19 September 2017 Multiheterodyne spectroscopy using interband cascade lasers
Author Affiliations +
Optical Engineering, 57(1), 011014 (2017). doi:10.1117/1.OE.57.1.011014
Abstract
While midinfrared radiation can be used to identify and quantify numerous chemical species, contemporary broadband midinfrared spectroscopic systems are often hindered by large footprints, moving parts, and high power consumption. In this work, we demonstrate multiheterodyne spectroscopy (MHS) using interband cascade lasers, which combines broadband spectral coverage with high spectral resolution and energy-efficient operation. The lasers generate up to 30 mW of continuous-wave optical power while consuming <0.5  W of electrical power. A computational phase and timing correction algorithm is used to obtain kHz linewidths of the multiheterodyne beat notes and up to 30 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio. The versatility of the multiheterodyne technique is demonstrated by performing both rapidly swept absorption and dispersion spectroscopic assessments of low-pressure ethylene (C2H4) acquired by extracting a single beat note from the multiheterodyne signal, as well as broadband MHS of methane (CH4) acquired with all available beat notes with microsecond temporal resolution and an instantaneous optical bandwidth of ∼240  GHz. The technology shows excellent potential for portable and high-resolution solid-state spectroscopic chemical sensors operating in the midinfrared.
Sterczewski, Westberg, Patrick, Kim, Kim, Canedy, Bewley, Merritt, Vurgaftman, Meyer, and Wysocki: Multiheterodyne spectroscopy using interband cascade lasers

1.

Introduction

The interband cascade laser1,2 (ICL) is often referred to as a hybrid between a conventional diode laser that generates light from electron-hole recombination, and an intersubband quantum cascade laser3 (QCL) that stacks multiple stages for efficient photon generation. Its low-threshold drive power (29 mW demonstrated for cw operation at room temperature)4 and high wall-plug efficiency (18%)5 make it particularly well suited for power-constrained sensing applications; e.g., battery-operated devices. NASA’s selection of a single-mode ICL for methane sensing on its Mars Curiosity Mission6 is a recent testament to this. Historically, most attention has been devoted to the development of single-mode ICLs due to their spectral selectivity for unambiguous species identification. However, the limited tuning capability of these single-mode devices has often precluded multispecies and broadband sensing, which have become increasingly important in contemporary security, medical diagnostics, and environmental monitoring applications.

An elegant remedy to this issue is provided by the recent advances in multiheterodyne spectroscopy (MHS)7,8 and dual-comb spectroscopy (DCS),9 which provide simple and effective means for down-converting spectroscopic information at optical frequencies to the radio-frequency (RF) domain where reliable and convenient measurement instrumentation is readily available. This has long been considered a future alternative to the well-established Fourier transform spectroscopy technique,10 with the benefit of dramatic reductions in acquisition times.9 Although initially confined to the near-infrared,1112.13 MHS systems have lately been reported (or proposed) for most wavelengths from the extreme ultraviolet (XUV)14 through the midinfrared7,1516.17.18 to the terahertz (THz).8,19 For midinfrared in-field applications, semiconductor laser technologies such as QCLs are of particular interest due to their ability to integrate the dual laser devices monolithically. QCLs have been shown to exhibit frequency comb characteristics if the group velocity dispersion is adequately low,20 which can be controlled through careful dispersion engineering of the laser cavity.20,21 If sufficiently low dispersion is obtained, passive frequency comb generation arises through four-wave mixing due to nonlinearities in the laser gain medium.22 QCL-based MHS has been demonstrated for detecting various molecules. Villares et al.7 achieved a fractional absorption precision of 1%, with a spectral resolution of 80 MHz when water vapor was targeted around 1422  cm1, with more than 15  cm1 of spectral coverage over 60 optical modes. Assessments of ammonia,23,24 isobutane,24 and nitrous oxide25 have also been reported in the literature. However, with laser voltages of 10  V and biasing currents often exceeding 500 mA these spectroscopic systems consume far too much power to be considered for sustained portable use.

As an attractive alternative, this work presents the first demonstration of an electronically driven ICL-based MH spectrometer that covers 240  GHz (8  cm1) around 3.2  μm. The system is capable of rapid acquisition with response times down to tens of microseconds and ultimate spectral resolution in the MHz range defined by the laser linewidth. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate both rapidly swept single-mode absorption and dispersion spectroscopic assessments of low-pressure ethylene (C2H4), as well as μs-time-resolved broadband absorption spectroscopy of methane (CH4). In addition, the feasibility of tuning the laser, by current or temperature, to enhance the spectral resolution is explored with methane at atmospheric pressure.

2.

Experimental Procedures

2.1.

Experimental Setup

Two Fabry–Pérot ICLs with mode spacings of 0.640 and 0.643  cm1 (ΔFSR96±3  MHz) were mounted in two separate housings (LDM-487201) to prevent thermal crosstalk and enable independent frequency tuning. The light sources’ optical spectra are shown in Fig. 1(b). The maximum net spectral bandwidths of 50  cm1 are covered by more than 80 individual modes. The ICL wafer was grown by molecular beam epitaxy at NRL on an n-GaSb (100) substrate, with a seven-stage carrier-rebalanced design4 similar to that employed by Canedy et al.26 The narrow ridges were processed by photolithography and reactive-ion etching using a Cl-based inductively coupled plasma (ICP) that proceeded to a depth below the active core of the device, as shown in the end-view SEM micrograph of Fig. 1(c). A Si3N4 layer was deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, and a top contact window etched back using SF6-based ICP. The ridges were metallized and electro-plated with 5  μm of Au, and then mounted epitaxial-side up without facet coatings. Both devices had ridge widths of 8  μm and nominal cavity lengths of 2 mm. However, the two cavities were intentionally cleaved to lengths differing by 15  μm, to slightly offset the individual laser mode spacings to values of 0.640 and 0.643  cm1, respectively [corresponding to a free spectral range (FSR) difference of 96±3  MHz]. The cw threshold drive power for each FP-ICL operating at 25°C was 170  mW, which is lower than for a typical QCL but still far higher than in optimized ICL devices. Since the devices were not intentionally dispersion engineered, the multiheterodyne measurements relied on bias and temperature regimes that featured sufficiently narrow beat note linewidths.

Fig. 1

Experimental overview and laser characteristics. (a) Schematic of the multiheterodyne setup using ICLs. One laser is used as an LO, while the other probes the sample. (b) FTIR spectra of the two ICLs driven at temperatures of 17.32°C and 11.84°C, and currents of 105.3 and 127.8 mA, respectively. (c) SEM micrograph of an ICL narrow ridge output facet. (d) Optical mode spectrum of the ICLs measured by FTIR with a spectral resolution of 0.125  cm1. The intensity of the signal laser is attenuated by propagation through a methane sample. Note that the poor spectral resolution of the FTIR prevents any visual identification of the FSR difference of the lasers. The inset shows the resulting multiheterodyne beat spectrum. (e) Multiheterodyne interferogram recorded at 20 GS/s and down-sampled to 2.5 GS/s. (f) Expanded view of the data shown in (e).

OE_57_1_011014_f001.png

Multimode light produced by each ICL, spanning 15  cm1 centered at 3110  cm1, was collimated by an AR-coated f/1.6 aspheric lens (LightPath model 390037IR-3) and strongly attenuated by irises to minimize the effect of nonlinearities in the photodetectors and suppress optical feedback. The use of a custom-made motorized rotary sample cell with individual reference and sample compartments27 enabled rapid switching between the zero-gas and sample measurements. This ensured that the noise properties of the reference and sample measurements were highly correlated, which reduced the influence of their common mode noise. The sample interaction pathlengths in the absorption cell and reference cell were 2.2 cm. The beams from the two sources were guided onto two fast (3  dB cutoff-frequency of 1  GHz) TEC-cooled mercury-cadmium telluride photodetectors (Vigo PV-4TE-10.6) to provide sample and reference down-converted spectroscopic signals, which were amplified by 40 dB low-noise amplifiers, with noise figures of 1 dB, and bandwidths of 1 GHz (Pasternack PE15A1012). A 3.5 GHz, four channel, 8-bit oscilloscope with a sampling rate of 20 GS/s (LeCroy WavePro 735Zi) was used in oversampling mode to acquire synchronously triggered two-channel spectroscopic data for 500  μs with an effective sampling rate of 2.5 GS/s and a theoretical vertical resolution of 12 bits.

To minimize the RF interference and ground loops, two low-noise laser current drivers (Wavelength Electronics QCL500) were supplied by a 24 V linear power supply (BK Precision 1672) driven from a double-conversion uninterruptable power supply (APC 1000XL) connected via an AC isolating transformer. High-precision TEC temperature controllers (Arroyo Instruments 5305 TECSource) were used to minimize thermal fluctuations to below 10 mK. Figure 1(a) shows the experimental setup used for this demonstration, where only the optical path is illustrated for simplicity. The setup is built around the differential DCS configuration,28 where the two high-bandwidth photodetectors are used to suppress amplitude noise through balanced detection. As in most DCS configurations, one device operates as a signal laser that probes the sample species, whereas the other acts as a local oscillator (LO) that does not interact with the sample. Careful spatial overlap of the laser beams, together with the difference in mode spacings, produces a multiheterodyne beat signal within the photodetector electrical bandwidth. This effectively down-converts the optical spectrum information from the optical domain to the RF domain, where it can be conveniently digitized and processed. The parallel nature of this procedure, which provides access to spectroscopic information from all the optical modes simultaneously, sets it apart from most rivaling techniques that require slow single-mode frequency tuning or optical delay line movements. Figure 1(d) shows the emission spectrum of the ICLs measured by Fourier transform spectroscopy with a resolution of 0.125  cm1. The pairs of modes from both lasers creating heterodyne beat notes within the detector bandwidth are labeled with integers for identification, and the corresponding RF beat notes are shown in the inset. The pair of optical modes with the highest spectral overlap (labeled with “0”) produces the lowest frequency beat note, which is positioned explicitly at a frequency corresponding to a quarter of the FSR difference. Since this mode resides near the center of the mode structure, its precise positioning in the RF domain enables aliasing of the positive and negative frequencies in the DC-centered RF spectrum, which creates equidistant frequency spacing of the beat notes. A doubling of the number of beat notes available within the detector bandwidth is thereby achieved, which subsequently doubles the optical spectral coverage.28 For the particular laser operating conditions used, 16 beat notes could be acquired simultaneously, which provides an instantaneous spectral coverage of 300  GHz. Figure 1(e) shows a time-domain interferogram acquired during 500  μs. Just as in QCL-based dual comb spectroscopy, the beating signal amplitude is nearly constant during the acquisition,7 which is in significant contrast to MHS systems based on mode-locked dual comb lasers, where a burst is observed at zero delay time.29 Figure 1(f) shows an expanded view of the interferogram, where the repetitive character of the MH beating signal is visible.

2.2.

High-Resolution Narrowband Direct Absorption and Dispersion Spectroscopy

The high-resolution capabilities were evaluated by extracting single beat note Doppler limited direct absorption and dispersion spectra, where the two lasers were frequency tuned by collinearly ramping the injection currents at a rate of 1 kHz, which yielded a symmetrical scan of 1  GHz around the center frequency of the targeted low pressure (1.6 kPa) ethylene transition at 3112.58  cm1. It should be noted that such high-resolution spectrum can in principle be acquired simultaneously with all available beat notes, but the acquisition equipment available for this demonstration allowed only single beat note detection. The signal acquisition was performed with an 8-bit oscilloscope (LeCroy WavePro 735Zi) and the acquisition time was set to 1 ms to capture the rising and falling edges of the scan. For these measurements, a 100-mm long sample cell (PIKE Technologies) was used to allow sufficiently high absorptions at low pressures (Doppler limited regime). For both dispersion and absorption detection, the reference detector channel was used as an optical power reference. For the absorption spectra, a sample gas spectrum and a zero gas (nitrogen) were acquired consecutively to enable baseline correction. In the case of the dispersion spectra, an adjacent (unaffected) beat note was instead used as a phase reference. The phase and amplitude information were obtained by computationally IQ-demodulating the pertinent beat notes within a bandwidth of 3 MHz around the center beat note frequency.

2.3.

HITRAN Simulations

The spectra of methane and ethylene were obtained based on simulations using spectroscopically relevant parameters from the HITRAN 2012 database.30 The simulations assumed a temperature of 296 K and partial pressures of 99 and 1.6 kPa for methane and ethylene, respectively. A Voigt lineshape was assumed and no apodization function was used.

2.4.

