Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation

Jeong-Hun Nam; Yijie Yang; Seok Chung; Sehyun Shin

doi:10.1117/1.3365951

1 March 2010 Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation

Jeong-Hun Nam, Yijie Yang, Seok Chung, Sehyun Shin

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Biomedical Optics, Vol. 15, Issue 2, 027003 (March 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3365951

Abstract

Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.

©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Citation Download Citation

Jeong-Hun Nam, Yijie Yang, Seok Chung, and Sehyun Shin "Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation," Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(2), 027003 (1 March 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3365951

Published: 1 March 2010

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY