesions in phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica using a support vector machine learning algorithm,”
Skin Res. Technol., 29
(6), e13377 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13377
(2023).
Google Scholar
K. Avanaki, P. E. Andersen,
“Optical coherence tomography for melanoma detection,”
New Technologies in Dermatological Science and Practice, 47
–58 CRC Press(
(2021). Google Scholar
A. Rajabi-Estarabadi et al.,
“Optical coherence tomography imaging of melanoma skin cancer,”
Lasers Med. Sci., 34 411
–420 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2696-1 LMSCEZ 1435-604X
(2019).
Google Scholar
Z. Turani et al.,
“Optical radiomic signatures derived from OCT images to improve identification of melanoma,”
in Eur. Conf. Biomed. Opt.,
(2019). Google Scholar
B. Lukas et al.,
“Skin cancer detection using optical coherence tomography,”
Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging for Cancer Diagnostics: Fundamentals, Progress, and Challenges, 473
–495 World Scientific(
(2023). Google Scholar
Q. Xu et al.,
“Swept-source optical coherence tomography–supervised biopsy,”
Dermatol. Surg., 44
(6), 768
–775 https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001475
(2018).
Google Scholar
S. Adabi et al.,
“Universal in vivo textural model for human skin based on optical coherence tomograms,”
Sci. Rep., 7
(1), 17912 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17398-8
(2017).
Google Scholar
C. Herman,
“Emerging technologies for the detection of melanoma: achieving better outcomes,”
Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol., 5 195 https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S27902
(2012).
Google Scholar
R. Manwar et al.,
“Deep learning protocol for improved photoacoustic brain imaging,”
J. Biophotonics, 13
(10), e202000212 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202000212
(2020).
Google Scholar
K. Kratkiewicz et al.,
“Technical considerations in the Verasonics research ultrasound platform for developing a photoacoustic imaging system,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 12
(2), 1050
–1084 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.415481 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2021).
Google Scholar
K. Kratkiewicz et al.,
“Photoacoustic/ultrasound/optical coherence tomography evaluation of melanoma lesion and healthy skin in a swine model,”
Sensors, 19
(12), 2815 https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122815 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Hariri et al.,
“Towards low cost photoacoustic microscopy system for evaluation of skin health,”
Proc. SPIE, 9976 99760X https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2238423 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. Blundo et al.,
“Comparative analysis of diagnostic techniques for melanoma detection: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies and meta-analysis,”
Front. Med., 8 637069 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.637069
(2021).
Google Scholar
Y. Xing et al.,
“Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis,”
J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 103
(2), 129
–142 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq455 JNCIEQ
(2011).
Google Scholar
Y. Xing, K. D. Cromwell and J. N. Cormier,
“Review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients,”
Dermatol. Res. Pract., 2012 941921 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/941921
(2012).
Google Scholar
I. Steinberg et al.,
“Photoacoustic clinical imaging,”
Photoacoustics, 14 77
–98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001
(2019).
Google Scholar
M. Liu and W. Drexler,
“Optical coherence tomography angiography and photoacoustic imaging in dermatology,”
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 18
(5), 945
–962 https://doi.org/10.1039/c8pp00471d
(2019).
Google Scholar
T. Vienneau, T. Vu, J. Yao,
“Photoacoustic imaging of skin,”
Imaging Technologies and Transdermal Delivery in Skin Disorders, 411
–442
(2019). Google Scholar
P. Beard,
“Biomedical photoacoustic imaging,”
Interface Focus, 1
(4), 602
–631 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028
(2011).
Google Scholar
M. W. Schellenberg and H. K. Hunt,
“Hand-held optoacoustic imaging: a review,”
Photoacoustics, 11 14
–27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.07.001
(2018).
Google Scholar
S. Liu et al.,
“Continuous wave laser excitation based portable optoacoustic imaging system for melanoma detection,”
in IEEE Biomed. Circuits and Syst. Conf. (BioCAS),
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOCAS.2019.8919157 Google Scholar
M. Nasiriavanaki et al.,
“High-resolution photoacoustic tomography of resting-state functional connectivity in the mouse brain,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111
(1), 21
–26 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311868111
(2014).
Google Scholar
N. Meimani et al.,
“A numerical analysis of a semi-dry coupling configuration in photoacoustic computed tomography for infant brain imaging,”
Photoacoustics, 7 27
–35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2017.06.001
(2017).
Google Scholar
D. Nasri et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging for investigating tumor hypoxia: a strategic assessment,”
Theranostics, 13
(10), 3346 https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.84253
(2023).
Google Scholar
A. Hariri et al.,
“Development of low-cost photoacoustic imaging systems using very low-energy pulsed laser diodes,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(7), 075001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.7.075001 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2017).
Google Scholar
S. Mahmoodkalayeh et al.,
“Low temperature-mediated enhancement of photoacoustic imaging depth,”
Sci. Rep., 8
(1), 4873 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22898-2
(2018).
Google Scholar
L. Mohammadi et al.,
“Skull’s acoustic attenuation and dispersion modeling on photoacoustic signal,”
Proc. SPIE, 10494 104946K https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2291362 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2018).
Google Scholar
L. Mohammadi et al.,
“Skull’s aberration modeling: towards photoacoustic human brain imaging,”
Proc. SPIE, 10878 108785W https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2510549 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2019).
Google Scholar
A.-R. Mohammadi-Nejad et al.,
“Neonatal brain resting-state functional connectivity imaging modalities,”
Photoacoustics, 10 1
–19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.01.003
(2018).
Google Scholar
M. Mozaffarzadeh et al.,
“Double-stage delay multiply and sum beamforming algorithm: application to linear-array photoacoustic imaging,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 65
(1), 31
–42 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2690959 IEBEAX 0018-9294
(2018).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“A phosphorus phthalocyanine formulation with intense absorbance at 1000 nm for deep optical imaging,”
Theranostics, 6
(5), 688 https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14555
(2016).
Google Scholar
C. Benvenuto-Andrade et al.,
“Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions,”
Arch. Dermatol., 143
(3), 329
–338 https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.143.3.329
(2007).
Google Scholar
S. Segura et al.,
“Development of a two-step method for the diagnosis of melanoma by reflectance confocal microscopy,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 61
(2), 216
–229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.014 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2009).
Google Scholar
T. Gambichler et al.,
“Characterization of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions using optical coherence tomography in vivo,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 57
(4), 629
–637 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.029 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2007).
Google Scholar
M. H. Eybposh et al.,
“Cluster-based filtering framework for speckle reduction in OCT images,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 9
(12), 6359
–6373 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.006359 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2018).
Google Scholar
S. Hojjatoleslami, M. Avanaki and A. G. Podoleanu,
“Image quality improvement in optical coherence tomography using Lucy–Richardson deconvolution algorithm,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(23), 5663
–5670 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.005663 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2013).
Google Scholar
S. Adabi et al.,
“Learnable despeckling framework for optical coherence tomography images,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 23
(1), 016013 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.1.016013 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2018).
