Dr. Jin-Woo Lee Profile

Dr. Jin-Woo Lee

at ASML Korea Co Ltd

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

Proceedings Article | 20 March 2020 Presentation + Paper

Understanding advanced DRAM edge placement error budget and opportunities for control

Jaeseung Jeong, Jinho Lee, Jinsun Kim, Sunyoung Yea, Chan Hwang, Seung Yoon Lee, Jeongjin Lee, Joonsoo Park, Peter Nikolsky, Daniel Park, Antonio Corradi, Hyun-Woo Yu, Sun-Wook Jung, Denis Ovchinnikov, Vadim Timoshkov, Isabel de la Fuente Valentin, Yuxiang Yin, Kaustubh Padhye, Wim Tel, Harm Dillen, Koen Thuijs, Daan Slotboom, Miao Wang, Rhys Su, Marc Kea, Jin-Woo Lee, Yun-A Sung, Sang-Uk Kim, Young-Hoon Song, James Lee, Oh-Sung Kwon

Proceedings Volume 11325, 1132506 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2551997

KEYWORDS: Metrology, Critical dimension metrology, Semiconducting wafers, Stochastic processes, Optical lithography, Etching, Lithography, Edge roughness

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 26 March 2019 Presentation

Massive metrology and failure identification for DRAM applications (Conference Presentation)

Harm Dillen, Dorothe Oorschot, Marleen Kooiman, Willem van Mierlo, Ziyang Wang, Kang-San Lee, Jin-Woo Lee, Ruochong Fei, Shu-Yu Lai, Marc Kea, Inhwan Lee, Hwan Kim, Junghyun Kang, Jaehee Hwang, Chang-Moon Lim

Proceedings Volume 10959, 109591K (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2515487

KEYWORDS: Failure analysis, Critical dimension metrology, Metrology, Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Printing, Semiconducting wafers

Read Abstract +

Introduction and problem statement Given that EUV lithography allows printing smaller Critical Dimension (CD) features, it can result in non-normal distributed CD populations on ADI wafers [Civay SPIE AL 2014], leading to errors in predicted failure rates [Bristol SPIE AL 2017]. As a result, there is a need to quantify the actual behavior of the CD population extremes by means of massive metrology [Dillen EUVL 2018]. Not only allows this to study the CD distribution, we can in parallel also evaluate pattern quality and the failure mechanisms leading to defects. This massive metrology method provides an accurate failure rate based on CD, and enables new possibilities to define a failure rate based on different metrics in a single measurement. Method We analyze the CD uniformity of pillars in polar coordinates using a global waveform based thresholding strategy. In conjunction with this CD information, we also evaluated the print quality of each individual measured feature. Fig 1. In line detected anomalies and failure definitions As we gather this information during the measurement of CD, we can limit the additional measurement overhead to neglectable levels. Application and outlook We will show how we can leverage this to determine a defect based process window and relations of failure mechanisms through process conditions (see figure 2). When we take failures in a CH dataset into account, we illustrate the effect on the shape of a large dataset distribution in figure 3. Fig 2. Defect identification for a through exposure dose experiment of pillars. For each condition >13k pillars where measured. The plot clearly shows an asymmetric behavior due to different failure mechanisms at low and high energy. The 2 vertical lines at relative energies 0.93 and 1.05 times nominal indicate the low defect process window. Fig 3. A distribution of measured regular grid dense CH. The red line is the unfiltered CD data, the blue line is the shape of the distribution after filtering individual CH measurements that have a much lower contrast than expected.

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years