Paper
16 October 2017 Improving back end of line productivity through smart automation
Kristian Schulz, Kokila Egodage, Gilles Tabbone, Anthony Garetto
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Despite recently receiving a large amount of global publicity, smart automation is yet to be fully implemented in production for many areas, including mask making for semiconductors. One specific area that can significantly benefit from smart automation is the back end of line (BEOL) in mask manufacturing where the implementation of data driven decision making and predictive analytics can completely revolutionize our current way of working. Apart from any hardware aspect, software must adapt to the current needs of connectivity which demand the ability to handle large amounts of data, have sufficient computational resources and execute tool-to-tool communication. These requirements call for flexible and expandable software applications that increase the productivity and efficiency of backend processes. Additionally, by incorporating automated systems, businesses benefit from the reduction or elimination of losses due to human error. Given the number of human interactions within each step of the standard BEOL, such as inspection, cleaning, disposition/review and repair, mask shops run a high risk of a mishap occurring. Even by extensive measures such errors can only be reduced but not completely avoided as their origin lies in the way of how humans act. The consequences can range from harmless slip-ups up to severe manufacturing impacts which finally can lead to an economic loss. These risk levels become further multiplied as both product and workflow become more complex due to the possible repetitive cycles in the repair steps. These losses can be mitigated by the use of smart automated solutions that deliver a reduction in turnaround time (TAT) and overhead. More efficient use of operator expertise and cost reductions in data handling will improve mask shops’ productivity. Another issue that intelligent automation brings is efficient tool management. In a high volume manufacturing environment it can be challenging to maintain active monitoring of tools. Consequently, idle times and bottlenecks prevent mask shops from achieving their highest potential in terms of cycle time and reliability in delivering products on time. Having the possibility to monitor the tool clusters enables efficient delegation of operations and facilitates the optimization of workflows. The proposed model in this paper investigates the effects of defectivity complexity on the TAT in a mask shop. The inclusion of intelligent application solutions effectively address human error, bottlenecks and defect complexity reducing both TAT and TAT variability. Smart automation coupled with real time monitoring and decision making solutions help control the BEOL in a predictive manner. Therefore optimization of the BEOL workflow through intelligent automation leads to a mask production with higher reliability and higher market value.
© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kristian Schulz, Kokila Egodage, Gilles Tabbone, and Anthony Garetto "Improving back end of line productivity through smart automation", Proc. SPIE 10451, Photomask Technology 2017, 1045116 (16 October 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2280832
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Back end of line

Manufacturing

Reliability

Error analysis

Optimization (mathematics)

Scanning electron microscopy

RELATED CONTENT

Smart mask ship to control for enhanced on wafer CD...
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2016)
System considerations for maskless lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (May 20 2004)
Manufacturing performance of the ALTA 3000 mask laser writer
Proceedings of SPIE (December 08 1995)
Cost of mask fabrication
Proceedings of SPIE (July 07 1997)
Benchmarking the productivity of photomask manufacturers
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2006)

Back to Top