Google Scholar
Z. Turani et al.,
“Noise reduction in OCT skin images,”
Proc. SPIE, 10137 1013724 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2255548 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2017).
Google Scholar
S. O’leary et al.,
“OCT image atlas of healthy skin on sun-exposed areas,”
Skin Res. Technol., 24
(4), 570
–586 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12468
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Hojjatoleslami and M. R. Avanaki,
“OCT skin image enhancement through attenuation compensation,”
Appl. Opt., 51
(21), 4927
–4935 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.004927 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2012).
Google Scholar
M.-R. Nasiri-Avanaki et al.,
“Optical coherence tomography system optimization using simulated annealing algorithm,”
in Proc. Math. Methods and Appl. Comput.,
(2009). Google Scholar
S. Adabi et al.,
“Optical coherence tomography technology and quality improvement methods for optical coherence tomography images of skin: a short review,”
Biomed. Eng. Comput. Biol., 8 117959721771347 https://doi.org/10.1177/1179597217713475
(2017).
Google Scholar
S. Adabi et al.,
“An overview of methods to mitigate artifacts in optical coherence tomography imaging of the skin,”
Skin Res. Technol., 24
(2), 265
–273 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12423
(2018).
Google Scholar
Z. Turani et al.,
“Refractive index correction in optical coherence tomography images of multilayer tissues,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 23
(7), 070501 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.7.070501 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2018).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki and A. Hojjatoleslami,
“Skin layer detection of optical coherence tomography images,”
Optik, 124
(22), 5665
–5668 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.04.033 OTIKAJ 0030-4026
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki et al.,
“Spatial compounding algorithm for speckle reduction of dynamic focus OCT images,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 25
(15), 1439
–1442 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2013.2266660 IPTLEL 1041-1135
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki et al.,
“Speckle reduction using an artificial neural network algorithm,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(21), 5050
–5057 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.005050 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2013).
Google Scholar
J. May et al.,
“40638 Comprehensive Atlas of healthy skin using optical coherence tomography,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 89
(3), AB140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2023.07.563 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2023).
Google Scholar
Q. Xu et al.,
“Study of variation of attenuation coefficient in different skin color and age groups using optical coherence tomography,”
Proc. SPIE, PC11934 PC119340P https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2613007 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. Taghavikhalilbad et al.,
“Semi-automated localization of dermal epidermal junction in optical coherence tomography images of skin,”
Appl. Opt., 56
(11), 3116
–3121 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.003116 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2017).
Google Scholar
M. R. Avanaki et al.,
“Two applications of solid phantoms in performance assessment of optical coherence tomography systems,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(29), 7054
–7061 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.007054 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. Crisan et al.,
“Ultrasonographic staging of cutaneous malignant tumors: an ultrasonographic depth index,”
Arch. Dermatol. Res., 305
(4), 305
–313 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-013-1321-1
(2013).
Google Scholar
M.-H. Schmid-Wendtner and D. Dill-Müller,
“Ultrasound technology in dermatology,”
Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg., 27
(1), 44
–51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2008.01.003
(2008).
Google Scholar
M. Omar, J. Aguirre and V. Ntziachristos,
“Optoacoustic mesoscopy for biomedicine,”
Nat. Biomed. Eng., 3
(5), 354
–370 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0377-4
(2019).
Google Scholar
L. V. Wang,
“Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography,”
Nat. Photonics, 3
(9), 503
–509 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.157 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2009).
Google Scholar
M. Schwarz et al.,
“Implications of ultrasound frequency in optoacoustic mesoscopy of the skin,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 34
(2), 672
–677 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2365239 ITMID4 0278-0062
(2014).
Google Scholar
D. Piras et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging of the breast using the twente photoacoustic mammoscope: present status and future perspectives,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 16
(4), 730
–739 https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2034870 IJSQEN 1077-260X
(2009).
Google Scholar
F. Knieling et al.,
“Multispectral optoacoustic tomography for assessment of Crohn’s disease activity,”
N. Engl. J. Med., 376
(13), 1292
–1294 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1612455 NEJMBH
(2017).
Google Scholar
J. Reber et al.,
“Non-invasive measurement of brown fat metabolism based on optoacoustic imaging of hemoglobin gradients,”
Cell Metab., 27
(3), 689
–701.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.002 1550-4131
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Dima and V. Ntziachristos,
“Non-invasive carotid imaging using optoacoustic tomography,”
Opt. Express, 20
(22), 25044
–25057 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.025044 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2012).
Google Scholar
M. P. Fronheiser et al.,
“Real-time optoacoustic monitoring and three-dimensional mapping of a human arm vasculature,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(2), 021305 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3370336 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2010).
Google Scholar
A. Buehler et al.,
“Real-time handheld multispectral optoacoustic imaging,”
Opt. Lett., 38
(9), 1404
–1406 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001404 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. Xu and L. V. Wang,
“Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77
(4), 041101 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2195024 RSINAK 0034-6748
(2006).
Google Scholar
A. Taruttis and V. Ntziachristos,
“Advances in real-time multispectral optoacoustic imaging and its applications,”
Nat. Photonics, 9
(4), 219
–227 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.29 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2015).
Google Scholar
V. Ntziachristos,
“Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology,”
Nat. Methods, 7
(8), 603
–614 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1483 1548-7091
(2010).
Google Scholar
E. M. Strohm, E. S. Berndl and M. C. Kolios,
“High frequency label-free photoacoustic microscopy of single cells,”
Photoacoustics, 1
(3–4), 49
–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2013.08.003
(2013).
Google Scholar
M.-L. Li et al.,
“Improved in vivo photoacoustic microscopy based on a virtual-detector concept,”
Opt. Lett., 31
(4), 474
–476 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.000474 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2006).
Google Scholar
A. Danielli et al.,
“Label-free photoacoustic nanoscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 19
(8), 086006 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.086006 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2014).
Google Scholar
B. Hindelang et al.,
“Non-invasive imaging in dermatology and the unique potential of raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 33
(6), 1051
–1061 https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15342 JEAVEQ 0926-9959
(2019).
Google Scholar
V. Ntziachristos et al.,
“Emerging technologies to image tissue metabolism,”
Cell Metab., 29
(3), 518
–538 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.004 1550-4131
(2019).
Google Scholar
V. Ntziachristos and D. Razansky,
“Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT),”
Chem. Rev., 110
(5), 2783
–2794 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9002566 CHREAY 0009-2665
(2010).
Google Scholar
Y. W. Yew et al.,
“Investigation of morphological, vascular and biochemical changes in the skin of an atopic dermatitis (AD) patient in response to dupilumab using raster scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM) and handheld confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS),”
J. Dermatol. Sci., 95
(3), 123
–125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.07.003 JDSCEI 0923-1811
(2019).
