Improving exposure latitudes and aligning best focus through pitch by curing M3D phase effects with controlled aberrations

Joern-Holger Franke; Joost Bekaert; Victor Blanco; Lieve Van Look; Felix Wahlisch; Kateryna Lyakhova; Paul van Adrichem; Mark John Maslow; Guido Schiffelers; Eric Hendrickx

doi:10.1117/12.2537104

26 September 2019 Improving exposure latitudes and aligning best focus through pitch by curing M3D phase effects with controlled aberrations

Joern-Holger Franke, Joost Bekaert, Victor Blanco, Lieve Van Look, Felix Wahlisch, Kateryna Lyakhova, Paul van Adrichem, Mark John Maslow, Guido Schiffelers, Eric Hendrickx

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11147, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2019; 111470E (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2537104
Event: SPIE Photomask Technology + EUV Lithography, 2019, Monterey, California, United States

Abstract

We show, in simulation and by wafer exposures, how to improve an EUV Single Exposure Metal direct print at NA 0.33. Based on a fundamental understanding of Mask 3D effects, we show how to design a pupil in conjunction with induced aberrations to cure the M3D phase effects. For L/S through pitch, we increase NILS/exposure latitude by ~10%, reduce the best focus range by two thirds, and reduce Bossung tilts. Simultaneously, we reduce tip-to-tip (T2T) CD by 1-4nm at constant exposure latitude and LCDU. In EUV, M3D effects lead to phase modulation of the diffracted orders. This results in relative pattern shifts of images coming from different pixels in the pupil. We find that these pattern shifts are pole specific as M3D phase effects effectively induce phase tilts of opposite sign for opposite poles. This results in a pattern independent aerial image shifts for each pole. Here we show how these shifts can explain M3D phase effects (NILS loss by fading, best focus through pitch variation, Bossung tilts) and how they drive source optimization. Furthermore, we show how it is possible to counteract these M3D effects. Disentangling the diffraction orders, so that each point in the pupil plane is passed only by a single diffraction order, we can find a suitable aberration (Z6 for L/S) that effectively introduces a phase tilt of opposite sign per pole and cures the M3D effects. The idea is also applicable to other use cases: For dense contact holes we need to inject a phase front that shifts 0th against 1st order phase.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Joern-Holger Franke, Joost Bekaert, Victor Blanco, Lieve Van Look, Felix Wahlisch, Kateryna Lyakhova, Paul van Adrichem, Mark John Maslow, Guido Schiffelers, and Eric Hendrickx "Improving exposure latitudes and aligning best focus through pitch by curing M3D phase effects with controlled aberrations", Proc. SPIE 11147, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2019, 111470E (26 September 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2537104

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available