Computational Phase and Timing Corrections

To perform reliable and sensitive multiheterodyne measurements, it is imperative to achieve sufficient phase-noise coherence between the two interacting light sources. A failure to meet this requirement significantly broadens the multiheterodyne beat notes, which may preclude sensitive spectroscopic assessments. Ideally, a stable phase references should be used to actively control the phase and timing errors of the two combs. However, such a procedure is experimentally cumbersome, and may not yield an improvement sufficient to justify its complexity. Instead, purely computational methods can be implemented to coherently correct the multiheterodyne spectrum, as recently demonstrated by Burghoff/Yang et al.31 While this approach requires no a priori information regarding the combs, its Kalman filter approach can be computationally demanding when handling a large number of beat notes. Here, we developed a phase and timing correction methodology that is less computationally intense and can be used reliably in cases where the phase and timing errors are relatively small (more details of the phase and timing correction algorithm are provided in the supplementary information). The core of this method is the assumption that the multiheterodyne spectrum exhibits frequency comb characteristics, i.e., it can be uniquely described by two frequencies: the relative offset frequency (Δfceo) and the relative repetition rate frequency (Δfrep). The phase and timing errors can then be extracted and corrected by considering the instantaneous phases of only two adjacent beat notes, whose phases and phase difference are used for the global phase correction (relative offset frequency correction), and for the timing correction (i.e., repetition rate correction, which is similar to adaptive sampling19,32), respectively. Results from each correction step are displayed in Fig. 2, where (a) shows the uncorrected multiheterodyne spectrum obtained by Fourier transforming the time-domain signal of Fig. 1(e). Although a large portion of the phase noise can be suppressed solely by correcting the RF offset frequency, some remnants due to the repetition rate fluctuations can clearly be observed for beat notes at higher RF frequencies. This effect is clearly apparent in Fig. 2(b), for which only the relative offset frequency correction is applied. Further improvement is possible by correcting the repetition rate fluctuations. The RF spectrum obtained after this operation is shown in Fig. 2(c). Naturally, the largest linewidth reductions are obtained in proximity to the two beat notes used for the correction, as shown in Fig. 2(d) where the initial linewidth of 2 MHz is reduced to 2 kHz (limited by the resolution bandwidth of the acquisition). For beat notes at higher frequencies the 3  dB linewidth reduction is similar, but a phase noise pedestal 10  dB above the noise floor remains after the correction [see Fig. 2(e)]. The less efficient phase noise cancellation far from the correction pair can be attributed to nonideal retrieval of the repetition rate signal and accumulative error propagation, or lower phase-noise coherence of the beat notes, which may be addressed by optimization of the laser cavity dispersion.20,21,33 The latter phenomenon has been observed also for the more computationally intensive algorithm of Burghoff/Yang et al.31 Despite the remaining phase noise pedestal, an enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by up to 30  dB and beat note linewidths down to the kHz level are attainable using the method proposed here, which is sufficient for most spectroscopic applications. Also, the narrow beat note linewidths indicate that FP-ICLs exhibit a similar optical phase-locking mechanism as observed in QCLs.22 A detailed description of the phase and timing correction procedure can be found in the Appendix.

Fig. 2

Computational phase and timing corrections. (a) Multiheterodyne beat note spectrum without any corrections. The phase noise pedestal is clearly observable, and the beat note amplitude SNR is 20  dB. (b) Multiheterodyne beat note spectrum after frequency offset correction. Most of the phase noise is reduced by this procedure. (c) Multiheterodyne beat note spectrum after correcting both the offset and repetition rate. Most of the remaining phase noise is cancelled and the SNR is visibly increased, which is especially clear for low-amplitude beat notes. (d) Expanded view of the beat note located at 120 MHz. The beat note linewidth is reduced by three orders of magnitude, from 2 MHz to 2 kHz (lower-bound by the Fourier limit). The beat note SNR ratio exceeds 50 dB for the corrected case, compared to 20  dB for the uncorrected case. (e) Expanded view of the beat note at 726 MHz. Due to the greater frequency spacing from the beat notes used for correction, the phase noise cancellation is less effective. However, the beat note SNR still exceeds 30 dB.

OE_57_1_011014_f002.png

2.5.

Radio-Frequency Beat Note Lock

Owing to a large drift of the relative offset frequency throughout the measurement, an active beat note locking circuitry was implemented to keep the RF spectrum at a constant frequency position.34 A bandpass-filtered beat note located at a quarter of the FSR difference was fed to a custom-made broadband frequency discriminator utilizing a first-order LC filter, followed by a logarithmic gain detector (Analog Devices, AD8302) outputting a frequency-dependent voltage suitable for an analog high-bandwidth (100 kHz) PID controller (SRS SIM960). The output from the controller, after 20 dB attenuation, was used as an injection current modulation signal to the LO laser driver to compensate for the frequency drifts. This locking procedure was implemented for all spectroscopic measurements. Note that this only stabilizes the beat notes to fixed frequencies, but does not alter their linewidths, in contrast to high-bandwidth phase-locking,24 where narrowing of the linewidths also occurs.

3.

Results

3.1.

Beat Note Frequency and Amplitude Stability

Long-term frequency drifts of the beat notes’ center frequencies may significantly deteriorate the reliability of the optical mode assignment, due to the beat note aliasing commonly used in DCS.28 Drifts of a quarter of the FSR difference between the two lasers will effectively cause an overlap of the multiheterodyne beat notes, which hinders individual amplitude and phase extraction. Due to the finite linewidth of individual beat notes, a conservative maximum frequency drift of 20 MHz is desirable in this case. The beat note frequency stabilization was accomplished through frequency stabilization of the LO laser with respect to the signal laser. While operating the lasers in relative frequency locked-mode, the beat note center frequency stability was evaluated using Allan deviation measurements,35 which are shown in Fig. 3(a). The system exhibits a beat note center frequency drift below 300  kHz in locked-mode, and the long-term drifts are far below the aforementioned 20 MHz.

Fig. 3

Beat note frequency and amplitude stability. (a) Allan deviation of the beat note center frequency. A noticeable improvement is observed by enabling the frequency discriminator locking procedure. (b) Amplitude measurements obtained through computational IQ-demodulation of a comparatively strong beat note (at 120 MHz in Fig. 2). (c) The distribution of the beat note amplitudes displayed in (b). The distribution is of normal type, which is typically encountered for high-SNR beat notes. (d) Amplitude measurements of a comparatively weak beat note (at 257 MHz in Fig. 2). (e) The distribution of the beat note amplitudes displayed in (d). Due to rectification the distribution is skewed, which is common for weaker beat notes. (f) The solid lines represent typical relative beat note amplitude stabilities for weak and strong beat notes, whereas the dashed lines represent the relative amplitude stability of the adjacent noise floor (obtained through IQ-demodulation detuned from the beat note).

OE_57_1_011014_f003.png

An important evaluation metric for any multiheterodyne spectrometer is the beat note amplitude stability,36 which limits the sensitivity under normal operation. In order to assess this, Allan deviation analysis was performed for all the multiheterodyne beat notes of Fig. 2 by IQ-demodulating the instantaneous amplitude of the phase-corrected signal within a 3-MHz bandwidth. The Allan deviation of the strongest and weakest beat notes is shown in Fig. 3(f), and the corresponding amplitude data as a function of acquisition time are shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d), respectively. Figures 3(c) and 3(e) display the histograms of the beat note amplitudes, where the low-SNR beat note clearly displays nonconformity to the normal distribution. This implies that in general a simple mean evaluation of the beat notes should be avoided. The Allan deviations indicate white-noise limited performance of acquisitions up to 100  μs, which yields percentage-level precision even for the low-SNR beat notes. The Allan analysis can also be used to estimate the system performance for a given acquisition time, which determines the ultimate time resolution of the system for a given detection limit. In this case, according to the stability analysis, the weak beat notes suffer a precision reduction from 2% at 100  μs to 5% at 20  μs (or a lower bound of a bandwidth-normalized noise-equivalent absorption NEA2×104/Hz), whereas corresponding values for the strong beat note are from 0.5% at 100  μs to 1% at 20  μs (or NEA5×105/Hz). The values are comparable to earlier reports on QCL-based MHS7,24,25,34 and midinfrared microresonator DCS.37

3.2.