Google Scholar
J. Aguirre et al.,
“Assessing nailfold microvascular structure with ultra-wideband raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 10 31
–37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.02.002
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Berezhnoi et al.,
“Assessing hyperthermia-induced vasodilation in human skin in vivo using optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
J. Biophotonics, 11
(11), e201700359 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201700359
(2018).
Google Scholar
J. Hult et al.,
“Comparison of photoacoustic imaging and histopathological examination in determining the dimensions of 52 human melanomas and nevi ex vivo,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 12
(7), 4097
–4114 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.425524 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2021).
Google Scholar
C. Lee et al.,
“Three-dimensional clinical handheld photoacoustic/ultrasound scanner,”
Photoacoustics, 18 100173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100173
(2020).
Google Scholar
V. Neuschmelting et al.,
“Performance of a multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) system equipped with 2D vs. 3D handheld probes for potential clinical translation,”
Photoacoustics, 4
(1), 1
–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2015.12.001
(2016).
Google Scholar
C. Kim et al.,
“Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 1
(1), 278
–284 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.1.000278 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2010).
Google Scholar
J. Aguirre et al.,
“Broadband mesoscopic optoacoustic tomography reveals skin layers,”
Opt. Lett., 39
(21), 6297
–6300 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006297 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2014).
Google Scholar
L. V. Wang and S. Hu,
“Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs,”
Science, 335
(6075), 1458
–1462 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216210 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2012).
Google Scholar
H. He et al.,
“Fast raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy enables assessment of human melanoma microvasculature in vivo,”
Nat. Commun., 13
(1), 2803 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30471-9 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2022).
Google Scholar
J. Yao and L. Wang,
“Photoacoustic microscopy,”
Laser Photonics Rev., 7
(5), 758
–778 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201200060
(2013).
Google Scholar
J. Yao et al.,
“Label-free oxygen-metabolic photoacoustic microscopy in vivo,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 16
(7), 076003 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3594786 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2011).
Google Scholar
C. Zhang et al.,
“Multiscale high-speed photoacoustic microscopy based on free-space light transmission and a MEMS scanning mirror,”
Opt. Lett., 45
(15), 4312
–4315 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.397733 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2020).
Google Scholar
H. F. Zhang et al.,
“Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging,”
Nat. Biotechnol., 24
(7), 848
–851 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1220 NABIF9 1087-0156
(2006).
Google Scholar
J. W. Baik et al.,
“Super wide-field photoacoustic microscopy of animals and humans in vivo,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 39
(4), 975
–984 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2938518 ITMID4 0278-0062
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Breathnach et al.,
“Preoperative measurement of cutaneous melanoma and nevi thickness with photoacoustic imaging,”
J. Med. Imaging, 5
(1), 015004 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.015004 JMEIET 0920-5497
(2018).
Google Scholar
J. T. Oh et al.,
“Three-dimensional imaging of skin melanoma in vivo by dual-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 11
(3), 034032 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2210907 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2006).
Google Scholar
I. Stoffels et al.,
“Metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma determined noninvasively with multispectral optoacoustic imaging,”
Sci. Transl. Med., 7
(317), 317ra199 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad1278 STMCBQ 1946-6234
(2015).
Google Scholar
A. Dima, N. C. Burton and V. Ntziachristos,
“Multispectral optoacoustic tomography at 64, 128, and 256 channels,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 19
(3), 036021 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036021 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2014).
Google Scholar
S. Chuah et al.,
“Structural and functional 3D mapping of skin tumours with non‐invasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography,”
Skin Res. Technol., 23
(2), 221
–226 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12326
(2017).
Google Scholar
M. Mehrmohammadi et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging for cancer detection and staging,”
Curr. Mol. Imaging (Discont.), 2
(1), 89
–105 https://doi.org/10.2174/2211555211302010010
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. R. Tomaszewski et al.,
“Oxygen enhanced optoacoustic tomography (OE-OT) reveals vascular dynamics in murine models of prostate cancer,”
Theranostics, 7
(11), 2900 https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.19841
(2017).
Google Scholar
G. Balasundaram et al.,
“Noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging of orthotopic glioblastoma development and therapy using multispectral optoacoustic tomography,”
Transl. Oncol., 11
(5), 1251
–1258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.001
(2018).
Google Scholar
N. C. Burton et al.,
“Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography (MSOT) of the brain and glioblastoma characterization,”
Neuroimage, 65 522
–528 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.053 NEIMEF 1053-8119
(2013).
Google Scholar
A. Samykutty et al.,
“Optoacoustic imaging identifies ovarian cancer using a microenvironment targeted theranostic wormhole mesoporous silica nanoparticle,”
Biomaterials, 182 114
–126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.001 BIMADU 0142-9612
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Dima and V. Ntziachristos,
“In-vivo handheld optoacoustic tomography of the human thyroid,”
Photoacoustics, 4
(2), 65
–69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2016.05.003
(2016).
Google Scholar
W. Roll et al.,
“Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of benign and malignant thyroid disorders: a pilot study,”
J. Nucl. Med., 60
(10), 1461
–1466 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.222174 JNMEAQ 0161-5505
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. Wu et al.,
“Activatable probes for diagnosing and positioning liver injury and metastatic tumors by multispectral optoacoustic tomography,”
Nat. Commun., 9
(1), 3983 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06499-1 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2018).
Google Scholar
I. Ivankovic et al.,
“Volumetric optoacoustic tomography enables non-invasive in vivo characterization of impaired heart function in hypoxic conditions,”
Sci. Rep., 9
(1), 1
–8 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44818-8
(2019).
Google Scholar
M. Masthoff et al.,
“Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of systemic sclerosis,”
J. Biophotonics, 11
(11), e201800155 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800155
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. B. E. Attia et al.,
“Noninvasive real-time characterization of non-melanoma skin cancers with handheld optoacoustic probes,”
Photoacoustics, 7 20
–26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2017.05.003
(2017).
Google Scholar
S. Y. Chuah et al.,
“Volumetric multispectral optoacoustic tomography for 3-dimensional reconstruction of skin tumors: a further evaluation with histopathologic correlation,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 139
(2), 481
–485 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.014
(2019).
Google Scholar
W. Zhou et al.,
“Optical biopsy approach to basal cell carcinoma and melanoma based on all-optically integrated photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 42
(11), 2145
–2148 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.002145 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2017).
Google Scholar
B. Park et al.,
“3D wide-field multispectral photoacoustic imaging of human melanomas in vivo: a pilot study,”
J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 35
(3), 669
–676 https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16985 JEAVEQ 0926-9959
(2021).
Google Scholar
Z. Xu et al.,
“Visualizing tumor angiogenesis and boundary with polygon-scanning multiscale photoacoustic microscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 26 100342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100342
(2022).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“Noninvasive determination of melanoma depth using a handheld photoacoustic probe,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 137
(6), 1370 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.01.016
(2017).
Google Scholar
S.-W. Cho et al.,
“Efficient label-free in vivo photoacoustic imaging of melanoma cells using a condensed NIR-I spectral window,”
Photoacoustics, 29 100456 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100456
(2023).