Narrowband Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy

The versatility of the mid-IR FP-ICL-based MHS technique is demonstrated by performing single-mode acquisitions, analogous to the well-developed tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) techniques.38 In conventional TDLAS, the frequency of the probing laser is swept across an absorption feature, which encodes the spectroscopic information in the attenuated intensity. Similarly, in swept direct absorption MHS, both lasers are rapidly swept across a narrowband transition (<1  GHz), while the amplitude of their resulting beat note is analyzed. Since this can be accomplished without any opto-mechanical alteration to the system, the broadband and narrowband measurements can be toggled seamlessly. For demonstration, low pressure (P=1.6  kPa, T=21°C) ethylene (C2H4) was used as the pilot species and the lasers were collinearly frequency scanned in locked mode at a rate of 1 kHz. The spectroscopic information was deduced from the time-domain signal acquired by a 20  GS/s oscilloscope. Computational IQ-demodulation with a bandwidth of 3 MHz around the attenuated beat note frequency gives direct access to the amplitude and phase interactions of the light with the sample. The results of this procedure are given in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), where (a) shows the amplitude response recalculated as transmission, while (b) shows the phase change induced by the interaction with the absorber. It should be noted that the phase information was extracted using an unaffected adjacent beat note as a reference. This type of differential measurement effectively suppresses any common mode noise that appears in the phase response, thereby reducing the influence of transmission fluctuations.34 The spectrometer achieves a bandwidth-normalized noise-equivalent absorption of 3.3×104/Hz when operating in swept absorption mode, and 2.3×104/Hz in dispersion mode using scan rates of up to 1 kHz.

Fig. 4

Multiheterodyne spectroscopy. (a) Swept direct absorption multiheterodyne spectroscopy of 1.6 kPa ethylene at 3112.6  cm1. An off-resonance noise estimation yields a SNR of 18  dB. The measurement was acquired using a 1 kHz triangular ramp, which gives an acquisition time of 500  μs per spectrum. (b) Swept dispersion multiheterodyne spectroscopy using the same time-domain data as in a. An adjacent beat note unaffected by the molecule was used as a phase reference. The off-resonance noise estimation gives an SNR of 20  dB. (c) Broadband multiheterodyne spectroscopy of 99 kPa methane using an acquisition time of 20  μs shown with HITRAN model residuals. (d) Broadband spectrum of methane achieved by temperature tuning to interleave the individual measurements for finer spectral resolution. The standard deviation of the fit residuals directly reflects the SNR of the beat notes, resulting in lower standard deviations near the center of the spectrum. A detailed derivation of 1σ confidence intervals for the data points in (c) and (d) is described in Ref. 24.

OE_57_1_011014_f004.png

3.3.

Rapid Broadband Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy

The beat note stability analysis described earlier indicates that μs time-resolution is feasible with the ICL-based multiheterodyne spectrometer. To validate this, a 20-μs measurement of methane was performed under similar conditions to those described in the previous Section. The results are displayed in Fig. 4(c), where the residuals in the lower panel indicate a NEA of 2×104/Hz. Although an initial reference measurement was used for calibration, this experiment nonetheless demonstrates the feasibility of rapidly acquiring data from transient chemical reactions such as those encountered in combustion processes.

3.4.

Broadband Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy

The feasibility of high-resolution broadband gas sensing by performing interleaved spectral measurements of a methane (CH4) sample at 99 kPa (T=21°C) has been investigated. The sample was placed in a custom-made motorized rotary cell with separated reference and sample compartments.27 This allowed for rapid subsequent zero-gas reference measurements using ambient air as the reference gas (Ptot=101.3  kPa, T=21°C). In addition to normalizing the power, the reference detector signal also provided access to the beat note used to stabilize the relative frequency of the lasers.34

In contrast to single-mode swept MHS, where the spectral resolution is limited by the linewidths of the optical modes, the spectral sampling resolution of a broadband multiheterodyne spectrometer can be no finer than the laser mode spacing, in our case 0.64  cm1 (19.2 GHz). However, this can be mitigated using the ICL’s frequency tuning properties (either through current or temperature) to interleave several spectra over the entire FSR7; although, changes in the laser cavity dispersion characteristics20 due to tuning may affect the performance. As a proof-of-concept, a step-scan (one quarter of the FSR) was performed through tuning the laser temperatures, thereby achieving a higher spectral sampling resolution assessment of the methane absorption. The results shown in Fig. 4(d) indicate good agreement with the HITRAN30-simulated spectrum for the strong beat notes around the center, where remaining discrepancies are primarily due to optical fringes in the sample cell windows and low beat note SNRs for some of the temperatures.

4.

Discussion

A compact, energy-efficient, solid-state multiheterodyne spectrometer based on multimode FP-ICLs has been demonstrated. The performance of the spectrometer has been evaluated by measuring the broadband spectrum of methane at atmospheric pressure with an instantaneous optical bandwidth of 240  GHz. In addition, the fully electronically controlled system can be seamlessly altered for narrowband detection with similar performance as systems using conventional single-mode lasers. This capability is investigated by measuring the narrowband absorption and dispersion of low-pressure ethylene. In this approach, the inherent common-mode noise rejection of the differential dispersion measurement shows great potential for applications limited by transmission fluctuations. These noise sources are typically abundant in environments heavily contaminated by particulate matter. Both swept and rapid broadband modes of operation consistently exhibited NEAs of 3×104/Hz, which is close to the amplitude noise limit given by the fluctuations of the beat notes’ amplitudes (see Fig. 3).

Since the FP-ICLs exhibit similar phase locking mechanism as earlier reported QCL combs,22 it is expected that via careful dispersion engineering of the ICL gain and optimization of laser cavities, similar broadband spectral coverage and low-noise operation can be achieved, consequently improving the MHS sensitivity. This, in combination with the low-power consumption of the ICLs, will undoubtedly prove useful for applications where available power is scarce. A typical scenario would be the nodes in autonomous sensor networks, or portable sensors that require battery operation or solar power.

Appendices

Appendix:

Computational Phase and Timing Correction in Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy

Several different phase correction methods have been suggested in order to perform coherent averaging9,32,39,40 in multiheterodyne (MH) systems by suppressing the unwanted measurement instabilities of free running frequency combs. Recently, Burghoff/Yang et al.31 proposed a computational phase and timing correction methodology based on Kalman filtering, which can handle extreme multiheterodyne beat note instabilities and RF spectrum congestion due to overlapping beat notes. Despite the excellent performance of this method there are some practical limitations due to the computational complexity of the Kalman filter, as well as the requirement of a priori knowledge of the number of modes, N, contributing to the RF spectrum, which may limit its real-time phase correction performance even in systems with lower number of multiheterodyne beat notes.