Google Scholar
J. A. Viator et al.,
“Photoacoustic detection of circulating melanoma cells in late stage patients,”
J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci., 13
(06), 2050023 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545820500236
(2020).
Google Scholar
O. V. Grishin et al.,
“Effect of pulsed laser parameters on photoacoustic flow cytometry efficiency in vitro and in vivo,”
Cytometry Part A, 103 868
–880 https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24778 1552-4922
(2023).
Google Scholar
L. Li et al.,
“Single-impulse panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography of small-animal whole-body dynamics at high spatiotemporal resolution,”
Nat. Biomed. Eng., 1
(5), 0071 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0071
(2017).
Google Scholar
Y. Wang et al.,
“Fiber-laser-based photoacoustic microscopy and melanoma cell detection,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 16
(1), 011014 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3525643 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2011).
Google Scholar
M. Han et al.,
“In vivo dual-modal photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging of sentinel lymph nodes using a solid-state dye laser system,”
Sensors, 20
(13), 3714 https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133714 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. T. Martell et al.,
“Deep learning-enabled realistic virtual histology with ultraviolet photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy,”
Nat. Commun., 14
(1), 5967 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41574-2 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2023).
Google Scholar
L. Nie and X. Chen,
“Structural and functional photoacoustic molecular tomography aided by emerging contrast agents,”
Chem. Soc. Rev., 43
(20), 7132
–7170 https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00086B CSRVBR 0306-0012
(2014).
Google Scholar
P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik,
“Recent advances in photoacoustic contrast agents for in vivo imaging,”
WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 12
(4), e1618 https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1618
(2020).
Google Scholar
A. B. E. Attia et al.,
“A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: current and future trends,”
Photoacoustics, 16 100144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100144
(2019).
Google Scholar
B. Cox et al.,
“Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(6), 061202 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061202 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2012).
Google Scholar
M. Erfanzadeh and Q. Zhu,
“Photoacoustic imaging with low-cost sources; a review,”
Photoacoustics, 14 1
–11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.01.004
(2019).
Google Scholar
J. Gröhl et al.,
“Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: a review,”
Photoacoustics, 22 100241 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100241
(2021).
Google Scholar
S. Jeon et al.,
“Review on practical photoacoustic microscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 15 100141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100141
(2019).
Google Scholar
T. D. Le, S.-Y. Kwon and C. Lee,
“Segmentation and quantitative analysis of photoacoustic imaging: a review,”
Photonics, 9 176 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9030176
(2022).
Google Scholar
H. Lee et al.,
“Review on ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging for complementary analyses of biological systems in vivo,”
Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 248
(9), 762
–774 https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702231181341 EXBMAA 0071-3384
(2023).
Google Scholar
L. Lin and L. V. Wang,
“The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology,”
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 19
(6), 365
–384 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00615-3
(2022).
Google Scholar
S. Manohar and S. Gambhir,
“Clinical photoacoustic imaging,”
Photoacoustics, 19 100196 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100196
(2020).
Google Scholar
D. Ren et al.,
“A review of transparent sensors for photoacoustic imaging applications,”
Photonics, 8 324 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8080324
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. J. Riksen, A. V. Nikolaev and G. van Soest,
“Photoacoustic imaging on its way toward clinical utility: a tutorial review focusing on practical application in medicine,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 28
(12), 121205 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.12.121205 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2023).
Google Scholar
P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik,
“Fast photoacoustic imaging systems using pulsed laser diodes: a review,”
Biomed. Eng. Lett., 8
(2), 167
–181 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0060-9
(2018).
Google Scholar
P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik,
“Photoacoustic imaging in the second near-infrared window: a review,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 24
(4), 040901 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.4.040901 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2019).
Google Scholar
T. von Knorring and M. Mogensen,
“Photoacoustic tomography for assessment and quantification of cutaneous and metastatic malignant melanoma-A systematic review,”
Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 33 102095 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102095
(2021).
Google Scholar
X. Yang et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of stroke diseases: a review,”
Photoacoustics, 23 100287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100287
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Zhou and J. V. Jokerst,
“Photoacoustic imaging with fiber optic technology: a review,”
Photoacoustics, 20 100211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100211
(2020).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhu et al.,
“Towards clinical translation of LED-based photoacoustic imaging: a review,”
Sensors, 20
(9), 2484 https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092484 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2020).
Google Scholar
D. Li et al.,
“Seeing through the skin: photoacoustic tomography of skin vasculature and beyond,”
JID Innov., 1
(3), 100039 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100039
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Yao and L. V. Wang,
“Photoacoustic tomography: fundamentals, advances and prospects,”
Contrast Media Mol. Imaging, 6
(5), 332
–345 https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.443
(2011).
Google Scholar
M. Schwarz et al.,
“Optoacoustic imaging of skin,”
Imaging in Dermatology, 375
–385 Elsevier(
(2016). Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha et al.,
“In vivo fiber-based multicolor photoacoustic detection and photothermal purging of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes targeted by nanoparticles,”
J. Biophotonics, 2
(8–9), 528
–539 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910046
(2009).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha et al.,
“In vivo liquid biopsy using Cytophone platform for photoacoustic detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with melanoma,”
Sci. Transl. Med., 11
(496), eaat5857 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5857
(2019).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha et al.,
“In vivo, noninvasive, label-free detection and eradication of circulating metastatic melanoma cells using two-color photoacoustic flow cytometry with a diode laser,”
Cancer Res., 69
(20), 7926
–7934 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4900 CNREA8 0008-5472
(2009).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha et al.,
“In vivo multispectral, multiparameter, photoacoustic lymph flow cytometry with natural cell focusing, label-free detection and multicolor nanoparticle probes,”
Cytometry Part A: J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol., 73
(10), 884
–894 https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20587
(2008).
Google Scholar
D. J. Grootendorst et al.,
“First experiences of photoacoustic imaging for detection of melanoma metastases in resected human lymph nodes,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 44
(7), 541
–549 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22058 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2012).
Google Scholar
G. Gutierrez-Juarez et al.,
“Optical photoacoustic detection of circulating melanoma cells in vitro,”
Int. J. Thermophys., 31
(4), 784
–792 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-010-0770-4 IJTHDY 0195-928X
(2010).
Google Scholar
P. Hai et al.,
“Label-free high-throughput detection and quantification of circulating melanoma tumor cell clusters by linear-array-based photoacoustic tomography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(4), 041004 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041004 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2016).
Google Scholar
Y. He et al.,
“In vivo label-free photoacoustic flow cytography and on-the-spot laser killing of single circulating melanoma cells,”
Sci. Rep., 6
(1), 39616 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39616
(2016).
Google Scholar
C. Kim et al.,
“In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bioconjugated gold nanocages,”
ACS Nano, 4
(8), 4559
–4564 https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100736c ANCAC3 1936-0851
(2010).
Google Scholar
G. C. Langhout et al.,
“Detection of melanoma metastases in resected human lymph nodes by noninvasive multispectral photoacoustic imaging,”
Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, 2014 163652 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/163652
(2014).
Google Scholar
X. Li et al.,
“A preliminary study of photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-mode imaging in melanoma using MAGE-targeted gold nanoparticles,”
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 502
(2), 255
–261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.155
(2018).
Google Scholar
D. McCormack et al.,
“Photoacoustic detection of melanoma micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes,”
J. Biomech. Eng., 131
(7), 074519 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3169247 JBENDY 0148-0731
(2009).
Google Scholar
J. Kim et al.,
“Multispectral ex vivo photoacoustic imaging of cutaneous melanoma for better selection of the excision margin,”
Br. J. Dermatol., 179
(3), 780
–782 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16677 BJDEAZ 0007-0963
(2018).
Google Scholar
D. R. McCormack et al.,
“Enhanced photoacoustic detection of melanoma cells using gold nanoparticles,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 43
(4), 333
–338 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21060 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2011).
Google Scholar
Y. A. Menyaev et al.,
“Optical clearing in photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 4
(12), 3030
–3041 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.003030 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2013).
Google Scholar
V. Neuschmelting et al.,
“Lymph node micrometastases and in-transit metastases from melanoma: in vivo detection with multispectral optoacoustic imaging in a mouse model,”
Radiology, 280
(1), 137
–150 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160191 RADLAX 0033-8419
(2016).
Google Scholar
C. M. O’Brien et al.,
“Detection and isolation of circulating melanoma cells using photoacoustic flowmetry,”
J. Vis. Exp., 57 e3559 https://doi.org/10.3791/3559
(2011).
Google Scholar
M. Omar et al.,
“Pushing the optical imaging limits of cancer with multi-frequency-band raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM),”
Neoplasia, 17
(2), 208
–214 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2014.12.010
(2015).
Google Scholar
A. J. Sinnamon et al.,
“Multispectral photoacoustic imaging for the detection of subclinical melanoma,”
J. Surg. Oncol., 119
(8), 1070
–1076 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25447 JSONAU 0022-4790
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. Wang et al.,
“Toward in vivo biopsy of melanoma based on photoacoustic and ultrasound dual imaging with an integrated detector,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 7
(2), 279
–286 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000279 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2016).
Google Scholar
Q. Zhao et al.,
“Quantitative analysis on in vivo tumor‐microvascular images from optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy,”
J. Biophotonics, 12
(6), e201800421 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800421
(2019).
Google Scholar
W. Zhou et al.,
“All-optical photoacoustic and reflectance confocal microscopy for melanoma characterization,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 114
(16), 163704 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5087906 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“Handheld photoacoustic probe to detect both melanoma depth and volume at high speed in vivo,”
J. Biophotonics, 8
(11–12), 961
–967 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201400143
(2015).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“Handheld photoacoustic microscopy to detect melanoma depth in vivo,”
Opt. Lett., 39
(16), 4731
–4734 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.004731 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2014).
Google Scholar
G. He et al.,
“In vivo cell characteristic extraction and identification by photoacoustic flow cytography,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 6
(10), 3748
–3756 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.003748 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2015).
Google Scholar
D. A. Nedosekin et al.,
“In vivo ultra-fast photoacoustic flow cytometry of circulating human melanoma cells using near-infrared high-pulse rate lasers,”
Cytometry Part A, 79
(10), 825
–833 https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.21102 1552-4922
(2011).
Google Scholar
X. L. Deán-Ben et al.,
“Deep tissue volumetric optoacoustic tracking of individual circulating tumor cells in an intracardially perfused mouse model,”
Neoplasia, 22
(9), 441
–446 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2020.06.008
(2020).
Google Scholar
P. Hai et al.,
“Label-free high-throughput photoacoustic tomography of suspected circulating melanoma tumor cells in patients in vivo,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 25
(3), 036002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.3.036002 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. Han et al.,
“In vivo lymphatic circulating tumor cells and progression of metastatic disease,”
Cancers, 12
(10), 2866 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102866
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. Hessler et al.,
“Melanoma biomarkers and their potential application for in vivo diagnostic imaging modalities,”
Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21
(24), 9583 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249583 1422-0067
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. Wu et al.,
“Melanoma cell membrane biomimetic versatile CuS nanoprobes for homologous targeting photoacoustic imaging and photothermal chemotherapy,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12
(14), 16031
–16039 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b23177
(2020).
Google Scholar
P. Armanetti et al.,
“Enhanced antitumoral activity and photoacoustic imaging properties of AuNP-enriched endothelial colony forming cells on melanoma,”
Adv. Sci., 8
(4), 2001175 https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001175 1936-6612
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Kim et al.,
“Towards clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: probe improvement and real-time graphical user interface,”
Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 245
(4), 321
–329 https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370219889968 EXBMAA 0071-3384
(2020).
Google Scholar
R. H. Edgar et al.,
“Capture and isolation of circulating melanoma cells using photoacoustic flowmetry,”
Melanoma, 203
–212 Springer(
(2021). Google Scholar
R. H. Edgar et al.,
“Predicting metastasis in melanoma by enumerating circulating tumor cells using photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 53
(4), 578
–586 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23286 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2021).
Google Scholar
R. M. Weight et al.,
“Photoacoustic detection of metastatic melanoma cells in the human circulatory system,”
Opt. Lett., 31
(20), 2998
–3000 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002998 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2006).
Google Scholar
S. H. Holan and J. A. Viator,
“Automated wavelet denoising of photoacoustic signals for circulating melanoma cell detection and burn image reconstruction,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 53
(12), N227 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/N01 PHMBA7 0031-9155
(2008).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha et al.,
“In vivo fiber-based multicolor photoacoustic detection and photothermal purging of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes targeted by nanoparticles,”
J. Biophotonics, 2 528
–539 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910046
(2009).
Google Scholar
G. Gutierrez-Juarez et al.,
“Detection of melanoma cells in vitro using an optical detector of photoacoustic waves,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 42
(3), 274
–281 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20894 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2010).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhang et al.,
“Chronic label-free volumetric photoacoustic microscopy of melanoma cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds,”
Biomaterials, 31
(33), 8651
–8658 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.089 BIMADU 0142-9612
(2010).
Google Scholar
C. Zhang, K. Maslov and L. V. Wang,
“Subwavelength-resolution label-free photoacoustic microscopy of optical absorption in vivo,”
Opt. Lett., 35
(19), 3195
–3197 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003195 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2010).
Google Scholar
J. Jose et al.,
“Initial results of imaging melanoma metastasis in resected human lymph nodes using photoacoustic computed tomography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 16
(9), 096021 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3631705 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2011).
Google Scholar
C. M. O’Brien et al.,
“Capture of circulating tumor cells using photoacoustic flowmetry and two phase flow,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(6), 061221 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061221 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2012).
Google Scholar
S. Gupta et al.,
“Photoacoustic detection of induced melanoma in vitro using a mouse model,”
Proc. SPIE, 8214 821414 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.909352 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2012).