Under the condition that the observed RF spectrum contains resolvable beat notes (which may be affected by a significant amount of phase noise), a simpler computational procedure can be implemented to perform the phase correction. Similarly to the methodology by Burghoff/Yang et al., this technique also leads to an improvement in the beat note SNR and provides compensation for multi-peak multiheterodyne beat notes produced by sudden changes in the repetition frequency.41 The major advantages of the proposed method are low computational complexity, feasibility of a pure hardware online implementation, and no need for a priori knowledge about the instability characteristics.

Since the multiheterodyne beat notes may suffer from large frequency offset fluctuations, which broaden the beat notes significantly up to MHz linewidths (tens of MHz for the phase noise pedestal), the spacing between the beat notes in the RF domain needs to be sufficient to resolve adjacent frequency components. In order to fully utilize the bandwidth of the photodetectors, the spectral folding scheme proposed by Schiller28 can still be employed. This aliases the beat notes such that they remain uniformly spaced, which is commonly accomplished by DC-centering the RF beat notes and tuning the lowest frequency beat note to a frequency corresponding to a quarter of the FSR difference (ΔFSR or repetition rate Δfrep). Preferably, the RF beat notes should be loosely frequency-locked to this position, which greatly enhances the long-term stability of the digital correction algorithm. The spectral folding procedure allows for a doubling of the number of usable beat notes within the detection bandwidth, at the expense of slightly complicating the signal processing.

A.1.

Correction Algorithm

To correct for the relative phase fluctuations of the multimode sources, the algorithm assumes a frequency comb model. The instantaneous frequency of the n’th comb line can be expressed as

(1)

fn=f0+nf,
where n is a large integer, f is the mode spacing, and f0 is the offset frequency. As a result of the optical beating between the two sources, the optical spectrum is down-converted to the RF domain, producing a comb of frequencies spaced by Δfrep=|frep1frep2|, which is the difference in the FSRs (frep1 and frep2) of the two laser sources used in the system). Therefore, the instantaneous RF frequency of the n’th beat note can be expressed as:

(2)

fn,rf=foff+nΔfrep.

In the RF domain, all the beat notes are shifted equally in frequency by the difference in offset frequencies of the individual lasers foff=|f0,Af0,B|, whereas the fluctuations of the particular beat note frequency due to variations in Δfrep are dependent on the beat note number n. This effectively causes variations in the length of the interferogram and requires correction of the time axis to enable coherent averaging of the spectra.32,39

The bandwidth-maximizing spectral folding scheme introduces an additional complexity since any frequency fluctuations in the folded frequency components exhibit the reversed frequency dependence compared to the nonfolded ones. This originates from the nonnegative frequency representation (folding), i.e., 

(3)

fn,rf=|foff+nΔfrep|,
where n=(,2,1,0,1,2,), and the negative signs correspond to the folded frequency components. Consequently, the phase fluctuations of the folded and nonfolded beat notes have opposite phase and need to be corrected separately. The correction procedure is performed in two stages: first the repetition rate fluctuations are corrected, which removes the dependence on n, after which the relative offset frequency fluctuation correction can be performed using any beat note. In the proposed phase and timing correction scheme, instead of utilizing the time-domain signal resulting from a superposition of all modes, the correction signals are extracted by digital mixing and filtering applied to the two beat notes with the highest SNR (beat notes 1 and 2 in Fig. 5 are used in this example).

Fig. 5

Negative beat notes are folded to positive frequencies, which can easily be verified through their reversed frequency tuning.

OE_57_1_011014_f005.png

A.2.

Timing Correction

The repetition frequency correction is performed by timing correction. The general principle of this process could be compared to an analog magnetic tape, containing a recording of an amplitude-modulated single frequency carrier tone. If, due to aging, the tape material has been locally stretched or compressed, the frequency of the physically recoverable carrier tone will be affected. To correct for these fluctuations during the recovery of the original amplitude message, one needs to play the tape at a variable rate, which assures constant carrier frequency. If an average frequency is assumed or known a priori, or is assumed to be the average of that on the tape, one can play the recording at a rate r given by

(4)

r(t)=fcarrierfcarrier(t),
where fcarrier denotes the instantaneous carrier frequency, and fcarrier is its expected value. In our experiment, similar correction can be applied to correct for fluctuations in Δfrep, where the variable rate r is analogous to a nonlinear time axis t, where the time flow is perturbed according to

(5)

t(t)=0tΔfrepΔfrep(τ)dτ.

Such a formulation has a straightforward application in the discrete data case, where the signal is sampled at a constant time interval T, which requires resampling at new time points given by t,

(6)

t(nT)=T·k=1nΔfrepΔfrep(kT).

This adaptive sampling scheme can be realized online by triggering the multiheterodyne signal acquisition at Δfrep,32,42 or by linear resampling in postprocessing. The latter method has been used here to eliminate the need for any additional optical or electronic elements in the spectroscopic system.

To extract the Δfrep fluctuations in a computational manner, a peak detection procedure is implemented to determine the center frequencies of the two dominant RF beat notes (spaced by the mean value of Δfrep). This is followed by bandpass filtering at the extracted center frequencies (filter bandwidth set to 80% of Δfrep/2, here 37.6  MHz) via a digital high-order zero-phase Butterworth IIR filter that processes the signal in both the forward and reverse directions. This ensures a linear phase response of the recursive filter43 and removes unwanted time-shifts introduced by the filter. The IIR structure makes it possible to lower the filter order compared to a conventional FIR structure with the same stopband attenuation. In addition, it minimizes the computational cost of the filtering procedure, albeit at the expense of edge effects that can be suppressed by appropriate padding of the signal. The filtered beat note signals are mixed by squaring the amplitude versus time signal and passing the differential frequency component only. Finally, a Hilbert transform is applied to the mixed time-domain signal to create its complex representation for the instantaneous phase retrieval. The instantaneous repetition frequency is calculated from the instantaneous phase by a Savitzky–Golay derivative, whose filter order is adjusted so that it rejects numerical artifacts caused by differentiation without over-smoothing the estimate. Figure 6 shows the influence of the timing correction on the interferogram signal and its RF spectrum. Due to residual nonlinearities in the RF signal path, the high phase correlation of the multiheterodyne beat notes results in a detectable self-mixing signal at Δfrep. After the timing correction, the self-mixing signal is clearly amplified and narrowed down to widths ultimately limited by the acquisition time, which also results in enhancement of its higher harmonics that were barely visible before the correction [see the inset in Fig. 6(b)].

Fig. 6

Timing correction of the interferogram. (a) Zoom of the interferogram before and after the correction. The repetition rate in the presented time window is slightly greater than the mean 94.04 MHz; therefore, the resampling procedure stretches the signal in time. The difference between the original and resampled signal is shown in the residual plot, where the cumulative effect of a locally increased speed causes an increasing difference between the two channels. This gradually decreases as the repetition frequency tends toward the mean. (b) In the spectral domain, the detector signal possesses clear harmonics of the repetition frequency as a result of self-mixing of the RF beat notes. For visibility, the self-mixing beat notes are marked with white arrows together with an inset showing the narrowing of the self-mixing beat note. This is an indication that the beat notes jitter coherently and only the offset frequency fluctuations remain to be corrected.