Google Scholar
Y. Yang et al.,
“Photoacoustic tomography of tissue subwavelength microstructure with a narrowband and low frequency system,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 101
(3), 034105 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4736994 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2012).
Google Scholar
C. Zhang et al.,
“In vivo photoacoustic microscopy with 7.6-μm axial resolution using a commercial 125-MHz ultrasonic transducer,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 17
(11), 116016 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.11.116016 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2012).
Google Scholar
D. A. Nedosekin et al.,
“Synergy of photoacoustic and fluorescence flow cytometry of circulating cells with negative and positive contrasts,”
J. Biophotonics, 6
(5), 425
–434 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200047
(2013).
Google Scholar
D. A. Nedosekin et al.,
“Photoacoustic and photothermal detection of circulating tumor cells, bacteria and nanoparticles in cerebrospinal fluid in vivo and ex vivo,”
J. Biophotonics, 6 523
–533 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200242
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. Sarimollaoglu et al.,
“Nonlinear photoacoustic signal amplification from single targets in absorption background,”
Photoacoustics, 2
(1), 1
–11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2013.11.002
(2014).
Google Scholar
L. Xiang et al.,
“Label-free photoacoustic cell-tracking in real-time,”
X Acoust. Imaging Sens., 1 18
–22 https://doi.org/10.2478/phto-2014-0002
(2014).
Google Scholar
M. A. Juratli et al.,
“Real-time monitoring of circulating tumor cell release during tumor manipulation using in vivo photoacoustic and fluorescent flow cytometry,”
Head Neck, 36
(8), 1207
–1215 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23439
(2014).
Google Scholar
J. Yao et al.,
“Photoimprint photoacoustic microscopy for three-dimensional label-free subdiffraction imaging,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 112
(1), 014302 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.014302 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2014).
Google Scholar
W. Song et al.,
“Reflection-mode in vivo photoacoustic microscopy with subwavelength lateral resolution,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 5
(12), 4235
–4241 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.004235 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2014).
Google Scholar
A. Breathnach et al.,
“Assessment of cutaneous melanoma and pigmented skin lesions with photoacoustic imaging,”
Proc. SPIE, 9303 930303 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2078309 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2015).
Google Scholar
M.-J. Sun and P.-C. Li,
“Imaging 3D cell culture systems using an optical resolution photoacoustic microscope,”
in IEEE Int. Ultrasonics Symp.,
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0312 Google Scholar
C. Lee et al.,
“Real-time near-infrared virtual intraoperative surgical photoacoustic microscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 3
(3), 100
–106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2015.08.002
(2015).
Google Scholar
T. Wang et al.,
“All-optical photoacoustic microscopy based on plasmonic detection of broadband ultrasound,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 107
(15), 153702 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933333 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2015).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“In vivo melanoma depth detection by a handheld photoacoustic microscope,”
Proc. SPIE, 9323 932304 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2076684 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2015).
Google Scholar
K. Bhattacharyya et al.,
“Quantitative photoacoustics to measure single cell melanin production and nanoparticle attachment,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 60
(8), 3081 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3081 PHMBA7 0031-9155
(2015).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“Detecting both melanoma depth and volume in vivo with a handheld photoacoustic probe,”
Proc. SPIE, 9708 970806 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2213245 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2016).
Google Scholar
M. Neuwirth et al.,
“Detection of melanoma metastases in regional lymph nodes using multispectral photoacoustic imaging,”
J. Am. Coll. Surg., 225
(4), S189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.431 JACSEX 1072-7515
(2017).
Google Scholar
K. Sivasubramanian et al.,
“Near-infrared light-responsive liposomal contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging and drug release applications,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(4), 041007 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041007 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2017).
Google Scholar
P. Hajireza et al.,
“Non-interferometric photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy,”
Light: Sci. Appl., 6
(6), e16278 https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.278
(2017).
Google Scholar
C. Liu et al.,
“Switchable photoacoustic imaging of glutathione using MnO2 nanotubes for cancer diagnosis,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10
(51), 44231
–44239 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b14944
(2018).
Google Scholar
Q. Zhou et al.,
“Label-free counting of circulating cells by in vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
Proc. SPIE, 10495 104950T https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2289216 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2018).
Google Scholar
Q. Zhou et al.,
“In vivo and label-free detection of circulating melanoma cells by photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt./Pac. Rim,
(2018). Google Scholar
H. Chen et al.,
“Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using transparent ultrasound transducer,”
Sensors, 19
(24), 5470 https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245470 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2019).
Google Scholar
W. Zhou et al.,
“Optical biopsy of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma progression by noncontact photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography: in vivo multi-parametric characterizing tumor microenvironment,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 39
(6), 1967
–1974 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2962614 ITMID4 0278-0062
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. Chang et al.,
“Co-impulse multispectral photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography system using a single supercontinuum laser,”
Opt. Lett., 44
(18), 4459
–4462 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004459 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2019).
Google Scholar
N. Liu, Z. Chen and D. Xing,
“Integrated photoacoustic and hyperspectral dual-modality microscopy for co-imaging of melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in vivo,”
J. Biophotonics, 13
(8), e202000105 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202000105
(2020).
Google Scholar
Q. Liu et al.,
“Label-free counting of circulating melanoma cells in deep vessels with photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
Proc. SPIE, 11241 112410T https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2543931 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2020).
Google Scholar
R. Shintate et al.,
“Development of optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy with sub-micron lateral resolution for visualization of cells and their structures,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 59
(SK), SKKE11 https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ab840e JJAPA5 0021-4922
(2020).
Google Scholar
L. Pires et al.,
“Dual-agent photodynamic therapy with optical clearing eradicates pigmented melanoma in preclinical tumor models,”
Cancers, 12
(7), 1956 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071956
(2020).
Google Scholar
Z. Wang et al.,
“Photoacoustic and ultrasound (PAUS) dermoscope with high sensitivity and penetration depth by using a bimorph transducer,”
J. Biophotonics, 13
(9), e202000145 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202000145
(2020).
Google Scholar
B. Park et al.,
“A photoacoustic finder fully integrated with a solid-state dye laser and transparent ultrasound transducer,”
Photoacoustics, 23 100290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100290
(2021).
Google Scholar
T. T. Mai et al.,
“In vivo quantitative vasculature segmentation and assessment for photodynamic therapy process monitoring using photoacoustic microscopy,”
Sensors, 21
(5), 1776 https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051776 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Park et al.,
“Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 118
(11), e1920879118 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920879118
(2021).
Google Scholar
M. T. Stridh et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging of periorbital skin cancer ex vivo: unique spectral signatures of malignant melanoma, basal, and squamous cell carcinoma,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 13
(1), 410
–425 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.443699 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2022).