OE_57_1_011014_f006.png

To further improve the performance of the timing correction, the dominant mode pair spacing criterion can be extended to multiples of Δfrep. This also allows for the use of non-neighboring RF beat notes, since the high SNR beat notes may lie in different parts of the spectrum. However, in most cases the neighboring RF beat notes are of comparable amplitude, making the simplified single Δfrep spacing case sufficient.

A.3.

Spectral Unfolding

If the multiheterodyne system uses the spectral folding technique, spectral unfolding is required in order to correct the phases of both folded and nonfolded beat notes in a single step. If the RF beat notes are loosely frequency stabilized, the beat note spacing and individual frequencies are well defined, which simplifies the unfolding procedure (first beat note frequency and the repetition rate define all frequencies in the spectrum). This approach was used in this work.

There are two possible configurations of the folded multiheterodyne RF spectrum, which differ in the order the beat notes map the optical domain to the RF domain. Subsequently, these configurations determine which direction the beat notes move when the offset frequency is changed, as shown in Fig. 7. The most widely used convention, proposed by Schiller,28 places the optical comb interacting with the sample (whose mode spacing is greater than that of the LO) so that the optical frequency of the mode that produces the lowest frequency beat note is located at ΔFSR/4 higher in frequency relative to the LO [see Fig. 7(a)]. Thereby the optical domain is mapped to the RF domain from low to high frequency, i.e., the optical modes are numbered from negative to positive in the order they appear in the spectrum. In this configuration, the jitter of the lowest frequency beat note becomes just the relative offset frequency fluctuation foff, and all the related RF beat notes spaced by Δfrep will map the positive-numbered optical modes in a non-mirrored fashion. However, one can easily obtain the opposite situation [Fig. 7(b)], where instead the aforementioned optical mode is lower in frequency than the corresponding LO mode. The resulting frequency of the lowest frequency RF beat note will thus be negative, but due to the spectral folding the beat note will appear at positive frequency. Consequently, the related RF beat notes spaced by Δfrep will also be folded. An alternative view is that the lowest frequency beat note undergoes a negative offset shift foff (in counterphase) or that the zero-numbered beat note appears as second in the RF spectrum, assuming that the offset frequency is defined modulo the repetition rate31 and is constrained to be positive.

Fig. 7

Ambiguity of the RF-to-optical domain mapping order in the spectral folding scheme. (a) The lowest frequency beat note is a result of placing the signal comb at a higher frequency than that of the LO. In this case, the RF-to-optical domain mapping is consistent with the well-established folding scheme. (b) The lowest frequency beat note results from placing the signal comb at a lower frequency compared to the LO. In this case, the lowest frequency beat note will map a folded mode. The two cases look identical in the RF domain, but they map the optical domain differently. This can be distinguished and controlled by a frequency discriminator locking scheme (see text).

OE_57_1_011014_f007.png

As a result, the mapping of the RF beat notes to the optical domain, which starts from the lowest frequency beat note, will cause a mirroring of the optical spectrum. This ambiguity and change of the mapping direction makes the assessment of the beat notes’ sign of great importance.

One way to distinguish the two cases of folding is to determine in which direction the lowest frequency beat note moves when the injection current of the sample-interacting laser is changed. This information can easily be obtained through a frequency discriminator feedback circuit, where the sign of the control signal will determine whether the lowest frequency beat note is a result of optical beating lower or higher in frequency compared to the LO. Figure 5 shows a situation where the lowest frequency beat note is followed by a folded beat note, which is consistent with the established convention.

Having determined the beat note signs followed by selective multi-frequency bandpass filtering, we can extract time domain signals that contain only the positive, yp(t), or only the negative beat notes, yn(t), while the complete measured signal is a superposition of both complementary signals

(7)

y(t)=yp(t)+yn(t),

In order to enable negative frequency representation, the data need to be transformed into the complex domain. For this reason, the signals yp(t) and yn(t) are Hilbert-transformed into analytical form, which preserves only the positive frequencies of their Fourier domains. Finally, to unfold the spectrum a complex conjugate of the negative beat note analytical signal, y˜n*(t), is added to the positive,

(8)

y˜(t)=y˜p(t)+y˜n*(t).

Figure 8 shows the DC-centered complex frequency spectrum of y˜n(t), where the gaps between the subsequent beat notes are created via filtering and unfolding process. Notably, if the imaginary component of the signal is ignored, the real part should be identical to the nonprocessed y(t). This conveniently allows for back-folding of the spectrum after the offset correction is performed, as described in the next section.

Fig. 8

Unfolded RF spectrum as a result of bandpass filtering and phase inversion of the negative beat notes made possible after applying the Hilbert transform and combining the two parts. Note the harmonics of the repetition frequency at 94 MHz after the timing correction and the DC component peak.

OE_57_1_011014_f008.png

A.4.

Frequency Offset Correction

The final step in the phase and timing correction for the multiheterodyne data is to correct for the offset frequency jitter that is common for all modes. After the timing correction, the beat note with the highest SNR and the narrowest line shape is used for the instantaneous phase fluctuation retrieval to suppress the noise contribution perturbing the estimate.

The instantaneous phase, φoff, is derived from the complex representation of the multiheterodyne signal after bandpass filtering with edge-effect suppression through data padding and phase linearization, as described before for the IIR filter. Most importantly, since this correction is performed directly on the instantaneous phase, the instantaneous frequency calculation that may introduce numerical artifacts caused by discrete numerical differentiation is not needed. For the data in this work (including spectrally interleaved measurements), a bandpass filter bandwidth of 0.8·Δfrep/2 and a beat note SNR of 10 to 20 dB were sufficient for the foff retrieval. Figure 9 plots the retrieved instantaneous offset frequency as well as the instantaneous repetition rate. It is clear that in absolute terms the relative offset frequency, foff, varies by approximately two orders of magnitude more than the repetition frequency difference, Δfrep, which causes significant beat note broadening.

Fig. 9

Offset frequency foff and repetition rate frequency Δfrep fluctuations with a 250  μs acquisition time. The offset frequency fluctuations greatly exceed those of the repetition rate, causing mutually coherent multiheterodyne beat note phase noise.

OE_57_1_011014_f009.png

Finally, the relative offset frequency correction is performed by multiplying complex, spectrally unfolded multiheterodyne signals by a linearly varying phase term corresponding to a constant offset frequency (φoff=foff·t when foff=const.). The constant offset frequency can be assumed based on either the mean value determined as the center position of the beat note used for the correction, the expected value of foff assumed a priori, or determined as a slope of a global linear fit to the instantaneous phase.