Google Scholar
H. Ma et al.,
“Multiscale confocal photoacoustic dermoscopy to evaluate skin health,”
Quantum Imaging Med. Surg., 12
(5), 2696 https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-878
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. F. Kukk et al.,
“Multimodal imaging system with ultrasound, photoacoustics, and optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy of melanoma,”
Proc. SPIE, 12371 1237107 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2648257 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2023).
Google Scholar
P. M. Patil et al.,
“Optoresponsive pheophorbide-silver based organometallic nanomaterials for high efficacy multimodal theranostics in Melanoma,”
Chem. Eng. J., 470 144110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144110
(2023).
Google Scholar
D. J. Karimipour et al.,
“Microstaging accuracy after subtotal incisional biopsy of cutaneous melanoma,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 52
(5), 798
–802 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.09.031 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2005).
Google Scholar
J. K. Mills et al.,
“Effect of biopsy type on outcomes in the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma,”
Am. J. Surg., 205
(5), 585
–590 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.023 AJOOA7 0096-6347
(2013).
Google Scholar
T. J. Hieken et al.,
“Accuracy of diagnostic biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: implications for surgical oncologists,”
Int. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013 196493 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/196493
(2013).
Google Scholar
P. Moore et al.,
“Does shave biopsy accurately predict the final Breslow depth of primary cutaneous melanoma?,”
Am. Surg., 75
(5), 369
–373 https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480907500503
(2009).
Google Scholar
J. S. Zager et al.,
“Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma,”
J. Am. Coll. Surg., 212
(4), 454
–460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.021 JACSEX 1072-7515
(2011).
Google Scholar
C. Wang et al.,
“In-vivo imaging of melanoma with simultaneous dual-wavelength acoustic-resolution-based photoacoustic/ultrasound microscopy,”
Appl. Opt., 60
(13), 3772
–3778 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.412609 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. A. Swearingen et al.,
“Photoacoustic discrimination of vascular and pigmented lesions using classical and Bayesian methods,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(1), 016019 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3316297 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2010).
Google Scholar
N. Lassau et al.,
“Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high-frequency and colour Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas: correlation with recurrence after a 5 year follow-up period,”
Cancer Imaging, 6
(1), 24 https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0009
(2006).
Google Scholar
G. Ku et al.,
“Imaging of tumor angiogenesis in rat brains in vivo by photoacoustic tomography,”
Appl. Opt., 44
(5), 770
–775 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.000770 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2005).
Google Scholar
A. Breslow,
“Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma,”
Ann. Surg., 172
(5), 902
–908 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197011000-00017
(1970).
Google Scholar
G. Manca et al.,
“Sentinel lymph node mapping in melanoma: the issue of false-negative findings,”
Clin. Nucl. Med., 39
(7), e346
–e354 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000366 CNMEDK 0363-9762
(2014).
Google Scholar
S. P. Leong, S.-R. Kothapalli and S. S. Gambhir,
“Can multispectral optoacoustic tomography replace sentinel lymph biopsy in melanoma?,”
Ann. Transl. Med., 4
(24), 517 https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.31
(2016).
Google Scholar
I. Stoffels et al.,
“Assessment of nonradioactive multispectral optoacoustic tomographic imaging with conventional lymphoscintigraphic imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma,”
JAMA Network Open, 2
(8), e199020 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9020
(2019).
Google Scholar
L. M. De Souza, B. M. Robertson and G. P. Robertson,
“Future of circulating tumor cells in the melanoma clinical and research laboratory settings,”
Cancer Lett., 392 60
–70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.023 CALEDQ 0304-3835
(2017).
Google Scholar
M. Liu et al.,
“Circulating tumor cells: a new window for diagnosis and evaluation of cancer,”
Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. (Formerly Curr. Med. Chem.-Anti-Cancer Agents), 16
(12), 1529
–1540 https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520616666160223113743
(2016).
Google Scholar
T. Bauernhofer et al.,
“Association of disease progression and poor overall survival with detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer,”
Oncol. Rep., 13
(2), 179
–184 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.13.2.179 OCRPEW 1021-335X
(2005).
Google Scholar
M. Cristofanilli et al.,
“Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer,”
N. Engl. J. Med., 351
(8), 781
–791 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040766 NEJMBH
(2004).
Google Scholar
M. C. Miller, G. V. Doyle and L. W. Terstappen,
“Significance of circulating tumor cells detected by the CellSearch system in patients with metastatic breast colorectal and prostate cancer,”
J. Oncol., 2010 617421 https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/617421
(2010).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha and V. P. Zharov,
“Photoacoustic flow cytometry,”
Methods, 57
(3), 280
–296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.06.009 MTHDE9 1046-2023
(2012).
Google Scholar
E. I. Galanzha and V. P. Zharov,
“Circulating tumor cell detection and capture by photoacoustic flow cytometry in vivo and ex vivo,”
Cancers, 5
(4), 1691
–1738 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers5041691
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. Yu et al.,
“Circulating tumor cells: approaches to isolation and characterization,”
J. Cell Biol., 192
(3), 373
–382 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010021 JCLBA3 0021-9525
(2011).
Google Scholar
S. Abbasi et al.,
“All-optical reflection-mode microscopic histology of unstained human tissues,”
Sci. Rep., 9
(1), 13392 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49849-9
(2019).
Google Scholar
K. Bell et al.,
“Reflection-mode virtual histology using photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy,”
Sci. Rep., 10
(1), 19121 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76155-6
(2020).
Google Scholar
B. Ecclestone et al.,
“Label-free histological imaging of skin cancers with photoacoustic remote sensing virtual histology,”
Proc. SPIE, PC11934 PC119340F https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2609176 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2022).
Google Scholar
R. E. Benjamin et al.,
“Exploration of photoacoustic remote sensing virtual histology in skin malignancies,”
Proc. SPIE, PC12352 PC1235201 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2650980 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2023).
Google Scholar
J. Weber, P. C. Beard and S. E. Bohndiek,
“Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging,”
Nat. Methods, 13
(8), 639
–650 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3929 1548-7091
(2016).
Google Scholar
V. P. Zharov et al.,
“In vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry for monitoring of circulating single cancer cells and contrast agents,”
Opt. Lett., 31
(24), 3623
–3625 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.003623 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2006).
Google Scholar
W. Li et al.,
“Gold nanocages as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging,”
Contrast Media Mol. Imaging, 6
(5), 370
–377 https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.439
(2011).
Google Scholar
K. Bhattacharyya et al.,
“Gold nanoparticle–mediated detection of circulating cancer cells,”
Clin. Lab. Med., 32
(1), 89
–101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2012.01.001 CLMED6 0272-2712
(2012).
Google Scholar
D. Chenthamara et al.,
“Therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticles and routes of administration,”
Biomater. Res., 23 20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-019-0166-x
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Onaciu et al.,
“Theranostic nanoparticles and their spectrum in cancer,”
Engineered Nanomaterials-Health and Safety, IntechOpen(
(2019). Google Scholar
H. H. Gustafson et al.,
“Nanoparticle uptake: the phagocyte problem,”
Nano Today, 10
(4), 487
–510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006 NTAOCG 1748-0132
(2015).