The former linear fit method typically outperforms the other two methods, as it does not make any assumption regarding the frequency of the beat note, which is a source of potential errors. Once the offset frequency fluctuations are extracted from one beat note, it is applied to correct the phase of all multiheterodyne beat notes within the complex multiheterodyne signal. This eliminates the fluctuations of foff and ensures constant beat note frequencies throughout the acquisition. In other words, the retrieved instantaneous phase, φoff, of the timing-corrected beat note centered at foff is inserted into the equation

(9)

y˜corr(t)=exp(i2π0tfoff(τ)foffdτ)·y˜(t)=exp(iφoff(t)+i2πfofft)·y˜(t),
where the first exponential term represents the phase-correction process. As shown in Fig. 10, this procedure leads to a significant linewidth reduction of the multiheterodyne beat notes, in this case fundamentally limited by the total acquisition time (2 kHz corresponding to 500  μs of acquisition time). This is a strong indication that the multiheterodyne beat notes are in fact coherent, albeit with considerable offset frequency jitter. If the opposite were true, a comb-based timing and phase correction procedure such as outlined here would only result in a broadening of the beat notes.

Fig. 10

RF spectrum after the computational timing and offset correction. (a) Unfolded and corrected version of the original RF spectrum. (b) The gray trace shows the uncorrected original spectrum, whereas the back-folded and corrected spectrum is shown in red. Not only are the beat notes narrower with improved SNR, but also the noise floor is slightly lowered, which reveals weak beat notes close to the upper limit of the photodetector bandwidth.

OE_57_1_011014_f010.png

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Adam Piotrowski of Vigo Systems for providing the optimized ultrafast MCT detectors used in these studies. The work at Princeton was supported by the DARPA SCOUT program (W31P4Q161001) and the work at NRL was supported by ONR.

References

1. R. Q. Yang, “Infrared laser based on intersubband transitions in quantum wells,” Superlattices Microstruct. 17(1), 77–83 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/spmi.1995.1017 Google Scholar

2. J. R. Meyer et al., “Type-II and type-I interband cascade lasers,” Electron. Lett. 32(1), 45–46 (1996).ELLEAK0013-5194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:19960064 Google Scholar

3. J. Faist et al., “Quantum cascade laser,” Science 264(5158), 553–556 (1994).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5158.553 Google Scholar

4. I. Vurgaftman et al., “Rebalancing of internally generated carriers for mid-infrared interband cascade lasers with very low power consumption,” Nat. Commun. 2, 585 (2011).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1595 Google Scholar

5. I. Vurgaftman et al., “Interband cascade lasers,” J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 48(12), 123001 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/12/123001 Google Scholar

6. C. R. Webster et al., “Low upper limit to methane abundance on mars,” Science 342(6156), 355–357 (2013).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1242902 Google Scholar

7. G. Villares et al., “Dual-comb spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency combs,” Nat. Commun. 5, 5192 (2014).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6192 Google Scholar

8. Y. Yang et al., “Terahertz multiheterodyne spectroscopy using laser frequency combs,” Optica 3(5), 499 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000499 Google Scholar

9. I. Coddington, N. Newbury and W. Swann, “Dual-comb spectroscopy,” Optica 3(4), 414 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000414 Google Scholar

10. P. R. Griffiths and J. A. D. Haseth, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2007). Google Scholar

11. I. Coddington, W. C. Swann and N. R. Newbury, “Time-domain spectroscopy of molecular free-induction decay in the infrared,” Opt. Lett. 35(9), 1395 (2010).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001395 Google Scholar

12. I. Coddington, W. C. Swann and N. R. Newbury, “Coherent multiheterodyne spectroscopy using stabilized optical frequency combs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(1), 013902 (2008).PRLTAO0031-9007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013902 Google Scholar

13. F. Zhu et al., “Real-time dual frequency comb spectroscopy in the near infrared,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(12), 121116 (2013).APPLAB0003-6951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799282 Google Scholar

14. R. J. Jones, “An XUV dual-comb source for precision spectroscopy,” in Laser Science, p. LW5I.1, OSA (2015). Google Scholar

15. E. Baumann et al., “Spectroscopy of the methane ν3 band with an accurate midinfrared coherent dual-comb spectrometer,” Phys. Rev. A 84(6), 062513 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062513 Google Scholar

16. M. Yan et al., “Mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy with electro-optic modulators,” ArXiv160808013 Phys. (2016). Google Scholar

17. Z. Zhang, T. Gardiner and D. T. Reid, “Mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy with an optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3148–3150 (2013).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.003148 Google Scholar

18. F. Zhu et al., “Mid-infrared dual frequency comb spectroscopy based on fiber lasers for the detection of methane in ambient air,” Laser Phys. Lett. 12(9), 095701 (2015).1612-2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/12/9/095701 Google Scholar

19. T. Yasui et al., “Adaptive sampling dual terahertz comb spectroscopy using dual free-running femtosecond lasers,” Sci. Rep. 5, 10786 (2015).SRCEC32045-2322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10786 Google Scholar

20. G. Villares et al., “Dispersion engineering of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” Optica 3(3), 252–258 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000252 Google Scholar

21. D. Burghoff et al., “Terahertz laser frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 8(6), 462–467 (2014).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.85 Google Scholar

22. A. Hugi et al., “Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser,” Nature 492(7428), 229–233 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11620 Google Scholar

23. Y. Wang et al., “High-resolution multi-heterodyne spectroscopy based on Fabry–Perot quantum cascade lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(3), 031114 (2014).APPLAB0003-6951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4862756 Google Scholar

24. J. Westberg, L. A. Sterczewski and G. Wysocki, “Mid-infrared multiheterodyne spectroscopy with phase-locked quantum cascade lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 110(14), 141108 (2017).APPLAB0003-6951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4979825 Google Scholar

25. A. Hangauer et al., “Wavelength modulated multiheterodyne spectroscopy using Fabry–Pérot quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 24(22), 25298 (2016).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025298 Google Scholar

26. C. L. Canedy et al., “Pulsed and CW performance of 7-stage interband cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 22(7), 7702–7710 (2014).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.007702 Google Scholar

27. C. J. Smith, W. Wang and G. Wysocki, “Real-time calibration of laser absorption spectrometer using spectral correlation performed with an in-line gas cell,” Opt. Express 21(19), 22488 (2013).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.022488 Google Scholar

28. S. Schiller, “Spectrometry with frequency combs,” Opt. Lett. 27(9), 766–768 (2002).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000766 Google Scholar

29. I. Coddington, W. C. Swann and N. R. Newbury, “Coherent dual-comb spectroscopy at high signal-to-noise ratio,” Phys. Rev. A 82(4), 043817 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.043817 Google Scholar

30. L. S. Rothman et al., “The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database,” J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 130, 4–50 (2013).JQSRAE0022-4073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.07.002 Google Scholar

31. D. Burghoff, Y. Yang and Q. Hu, “Computational multiheterodyne spectroscopy,” Sci. Adv. 2(11), e1601227 (2016).STAMCV1468-6996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601227 Google Scholar

32. T. Ideguchi et al., “Adaptive real-time dual-comb spectroscopy,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3375 (2014).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4375 Google Scholar

33. D. Burghoff et al., “Dispersion dynamics of quantum cascade lasers,” Optica 3(12), 1362–1365 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001362 Google Scholar

34. L. A. Sterczewski, J. Westberg and G. Wysocki, “Molecular dispersion spectroscopy based on Fabry-Perot quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Lett. 42(2), 243–246 (2017).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000243 Google Scholar

35. P. Werle, R. Mücke and F. Slemr, “The limits of signal averaging in atmospheric trace-gas monitoring by tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS),” Appl. Phys. B 57(2), 131–139 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00425997 Google Scholar

36. N. R. Newbury, I. Coddington and W. Swann, “Sensitivity of coherent dual-comb spectroscopy,” Opt. Express 18(8), 7929 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.007929 Google Scholar

37. M. Yu et al., “Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy,” ArXiv161001121 Phys. (2016). Google Scholar

38. A. Fried, D. Richter, “Infrared absorption spectroscopy,” in Analytical Techniques for Atmospheric Measurement, and D. E. Heard, Ed., pp. 72–146, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK (2006). Google Scholar

39. O. Rompelman and H. H. Ros, “Coherent averaging technique: a tutorial review part 2: trigger jitter, overlapping responses and non-periodic stimulation,” J. Biomed. Eng. 8(1), 30–35 (1986).JBIEDR0141-5425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(86)90027-0 Google Scholar

40. N. B. Hébert et al., “Self-corrected chip-based dual-comb spectrometer,” Opt. Express 25(7), 8168–8179 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.008168 Google Scholar

41. D. Burghoff et al., “Coherent breathing of laser modes in terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” in ITQW2015, The 13th Int. Conf. on Intersubband Transitions in Quantum Wells, Vienna, Austria (2015). Google Scholar

42. T. Ideguchi et al., “Adaptive dual-comb spectroscopy in the green region,” Opt. Lett. 37(23), 4847 (2012).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.004847 Google Scholar

43. F. Gustafsson, “Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 44(4), 988–992 (1996).ITPRED1053-587X http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/78.492552 Google Scholar

Biography

Lukasz A. Sterczewski received his MSc degree in electronics from Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland, in 2014, and since then, he has been working toward his PhD. In 2015, he joined Prof. Gerard Wysocki’s Laser Sensing Laboratory in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Princeton University, where his research focuses on dual comb spectroscopy in the midinfrared and terahertz, as well as its application in pharmaceutical industry.

Jonas Westberg is an associate research scholar at the Department of Electrical Engineering at Princeton University. He received his PhD in experimental physics in 2013 from Umea University, Sweden. His research has been primarily focused on laser-based gas sensing from the ultraviolet to terahertz.

Charles Link Patrick earned a diploma (BS degree in electrical engineering 2015) from Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, where he also worked as a research assistant in Dr. Peter Mullner’s Materials Science Laboratory. In 2017, he was awarded the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship to study spectroscopic techniques for biomedical applications. He is currently working toward a PhD in Prof. Gerard Wysocki’s Princeton University Laser Sensing (PULSe) laboratory.

Chul Soo Kim received his PhD in physics from University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, in 2000. His doctoral research focused on II–VI semiconductor low-dimensional quantum structures grown by molecular beam epitaxy. From 2000 to 2002, he was a National Research Council Postdoctoral Fellow in National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado. He is currently a research physicist in the Optical Sciences Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. His research interests include mid-infrared cascade lasers, optoelectronics, nonophotonics, and plasmonic devices.

Mijin Kim received her PhD from Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, in 2000. She has been working with Dr. Meyer’s Group at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, since she was awarded a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow in 2002 and joined as a physicist in 2006. Her current research interests include optoelectronic devices, which include semiconductor photonic crystals, plasmonics, and mid-IR cascade lasers.

Chadwick L. Canedy received his BA degree in physics and mathematics from Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut in 1992 and his PhD in physics from Brown University in 1998. He has been working in the Optical Sciences Division at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC since 2001, where he has focused on the molecular beam epitaxy of III-V materials for optoelectronics, in particular new types of emitters and detectors in the infrared.

William W. Bewley received his PhD from University of California, Santa Barbara, in 1993. Since 1997, he has been with the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, involved in the characterization of semiconductor lasers and negative-photoluminescence devices.

Charles D. Merritt received his BS degree in chemistry from University of California, Riverside and his PhD in chemistry from the Catholic University of America, Washington, DC. He has been at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, since 1987. During that time, he has worked in the areas of energetic materials reaction mechanisms, optical phenomena of aerosol droplets, matrix isolation spectroscopy of reactive intermediates, organic light emitting diode characterization, photonic crystal fiber fabrication and testing, aerosol particle capture technology, and mid-IR semiconductor lasers characterization.

Igor Vurgaftman received his PhD in electrical engineering from University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Since 1995, he has been with the Optical Sciences Division of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Washington, DC, where he is currently head of the quantum optoelectronics section. At NRL, he has investigated midinfrared lasers based on interband and intersubband transitions, type-II superlattice photodetectors, as well as the physics of various plasmonic and polaritonic devices. He is the author of more than 250 refereed articles in technical journals, cited more than 10,000 times (h-index of 43), as well as 20 patents. He is a fellow of the Optical Society of America and the American Physical Society.

Jerry R. Meyer received his PhD in physics from Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, in 1977. He has carried out basic and applied research at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, where he is currently a senior scientist for quantum electronics (ST). His investigations have focused on semiconductor optoelectronic materials and devices, such as the development of new classes of semiconductor lasers and detectors for the infrared. He has coauthored more than 370 refereed journal articles that have been cited more than 20,000 times (h-Index of 58), 13 book chapters, 33 patents awarded or pending, and more than 160 invited conference presentations. He is Fellow of the Optical Society of America, the American Physical Society, and the Institute of Physics.

Gerard Wysocki is an associate professor of electrical engineering at Princeton University and the director of the MIRTHE+ Photonics Sensing Center. He received his PhD in 2003 from Johannes Kepler University in Linz, Austria. He conducts research focused on midinfrared photonics and laser spectroscopic sensing. He is a member of OSA, APS, and SPIE. He serves as an associate editor of Optics Express and Applied Physics B.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Lukasz A. Sterczewski, Jonas Westberg, Charles L. Patrick, Chul Soo Kim, Mijin Kim, Chadwick L. Canedy, William W. Bewley, Charles D. Merritt, Igor Vurgaftman, Jerry R. Meyer, Gerard Wysocki, "Multiheterodyne spectroscopy using interband cascade lasers," Optical Engineering 57(1), 011014 (19 September 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.1.011014 Submission: Received 15 June 2017; Accepted 22 August 2017
Submission: Received 15 June 2017; Accepted 22 August 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Spectroscopy

Signal to noise ratio

Quantum cascade lasers

Absorption

Methane

Spectral resolution

Optical engineering

Back to Top