Google Scholar
A. J. Tavares et al.,
“Effect of removing Kupffer cells on nanoparticle tumor delivery,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114
(51), E10871
–E10880 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713390114
(2017).
Google Scholar
Q. Fu et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging: contrast agents and their biomedical applications,”
Adv. Mater., 31
(6), 1805875 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805875 ADVMEW 0935-9648
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Farooq et al.,
“Exogenous contrast agents in photoacoustic imaging: an in vivo review for tumor imaging,”
Nanomaterials, 12
(3), 393 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030393
(2022).
Google Scholar
R. R. Braeuer et al.,
“Galectin-3 contributes to melanoma growth and metastasis via regulation of NFAT1 and autotaxin,”
Cancer Res., 72
(22), 5757
–5766 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2424 CNREA8 0008-5472
(2012).
Google Scholar
H. Zhong et al.,
“Review of low-cost photoacoustic sensing and imaging based on laser diode and light-emitting diode,”
Sensors, 18
(7), 2264 https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072264 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Fatima et al.,
“Review of cost reduction methods in photoacoustic computed tomography,”
Photoacoustics, 15 100137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100137
(2019).
Google Scholar
M. Zafar et al.,
“Low-cost fast photoacoustic computed tomography: phantom study,”
Proc. SPIE, 10878 108785V https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2510552 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2019).
Google Scholar
Q. Chen et al.,
“Progress of clinical translation of handheld and semi-handheld photoacoustic imaging,”
Photoacoustics, 22 100264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100264
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Lee et al.,
“Design and implementation of embedded-based vein image processing system with enhanced denoising capabilities,”
Sensors, 22
(21), 8559 https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218559 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. B. E. Attia et al.,
“Microvascular imaging and monitoring of hemodynamic changes in the skin during arterial-venous occlusion using multispectral raster-scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 22 100268 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100268
(2021).
Google Scholar
M. Moothanchery et al.,
“Monitoring skin microvascular hemodynamic changes using multispectral optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
in Bio-Opt.: Des. and Appl.,
(2021). Google Scholar
X. Li et al.,
“Multispectral raster-scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy differentiate lesional from non-lesional atopic dermatitis skin using structural and functional imaging markers,”
Photoacoustics, 28 100399 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100399
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. V. Novoselova et al.,
“Optical clearing for photoacoustic lympho-and angiography beyond conventional depth limit in vivo,”
Photoacoustics, 20 100186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100186
(2020).
Google Scholar
L. Hacker et al.,
“Performance evaluation of mesoscopic photoacoustic imaging,”
Photoacoustics, 31 100505 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100505
(2023).
Google Scholar
J. Aguirre et al.,
“Precision assessment of label-free psoriasis biomarkers with ultra-broadband optoacoustic mesoscopy,”
Nat. Biomed. Eng., 1
(5), 0068 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0068
(2017).
Google Scholar
Y. W. Yew et al.,
“Raster-scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy imaging as an objective disease severity tool in atopic dermatitis patients,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 84
(4), 1121
–1123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.045 JAADDB 0190-9622
(2021).
Google Scholar
H. Zhou et al.,
“Exploring a fluorescent blood pool agent in photoacoustic imaging,”
J. Nucl. Med., 57 1214 JNMEAQ 0161-5505
(2016).
Google Scholar
W. M. MacCuaig et al.,
“Development of multispectral optoacoustic tomography as a clinically translatable modality for cancer imaging,”
Radiol.: Imaging Cancer, 2
(6), e200066 https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.2020200066 CANCAR 0008-543X
(2020).
Google Scholar
L. Monteiro Rodrigues, T. F. Granja and S. F. de Andrade,
“Optoacoustic imaging offers new insights into in vivo human skin vascular physiology,”
Life, 12
(10), 1628 https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101628
(2022).
Google Scholar
K. S. Valluru and J. K. Willmann,
“Clinical photoacoustic imaging of cancer,”
Ultrasonography, 35
(4), 267 https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.16035
(2016).
Google Scholar
H. Zafar et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging of the human forearm using 40 MHz linear-array transducer,”
Proc. SPIE, 8942 89420M https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2040637 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2014).
Google Scholar
Z. Sun et al.,
“TiL4 -coordinated black phosphorus quantum dots as an efficient contrast agent for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of cancer,”
Small, 13 1602896 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201602896 SMALBC 1613-6810
(2017).
Google Scholar
C. Zhang et al.,
“Photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in living subjects using a probe targeting integrin αvβ6,”
Sci. Rep., 7
(1), 42442 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42442
(2017).
Google Scholar
D. Van de Sompel et al.,
“Improving image quality by accounting for changes in water temperature during a photoacoustic tomography scan,”
PLoS One, 7
(10), e45337 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045337
(2012).
Google Scholar
J. V. Jokerst et al.,
“Gold nanorods for ovarian cancer detection with photoacoustic imaging and resection guidance via Raman imaging in living mice,”
ACS Nano, 6
(11), 10366
–10377 https://doi.org/10.1021/nn304347g ANCAC3 1936-0851
(2012).
Google Scholar
Y. Liu et al.,
“Porous gold nanocluster-decorated manganese monoxide nanocomposites for microenvironment-activatable MR/photoacoustic/CT tumor imaging,”
Nanoscale, 10
(8), 3631
–3638 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR08535D NANOHL 2040-3364
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Liopo, R. Su and A. A. Oraevsky,
“Melanin nanoparticles as a novel contrast agent for optoacoustic tomography,”
Photoacoustics, 3
(1), 35
–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2015.02.001
(2015).
Google Scholar
A. Oraevsky,
“Three-dimensional quantitative optoacoustic tomography,”
in Int. Conf. Photoacoustic and Photothermal Phenomena,
(2022). Google Scholar
A. Liopo et al.,
“Optical clearing of skin enhanced with hyaluronic acid for increased contrast of optoacoustic imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 21
(8), 081208 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.8.081208 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2016).
Google Scholar
S. A. Ermilov et al.,
“3D laser optoacoustic ultrasonic imaging system for research in mice (LOUIS-3DM),”
Proc. SPIE, 8943 89430J https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2044817 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2014).
Google Scholar
J. Yao and N. Van Tu,
“High-speed photoacoustic microscopy captures processes within tissue,”
Google Scholar
M. Kuniyil Ajith Singh et al.,
“Clinical translation of photoacoustic imaging—opportunities and challenges from an industry perspective,”
LED-Based Photoacoustic Imaging: From Bench to Bedside, 379
–393 Springer(
(2020). Google Scholar
H.-Z. Gong, H.-Y. Zheng and J. Li,
“Amelanotic melanoma,”
Melanoma Res., 29
(3), 221
–230 https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000571 MREEEH 0960-8931
(2019).
Google Scholar
|
Melanoma
Cancer detection
Tumors
Lymph nodes
Photoacoustic imaging
In vivo imaging
Acquisition tracking and pointing